Department of Oncology, Shanghai Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200127, China.
J Hematol Oncol. 2011 Mar 26;4:11. doi: 10.1186/1756-8722-4-11.
The objectives of the present study are to investigate the efficacy and safety profile of gemcitabine-based combinations in the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LA/MPC).
We performed a computerized search using combinations of the following keywords: "chemotherapy", "gemcitabine", "trial", and "pancreatic cancer".
Thirty-five trials were included in the present analysis, with a total of 9,979 patients accrued. The analysis showed that the gemcitabine-based combination therapy was associated with significantly better overall survival (OS) (ORs, 1.15; p = 0.011), progression-free survival (PFS) (ORs, 1.27; p < 0.001), and overall response rate (ORR) (ORs, 1.58; p < 0.001) than gemcitabine monotherapy. Similar results were obtained when the gemcitabine-fluoropyrimidine combination was compared with gemcitabine, with the OS (ORs, 1.33; p = 0.007), PFS (ORs, 1.53; p < 0.001), and ORR (ORs 1.47, p = 0.03) being better in the case of the former. The OS (ORs, 1.33; p = 0.019), PFS (ORs, 1.38; p = 0.011), and one-year survival (ORs, 1.40; p = 0.04) achieved with the gemcitabine-oxaliplatin combination were significantly greater than those achieved with gemcitabine alone. However, no survival benefit (OS: ORs, 1.01, p = 0.93; PFS: ORs, 1.19, p = 0.17) was noted when the gemcitabine-cisplatin combination was compared to gemcitabine monotherapy. The combinations of gemcitabine and other cytotoxic agents also afforded disappointing results. Our analysis indicated that the ORR improved when patients were treated with the gemcitabine-camptothecin combination rather than gemcitabine alone (ORs, 2.03; p = 0.003); however, there were no differences in the OS (ORs, 1.03; p = 0.82) and PFS (ORs, 0.97; p = 0.78) in this case.
Gemcitabine in combination with capecitabine or oxaliplatin was associated with enhanced OS and ORR as compared with gemcitabine in monotherapy, which are likely to become the preferred standard first-line treatment of LA/MPC.
本研究旨在探讨吉西他滨联合方案治疗局部晚期和转移性胰腺腺癌(LA/MPC)的疗效和安全性。
我们使用以下关键词的组合进行了计算机检索:“化疗”、“吉西他滨”、“试验”和“胰腺癌”。
本分析共纳入 35 项试验,共纳入 9979 例患者。分析显示,与吉西他滨单药治疗相比,吉西他滨联合方案治疗可显著提高总生存期(OS)(ORs,1.15;p=0.011)、无进展生存期(PFS)(ORs,1.27;p<0.001)和总缓解率(ORR)(ORs,1.58;p<0.001)。与吉西他滨相比,吉西他滨-氟嘧啶联合方案也显示出更好的 OS(ORs,1.33;p=0.007)、PFS(ORs,1.53;p<0.001)和 ORR(ORs,1.47,p=0.03)。吉西他滨-奥沙利铂联合方案的 OS(ORs,1.33;p=0.019)、PFS(ORs,1.38;p=0.011)和一年生存率(ORs,1.40;p=0.04)均显著高于吉西他滨单药治疗。然而,吉西他滨-顺铂联合方案与吉西他滨单药治疗相比,无生存获益(OS:ORs,1.01,p=0.93;PFS:ORs,1.19,p=0.17)。吉西他滨与其他细胞毒性药物的联合应用也未能取得令人满意的结果。我们的分析表明,与吉西他滨单药治疗相比,吉西他滨联合卡培他滨治疗可提高缓解率(ORs,2.03;p=0.003),但 OS(ORs,1.03;p=0.82)和 PFS(ORs,0.97;p=0.78)无差异。
与吉西他滨单药治疗相比,吉西他滨联合卡培他滨或奥沙利铂治疗可提高 OS 和 ORR,有望成为 LA/MPC 的首选一线治疗标准。