Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridge, UK.
Brief Funct Genomics. 2011 Mar;10(2):52-60. doi: 10.1093/bfgp/elr008.
In recent years, the search for genetic determinants of type 2 diabetes (T2D) has changed dramatically. Although linkage and small-scale candidate gene studies were highly successful in the identification of genes, which, when mutated, caused monogenic forms of T2D, they were largely unsuccessful when applied to the more common forms of the disease. To date, these approaches have only identified two loci (PPARG, KCNJ11) robustly implicated in T2D susceptibility. The ability to perform large-scale association analysis, including genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in many thousands of samples from different populations, and subsequently, the shift to form large international collaborations to perform meta-analyses across many studies has taken the number of independent loci showing genome-wide significant associations with T2D to 44. This number includes six loci identified initially through the analysis of quantitative glycaemic phenotypes, illustrating the usefulness of this approach both to identify new disease genes and gain insight into the mechanisms leading to disease. Combined, these loci still only account for ∼10% of the observed familial clustering in Europeans, leaving much of the variance unexplained. In this review, we will describe what GWAS have taught us about the genetic basis of T2D and discuss possible next steps to uncover the remaining heritability.
近年来,对 2 型糖尿病(T2D)遗传决定因素的研究发生了巨大变化。虽然连锁和小规模候选基因研究在鉴定基因突变导致单基因 T2D 方面非常成功,但在应用于更常见的 T2D 形式时,它们基本上没有成功。迄今为止,这些方法仅鉴定了两个与 T2D 易感性密切相关的基因座(PPARG、KCNJ11)。能够进行大规模的关联分析,包括来自不同人群的数千个样本的全基因组关联研究(GWAS),随后形成大型国际合作进行多项研究的荟萃分析,已经将与 T2D 具有全基因组显著关联的独立基因座数量增加到 44 个。这一数字包括最初通过分析定量血糖表型鉴定的六个基因座,这说明了这种方法在鉴定新的疾病基因和深入了解导致疾病的机制方面的有用性。这些基因座加在一起,在欧洲人中仍然只占观察到的家族聚集的约 10%,还有很大一部分差异尚未得到解释。在这篇综述中,我们将描述 GWAS 告诉我们关于 T2D 遗传基础的知识,并讨论揭示剩余遗传率的可能下一步措施。