• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种综合生活质量测量工具的开发:CARES。

Development of a comprehensive quality of life measurement tool: CARES.

作者信息

Schag C A, Heinrich R L

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences U of California, Los Angeles.

出版信息

Oncology (Williston Park). 1990 May;4(5):135-8;discussion 147.

PMID:2143399
Abstract

The authors present a cancer specific rehabilitation and treatment planning questionnaire and a computer scoring and reporting evaluation system, the CARES. CARES stands for CAncer Rehabilitation Evaluation System. It is a unique instrument and research to date suggests that it is comprehensive, reliable, valid, and pertinent to patients' quality of life, as they live with cancer. The CARES provides a cost-efficient method of evaluating patients' needs and can serve as a valuable adjunct to medical care. The CARES has been adapted for research settings as well, and has a short form for multiple administrations. Finally, a computer scoring and professional reporting system is available to clinicians with access to IBM compatible personal computers.

摘要

作者介绍了一种癌症特异性康复与治疗计划问卷以及一个计算机评分与报告评估系统——CARES。CARES代表癌症康复评估系统。它是一种独特的工具,迄今为止的研究表明,它全面、可靠、有效,并且与癌症患者的生活质量相关。CARES提供了一种经济高效的评估患者需求的方法,可作为医疗护理的宝贵辅助手段。CARES也已适用于研究环境,并且有一个简短版本可供多次使用。最后,有一个计算机评分和专业报告系统可供能够使用IBM兼容个人计算机的临床医生使用。

相似文献

1
Development of a comprehensive quality of life measurement tool: CARES.一种综合生活质量测量工具的开发:CARES。
Oncology (Williston Park). 1990 May;4(5):135-8;discussion 147.
2
The CARES-SF used for prospective assessment of health-related quality of life after stem cell transplantation.CARES-SF用于干细胞移植后健康相关生活质量的前瞻性评估。
Psychooncology. 2003 Dec;12(8):803-13. doi: 10.1002/pon.708.
3
[Conceptualization and measurement of the quality of life of cancer patients].[癌症患者生活质量的概念化与测量]
Rev Invest Clin. 1995 Jul-Aug;47(4):315-27.
4
Quality of life of cancer patients receiving inpatient and home-based palliative care.接受住院及居家姑息治疗的癌症患者的生活质量。
J Adv Nurs. 2006 Mar;53(5):524-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03754.x.
5
A practical instrument to explore patients' needs in palliative care: the Problems and Needs in Palliative Care questionnaire short version.一种用于探索姑息治疗中患者需求的实用工具:姑息治疗问题与需求问卷简版。
Palliat Med. 2007 Jul;21(5):391-9. doi: 10.1177/0269216307078300.
6
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Short-form Supportive Care Needs Survey questionnaire (SCNS-SF34-J).日本版简明支持性护理需求调查问卷(SCNS-SF34-J)的信效度
Psychooncology. 2009 Sep;18(9):1003-10. doi: 10.1002/pon.1482.
7
The relationship between observer-based toxicity scoring and patient assessed symptom severity after treatment for head and neck cancer. A correlative cross sectional study of the DAHANCA toxicity scoring system and the EORTC quality of life questionnaires.头颈部癌治疗后基于观察者的毒性评分与患者自我评估的症状严重程度之间的关系。一项关于丹麦头颈癌组(DAHANCA)毒性评分系统与欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)生活质量问卷的相关性横断面研究。
Radiother Oncol. 2006 Mar;78(3):298-305. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.02.005. Epub 2006 Mar 9.
8
The evolution of quality of life evaluations in cancer therapy.癌症治疗中生活质量评估的演变
Oncology (Williston Park). 1990 May;4(5):22-6; discussion 27.
9
Computerized symptom and quality-of-life assessment for patients with cancer part I: development and pilot testing.癌症患者的计算机化症状与生活质量评估 第一部分:开发与初步测试
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2004 Sep 17;31(5):E75-83. doi: 10.1188/04.ONF.E75-E83. Print 2004 Sep.
10
Standardizing patient-reported outcomes assessment in cancer clinical trials: a patient-reported outcomes measurement information system initiative.在癌症临床试验中规范患者报告结局评估:患者报告结局测量信息系统倡议
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Nov 10;25(32):5106-12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.2341.

引用本文的文献

1
The hemophilia quality of life scale: a systematic review.血友病生活质量量表:系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 6;12:1294188. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1294188. eCollection 2024.
2
Outcome Measures and Patient-Reported Metrics in Cancer Rehabilitation.癌症康复中的结局指标与患者报告指标
Curr Oncol Rep. 2023 Aug;25(8):869-882. doi: 10.1007/s11912-023-01412-6. Epub 2023 May 6.
3
Clinical Outcome Assessment in Cancer Rehabilitation and the Central Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes.癌症康复中的临床结局评估以及患者报告结局的核心作用。
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Dec 24;14(1):84. doi: 10.3390/cancers14010084.
4
Clinical and psychometric validation of the BreSAS questionnaire module for symptom assessment among breast cancer survivors.BreSAS 问卷模块用于评估乳腺癌幸存者症状的临床和心理计量学验证。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Mar;28(3):1051-1058. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04905-y. Epub 2019 Jun 8.
5
Complex abdominal wall hernias as a barrier to quality of life in cancer survivors.复杂腹壁疝对癌症幸存者生活质量的阻碍
Can J Surg. 2019 Mar 22;62(3):1-7. doi: 10.1503/cjs.014917.
6
An explorative study on systematic assessment of QOL and care needs with the CARES-SF in the early follow-up of patients with digestive cancer.采用 CARES-SF 在消化系统癌症患者早期随访中对生活质量和护理需求进行系统评估的探索性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Jul;27(7):2715-2724. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4565-7. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
7
Acceptance, social support, benefit-finding, and depression in women with gynecological cancer.妇科癌症女性的接纳、社会支持、受益发现与抑郁。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Nov;27(11):2991-3002. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1953-x. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
8
Validation of the flemish CARES, a quality of life and needs assessment tool for cancer care.验证佛兰芒CARES,一种癌症护理生活质量和需求评估工具。
BMC Cancer. 2016 Aug 30;16(1):696. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2728-9.
9
Assessing cancer patients' quality of life and supportive care needs: Translation-revalidation of the CARES in Flemish and exhaustive evaluation of concurrent validity.评估癌症患者的生活质量和支持性护理需求:《癌症患者支持性护理需求评估量表》佛兰德语版的翻译再验证及同时效度的详尽评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Mar 11;16:86. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1335-4.
10
Body Image in Younger Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review.年轻乳腺癌幸存者的身体意象:一项系统综述
Cancer Nurs. 2016 Jan-Feb;39(1):E39-58. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000251.