Lekhan Valery, Rudiy Volodymyr, Richardson Erica
Dnipropetrovsk State Medical Academy.
Health Syst Transit. 2010;12(8):1-183, xiii-xiv.
The HiT profiles are country-based reports that provide a detailed description of a health system and of policy initiatives in progress or under development. HiTs examine different approaches to the organization, financing and delivery of health services and the role of the main actors in health systems; describe the institutional framework, process, content and implementation of health and health care policies; and highlight challenges and areas that require more in-depth analysis. The Ukrainian health system has preserved the fundamental features of the Soviet Semashko system against a background of other changes, which are developed on market economic principles. The transition from centralized financing to its extreme decentralization is the main difference in the health system in comparison with the classic Soviet model. Health facilities are now functionally subordinate to the Ministry of Health, but managerially and financially answerable to the regional and local self-government, which has constrained the implementation of health policy and fragmented health financing. Health care expenditure in Ukraine is low by regional standards and has not increased significantly as a proportion of gross domestic product (GDP) since the mid 1990s; expenditure cannot match the constitutional guarantees of access to unlimited care. Although prepaid schemes such as sickness funds are growing in importance, out-of-pocket payments account for 37.4% of total health expenditure. The core challenges for Ukrainian health care therefore remain the ineffective protection of the population from the risk of catastrophic health care costs and the structural inefficiency of the health system, which is caused by the inefficient system of health care financing. Health system weaknesses are highlighted by increasing rates of avoidable mortality. Recent political impasse has complicated health system reforms and policy-makers face significant challenges in overcoming popular distrust and fatigue in the face of necessary but as yet unimplemented reforms.
《卫生体系评估报告》是基于国家的报告,详细描述了卫生系统以及正在实施或正在制定的政策举措。卫生体系评估考察了卫生服务组织、筹资和提供的不同方法以及卫生系统中主要行为体的作用;描述了卫生与医疗保健政策的体制框架、过程、内容和实施情况;并突出了挑战以及需要更深入分析的领域。乌克兰卫生系统在以市场经济原则发展的其他变革背景下,保留了苏联谢马什科体系的基本特征。与经典苏联模式相比,卫生系统的主要差异在于从集中融资向极度分散融资的转变。现在,卫生设施在职能上隶属于卫生部,但在管理和财务上对地区和地方自治政府负责,这限制了卫生政策的实施并使卫生融资碎片化。按照地区标准,乌克兰的医疗保健支出较低,自20世纪90年代中期以来,其占国内生产总值(GDP)的比例并未显著增加;支出无法满足宪法所保障的获得无限制医疗服务的要求。尽管诸如疾病基金等预付计划的重要性日益增加,但自付费用仍占卫生总支出的37.4%。因此,乌克兰医疗保健面临的核心挑战仍然是无法有效保护民众免受灾难性医疗费用风险的影响,以及卫生系统存在结构性低效率,这是由低效的医疗保健融资体系造成的。可避免死亡率的上升凸显了卫生系统的弱点。近期的政治僵局使卫生系统改革复杂化,政策制定者在克服民众对必要但尚未实施的改革的不信任和疲惫方面面临重大挑战。