Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Reykjavik University, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland.
Centre of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 15;20(4):3405. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043405.
Conduct problems and anxiety symptoms commonly co-occur among youths with oppositional defiant disorder (ODD); however, how these symptoms influence functioning and treatment outcomes remains unclear. This study examined subtypes based on these co-occurring symptoms in a clinical sample of 134 youths (M = 9.67, 36.6% female, 83.6% white) with ODD and the predictive power of these subgroups for youth functioning and psychosocial treatment outcomes. The latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to identify subgroups based on parent- and self-reported conduct problems and anxiety symptoms. Differences among the subgroups in clinician-, parent-, and/or self-reported accounts of symptom severity, school performance, underlying processing known to be impaired across ODD, conduct and anxiety disorders, self-concept, and psychosocial treatment outcomes were examined. Four distinct profiles were identified: (1) Low Anxiety/Moderate Conduct Problems ( = 42); (2) High Anxiety/Moderate Conduct Problems ( = 33); (3) Moderate Anxiety/Moderate Conduct Problems ( = 40); and (4) Moderate Anxiety/High Conduct Problems ( = 19). The Moderate Anxiety/High Conduct Problems group exhibited more severe behavioral problems, greater difficulties with negative emotionality, emotional self-control, and executive functioning; they also demonstrated worse long-term treatment outcomes than the other subgroups. These findings suggest more homogeneous subgroups within and across diagnostic categories may result in a deeper understanding of ODD and could inform nosological systems and intervention efforts.
对立违抗障碍(ODD)患儿中常同时存在品行问题和焦虑症状;然而,这些症状如何影响其功能和治疗结局尚不清楚。本研究在一个包含 134 名 ODD 患儿的临床样本(M=9.67,36.6%为女性,83.6%为白人)中,根据这些共病症状对亚型进行了研究,并考察了这些亚组对患儿功能和心理社会治疗结局的预测能力。采用潜在剖面分析(LPA)根据父母报告和自我报告的品行问题和焦虑症状来识别亚组。考察了亚组间在症状严重程度、学业表现、潜在处理过程(ODD 及品行和焦虑障碍共有的认知损伤过程)、自我概念以及心理社会治疗结局方面的临床医生、父母和/或自我报告的差异。共确定了 4 种不同的亚组:(1)低焦虑/中度品行问题(n=42);(2)高焦虑/中度品行问题(n=33);(3)中度焦虑/中度品行问题(n=40);和(4)中度焦虑/高度品行问题(n=19)。高度焦虑/高度品行问题亚组表现出更严重的行为问题,更严重的负性情绪、情绪自我控制和执行功能困难,其长期治疗结局也比其他亚组差。这些发现提示在诊断类别内和跨诊断类别可能存在更同质的亚组,从而可以深入了解 ODD,并为分类系统和干预措施提供信息。