Drabick Deborah A G, Ollendick Thomas H, Bubier Jennifer L
Temple University.
Clin Psychol (New York). 2010 Dec 1;17(4):307-318. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2850.2010.01222.x.
Although oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) and anxiety disorders (ADs) often co-occur, the literature is mixed regarding the effects of such co-occurrence. For example, there is evidence that AD symptoms may mitigate ODD symptoms (buffer hypothesis) or exacerbate ODD symptoms (multiple problem hypothesis). A dual-pathway model incorporates previous research and addresses both hypotheses. We describe several possible etiological or risk processes that may underlie each of these ODD-AD pathways, including child temperament, aggression, limbic system processes, executive functioning abilities, and social information-processing biases, and suggest an integrated model. We conclude with implications for the model and directions for future research involving co-occurring ODD and ADs.
尽管对立违抗障碍(ODD)和焦虑症(ADs)常常同时出现,但关于这种共病的影响,文献中的观点并不一致。例如,有证据表明,焦虑症症状可能减轻对立违抗障碍症状(缓冲假说),或者加剧对立违抗障碍症状(多重问题假说)。一个双路径模型整合了先前的研究,并探讨了这两种假说。我们描述了几种可能构成这些对立违抗障碍 - 焦虑症路径基础的病因或风险过程,包括儿童气质、攻击性、边缘系统过程、执行功能能力和社会信息加工偏差,并提出了一个综合模型。我们最后阐述了该模型的意义以及未来关于对立违抗障碍和焦虑症共病研究的方向。