Suppr超能文献

胰腺腺癌三线系统治疗:一项回顾性队列研究。

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma third line systemic treatments: a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Département de médecine oncologique, Gustave Roussy, 94800, Villejuif, France.

Université Paris Saclay, 91471, Orsay, France.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2024 Feb 26;24(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12016-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) primarily relies on FOLFIRINOX (LV5FU- irinotecan - Oxaliplatine) and Gemcitabine - Nab-Paclitaxel in the first-line setting. However, second-lines remain less well-defined and there is limited data regarding third-line treatments. The objective of our study was to determine the proportion of patients advancing to third line chemotherapy, to outline the various third-line chemotherapy regimens used in routine practice and to evaluate their respective efficacy.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center cohort from 2010-2022 compiled baseline characteristics, treatment outcomes and survival of PDAC patients who received at least one chemotherapy line in a French tertiary-center. Overall survivals (OS) were analyzed using a Cox multivariable model.

RESULTS

In total, 676 patients were included, with a median follow-up time of 69.4 months, (Interquartile Range (IQR) = 72.1). Of these, 251 patients (37%) that proceeded to 3-line chemotherapy. The median PFS in 3 line was 2.03 months, [CI95%: 1.83, 2.36]. The median 3 line overall survival was 5.5 months, [CI95%: 4.8, 6.3]. In multivariable analysis erlotinib-based chemotherapy was found to be deleterious (HR=2.38, [CI95%: 1.30, 4.34], p=0.005) compared to fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in terms of 3 line overall survival while gemcitabine monotherapy showed a tendency towards negative outcomes. First and 2 line chemotherapies sequence didn't influence 3 line outcome.

CONCLUSION

In our cohort, one-third of treated patients proceeded to 3 line chemotherapy resulting in a 5.5 months median 3 line OS, consistent with treatments at advanced stage. Our results argue against the use of erlotinib and gemcitabine monotherapy.

摘要

背景

转移性胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)的化疗主要依赖于 FOLFIRINOX(LV5FU-伊立替康-奥沙利铂)和吉西他滨- Nab-紫杉醇作为一线治疗。然而,二线治疗仍不明确,三线治疗的数据有限。我们的研究目的是确定进展至三线化疗的患者比例,概述常规实践中使用的各种三线化疗方案,并评估它们各自的疗效。

方法

回顾性分析了 2010 年至 2022 年在法国一家三级中心接受至少一线化疗的 PDAC 患者的基线特征、治疗结果和生存情况。使用 Cox 多变量模型分析总生存期(OS)。

结果

共纳入 676 例患者,中位随访时间为 69.4 个月(IQR=72.1)。其中 251 例(37%)患者接受了三线化疗。三线化疗的中位无进展生存期(PFS)为 2.03 个月[95%CI:1.83,2.36]。三线化疗的中位总生存期为 5.5 个月[95%CI:4.8,6.3]。多变量分析发现,与氟嘧啶类化疗相比,厄洛替尼为基础的化疗在三线总生存方面具有不利影响(HR=2.38,95%CI:1.30,4.34,p=0.005),而吉西他滨单药治疗则显示出负面结果的趋势。一线和二线化疗方案的顺序不影响三线治疗结果。

结论

在我们的队列中,三分之一的治疗患者进展至三线化疗,导致三线治疗的中位总生存期为 5.5 个月,与晚期治疗一致。我们的结果反对使用厄洛替尼和吉西他滨单药治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db39/10898186/b75fd5068cdc/12885_2024_12016_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验