• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗糖尿病治疗与心肌梗死住院风险:一项全国性病例对照研究。

Antidiabetic treatments and risk of hospitalisation with myocardial infarction: a nationwide case-control study.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Apr;20(4):331-7. doi: 10.1002/pds.2097. Epub 2011 Jan 10.

DOI:10.1002/pds.2097
PMID:21442682
Abstract

PURPOSE

Data on cardiovascular risk associated with different types of antidiabetic treatments are sparse and conflicting. We examined the risk of hospitalisation with myocardial infarction (MI) among patients treated with sulfonylureas, metformin, insulin, any combination and no antidiabetic pharmacotherapy.

METHODS

Using nationwide registries, we conducted a population-based nested case-control study among all patients with type 2 diabetes in Denmark and identified all patients hospitalised with a first-time MI and age- and gender-matched non-MI controls in the period 1996-2004. We estimated odds ratios (ORs) of MI according to type of antidiabetic treatment, adjusted for potential confounding factors using patients treated with sulfonylureas as the reference group.

RESULTS

A total of 10,616 type 2 diabetic cases hospitalised with MI and 90,697 type 2 diabetic non-MI controls were available for analysis. We found a lower risk of hospitalisation with MI among users of metformin (adjusted OR = 0.86, 95%CI: 0.78-0.95), insulin (adjusted OR = 0.92, 95%CI: 0.86-0.99) and among patients not receiving any antidiabetic pharmacotherapy (adjusted OR = 0.75, 95%CI: 0.71-0.79) compared with users of sulfonylureas. Users of any combination had similar risk as users of sulfonylureas (adjusted OR = 0.99, 95%CI: 0.92-1.06). We found no differences between individual sulfonylureas, and glycaemic control and lipid profile had only minor impact on the risk estimates in subanalyses including HbA(1c) , cholesterol and triglycerides.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings provide some support for the hypothesis that sulfonylureas may be associated with an increased risk of hospitalisation with MI.

摘要

目的

关于不同类型抗糖尿病治疗与心血管风险的相关数据较为匮乏且相互矛盾。我们研究了丹麦所有 2 型糖尿病患者中,使用磺酰脲类、二甲双胍、胰岛素、任何联合治疗以及未进行任何抗糖尿病药物治疗的患者发生心肌梗死(MI)住院的风险。

方法

利用全国性登记处,我们对丹麦的所有 2 型糖尿病患者进行了一项基于人群的巢式病例对照研究,确定了在 1996 年至 2004 年期间首次因 MI 住院的患者以及年龄和性别相匹配的非 MI 对照组。我们根据抗糖尿病治疗类型估计了 MI 的比值比(OR),使用磺酰脲类作为参考组,通过调整潜在混杂因素来调整 OR。

结果

共纳入 10616 例 2 型糖尿病并发 MI 住院患者和 90697 例 2 型糖尿病非 MI 对照组。我们发现,与使用磺酰脲类药物的患者相比,使用二甲双胍(调整 OR=0.86,95%CI:0.78-0.95)、胰岛素(调整 OR=0.92,95%CI:0.86-0.99)以及未接受任何抗糖尿病药物治疗的患者(调整 OR=0.75,95%CI:0.71-0.79)的 MI 住院风险较低。与使用磺酰脲类药物的患者相比,任何联合治疗药物的使用患者的风险相似(调整 OR=0.99,95%CI:0.92-1.06)。我们没有发现个体磺酰脲类药物之间的差异,并且血糖控制和血脂谱在包括 HbA1c、胆固醇和甘油三酯在内的亚分析中对风险估计的影响较小。

结论

我们的研究结果为磺酰脲类药物可能与 MI 住院风险增加相关的假说提供了一些支持。

相似文献

1
Antidiabetic treatments and risk of hospitalisation with myocardial infarction: a nationwide case-control study.抗糖尿病治疗与心肌梗死住院风险:一项全国性病例对照研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Apr;20(4):331-7. doi: 10.1002/pds.2097. Epub 2011 Jan 10.
2
Coronary heart disease outcomes in patients receiving antidiabetic agents.接受抗糖尿病药物治疗患者的冠心病转归
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007 Jul;16(7):711-25. doi: 10.1002/pds.1443.
3
Type of preadmission antidiabetic treatment and outcome among patients with ischemic stroke: a nationwide follow-up study.入院前抗糖尿病治疗类型与缺血性脑卒中患者结局的关系:一项全国性随访研究。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012 Nov;21(8):717-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.03.007. Epub 2011 May 4.
4
Summaries for patients. How do older diabetes drugs compare in their effects on heart and blood vessel disease?患者摘要。较老的糖尿病药物对心脏和血管疾病的影响有何不同?
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Nov 6;157(9):I-28. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-9-201211060-00001.
5
Diabetes patients requiring glucose-lowering therapy and nondiabetics with a prior myocardial infarction carry the same cardiovascular risk: a population study of 3.3 million people.需要降糖治疗的糖尿病患者与既往有心肌梗死的非糖尿病患者具有相同的心血管风险:一项对330万人的人群研究。
Circulation. 2008 Apr 15;117(15):1945-54. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.720847. Epub 2008 Mar 31.
6
Case-control study of second-line therapies for type 2 diabetes in combination with metformin and the comparative risks of myocardial infarction and stroke.2型糖尿病二线治疗联合二甲双胍的病例对照研究及心肌梗死和中风的比较风险
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Dec;17(12):1194-7. doi: 10.1111/dom.12537. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
7
A comparison of select cardiovascular outcomes by antidiabetic prescription drug classes used to treat type 2 diabetes among Military Health System beneficiaries, fiscal year 2003-2006.2003 - 2006财年军事卫生系统受益人中用于治疗2型糖尿病的抗糖尿病处方药类别对特定心血管结局的比较。
Am J Ther. 2008 May-Jun;15(3):198-205. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e31817534d5.
8
Sulfonylureas and prognosis after myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes: a population-based follow-up study.磺脲类药物与糖尿病患者心肌梗死后的预后:一项基于人群的随访研究。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2009 Sep;25(6):515-22. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.971.
9
Sulfonylureas and the risk of myocardial infarction.磺脲类药物与心肌梗死风险
Metabolism. 2006 May;55(5 Suppl 1):S16-9. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2006.02.004.
10
Mortality and cardiovascular risk associated with different insulin secretagogues compared with metformin in type 2 diabetes, with or without a previous myocardial infarction: a nationwide study.与二甲双胍相比,不同胰岛素促分泌剂在有或无既往心肌梗死的 2 型糖尿病患者中的死亡率和心血管风险:一项全国性研究。
Eur Heart J. 2011 Aug;32(15):1900-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr077. Epub 2011 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Temporally ordered associations between type 2 diabetes and brain disorders - a Danish register-based cohort study.2 型糖尿病与脑疾病之间的时间顺序关联 - 一项丹麦基于登记的队列研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 26;22(1):573. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04163-z.
2
Systematic assessment of prescribed medications and short-term risk of myocardial infarction - a pharmacopeia-wide association study from Norway and Sweden.系统评估处方药物与心肌梗死短期风险的相关性——来自挪威和瑞典的药物学范围关联性研究。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 4;9(1):8257. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44641-1.
3
Cardiovascular risk associated with the use of glitazones, metformin and sufonylureas: meta-analysis of published observational studies.
与使用格列酮类、二甲双胍和磺脲类药物相关的心血管风险:已发表观察性研究的荟萃分析
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Jan 15;16:14. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0187-5.
4
Observational studies of the association between glucose-lowering medications and cardiovascular outcomes: addressing methodological limitations.降糖药物与心血管结局关联的观察性研究:应对方法学局限性
Diabetologia. 2014 Nov;57(11):2237-50. doi: 10.1007/s00125-014-3364-z. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
5
Assessing the impact of propensity score estimation and implementation on covariate balance and confounding control within and across important subgroups in comparative effectiveness research.评估倾向评分估计和实施对比较有效性研究中重要亚组内和跨亚组的协变量平衡和混杂控制的影响。
Med Care. 2014 Mar;52(3):280-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000064.
6
Association of hypoglycemic treatment regimens with cardiovascular outcomes in overweight and obese subjects with type 2 diabetes: a substudy of the SCOUT trial.2型糖尿病超重和肥胖受试者低血糖治疗方案与心血管结局的关联:SCOUT试验的一项子研究
Diabetes Care. 2013 Nov;36(11):3746-53. doi: 10.2337/dc13-0027. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
7
Preadmission metformin use and mortality among intensive care patients with diabetes: a cohort study.糖尿病重症监护患者入院前二甲双胍使用情况与死亡率:一项队列研究
Crit Care. 2013 Sep 9;17(5):R192. doi: 10.1186/cc12886.
8
Effects of a vildagliptin/metformin combination on markers of atherosclerosis, thrombosis, and inflammation in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease.维格列汀/二甲双胍联合治疗对合并冠心病的糖尿病患者动脉粥样硬化、血栓形成和炎症标志物的影响。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2012 Jun 6;11:60. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-11-60.