Department of Dentistry/Periodontology, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Dec;22(12):1391-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02127.x. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
This study was designed to evaluate the effect of bone graft materials and collagen membranes in ridge splitting procedures with immediate implant placement using a dog model.
Mandibular premolars were extracted in five beagle dogs. After 3 months, ridge splitting and placement of three OsseoSpeed implants were performed bilaterally. The gaps between the implants were allocated according to the following eight treatment modalities; Group 1(no graft), Group 2 (autogenous bone), Group 3 (Bio-Oss Collagen), Group 4 (Bio-Oss), Group 5 (no graft+BioGide), Group 6 (autogenous bone+BioGide), Group 7 (Bio-Oss Collagen+BioGide), and Group 8 (Bio-Oss +BioGide). The dogs were sacrificed after 8 or 12 weeks and the specimens were analyzed histologically and histometrically.
The gaps between the implants were filled with the newly formed bone, irrespective of which of the eight grafting techniques was used. Group 1 revealed a significantly lower percentage of bone-to-implant contact (BIC) than Group 5 at 8 and 12 weeks (P<0.05). Group 1 showed the most prominent marginal bone loss (MBL) at 12 weeks (P<0.05). Regarding the use of membranes, Groups 1 and 2 showed significantly more MBL than Groups 5 and 6 at 12 weeks (P<0.05).
After ridge splitting, if the gaps between implants were grafted or covered with collagen membranes, a higher percentage of BIC was obtained. Based on our results, we suggest that the use of bone graft materials and/or collagen membranes is better for the prevention of MBL after ridge splitting procedures.
本研究旨在通过犬模型评估在即刻种植体植入的牙槽嵴劈开术中使用骨移植材料和胶原膜的效果。
在 5 只比格犬中拔除下颌前磨牙。3 个月后,双侧行牙槽嵴劈开术并植入 3 颗 OsseoSpeed 种植体。根据以下 8 种治疗方式分配种植体之间的间隙:第 1 组(无移植)、第 2 组(自体骨)、第 3 组(Bio-Oss Collagen)、第 4 组(Bio-Oss)、第 5 组(无移植+BioGide)、第 6 组(自体骨+BioGide)、第 7 组(Bio-Oss Collagen+BioGide)和第 8 组(Bio-Oss+BioGide)。8 或 12 周后处死犬,对标本进行组织学和组织计量学分析。
无论使用哪种 8 种移植技术,种植体之间的间隙均被新形成的骨填充。第 1 组在 8 周和 12 周时的骨-种植体接触率(BIC)明显低于第 5 组(P<0.05)。第 1 组在 12 周时表现出最明显的边缘骨丧失(MBL)(P<0.05)。关于使用膜,第 1 组和第 2 组在 12 周时的 MBL 明显高于第 5 组和第 6 组(P<0.05)。
在牙槽嵴劈开后,如果用骨移植材料或胶原膜填充种植体之间的间隙,BIC 的百分比会更高。根据我们的结果,我们建议在牙槽嵴劈开术后使用骨移植材料和/或胶原膜更有利于预防 MBL。