State Key Laboratory of Pollutant Control and Resource Reuse, School of the Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210046, People's Republic of China.
Ecotoxicology. 2011 Jul;20(5):1124-30. doi: 10.1007/s10646-011-0653-x. Epub 2011 Mar 23.
A probability risk assessment of anthracene, benzo(a)pyrene, chrysene, fluorene, phenanthrene and pyrene was carried out to examine the ecological risk of these six polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in aquatic ecosystems in China. The literature on PAH concentrations in surface water in China was collected to evaluate the environmental exposure concentrations (EEC). The 10th percentile of predicted no observed effect concentration (PNEC(10%)) of PAHs, calculated according to the data from the USEPA AQUIRE database and regulatory reviews, was applied as the toxicity assessment endpoint. The ratio of EEC and PNEC(10%), expressed as a risk quotient (RQ), was used to characterize the risk value. Bootstrapping method and Monte Carlo simulation were utilized to calculate the distribution of EEC, PNEC(10%), RQ and associated uncertainties. Risk assessment showed that reliable maximum RQs of anthracene, benzo(a)pyrene, chrysene, fluorene and phenanthrene were in the range of 0.064-0.755, lower than the acceptable value of 1. However, the reliable maximum RQ of pyrene was 1.39, indicating its potential ecological risk. Notwithstanding the uncertainty, these results suggest that the aquatic ecosystems with high PAH concentrations might pose potential ecological risks, and concerted efforts are required to ensure that surface water is protected.
采用概率风险评价法对蒽、苯并(a)芘、䓛、芴、菲和芘这 6 种多环芳烃(PAHs)在中国水生生态系统中的生态风险进行了评估。收集了中国地表水多环芳烃浓度的文献资料,以评估环境暴露浓度(EEC)。根据美国环保署 AQUIRE 数据库的数据和监管审查结果计算出的多环芳烃预测无观察效应浓度(PNEC(10%))的第 10 个百分位数被用作毒性评估终点。EEC 与 PNEC(10%)的比值,以风险商数(RQ)表示,用于表征风险值。采用Bootstrapping 方法和蒙特卡罗模拟计算了 EEC、PNEC(10%)、RQ 及其相关不确定性的分布。风险评估表明,蒽、苯并(a)芘、䓛、芴和菲的可靠最大 RQ 值在 0.064-0.755 之间,低于 1 的可接受值。然而,芘的可靠最大 RQ 值为 1.39,表明其存在潜在的生态风险。尽管存在不确定性,但这些结果表明,高多环芳烃浓度的水生生态系统可能存在潜在的生态风险,需要共同努力确保地表水得到保护。