• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分系统在肝移植中应用后的影响。

Impact of the MELD allocation after its implementation in liver transplantation.

作者信息

Benckert Christoph, Quante Markus, Thelen Armin, Bartels Michael, Laudi Sven, Berg Thomas, Kaisers Udo, Jonas Sven

机构信息

Department of Visceral, Transplantation, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Scand J Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul;46(7-8):941-8. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2011.568521. Epub 2011 Mar 28.

DOI:10.3109/00365521.2011.568521
PMID:21443420
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

On 16 December 2006, most Eurotransplant countries changed waiting time oriented liver allocation policy to the urgency oriented Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) system. There are limited data on the effects of this policy change within the Eurotransplant community.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 154 patients who had undergone deceased donor liver transplantation (LT) were retrospectively analyzed in three time periods: period A (1-year pre-MELD, n = 42) versus period B (1-year post-MELD, n = 52) versus period C (2 years after MELD implementation, n = 60).

RESULTS

The median MELD score at the time of LT increased from 16.3 points in period A to 22.4 and 20.4 in periods B and C, respectively (p = 0.007). Waitlist mortality decreased from 18.4% in period A to 10.4% and 9.4% in periods B and C, respectively (p = 0.015). Three-month mortality did not change significantly (10% each for periods A, B and C). One-year survival was 84% for the MELD 6-19 group compared with 81% in the MELD 20-29 group and 74% in the MELD ≥30 group (p = 0.823). Analyzing MELD score and previously described prognostic scores [i.e. survival after liver transplantation (SALT) score and donor-MELD (D-MELD) score] with regard to 1-year survival, only a high risk SALT score was predictive (p = 0.038). In our center, 2 years after implementation of the MELD system, waitlist mortality decreased, while 90-day mortality did not change significantly.

CONCLUSION

Up to now, only the SALT score proved to be of prognostic relevance post-transplant.

摘要

目的

2006年12月16日,多数欧洲移植国家将基于等待时间的肝脏分配政策转变为基于紧急程度的终末期肝病模型(MELD)系统。关于这一政策变化在欧洲移植群体中的影响,相关数据有限。

患者与方法

回顾性分析了154例接受尸体供肝移植(LT)的患者,分为三个时间段:A期(MELD系统实施前1年,n = 42)、B期(MELD系统实施后1年,n = 52)和C期(MELD系统实施2年后,n = 60)。

结果

LT时的MELD评分中位数从A期的16.3分分别增至B期的22.4分和C期的20.4分(p = 0.007)。等待名单上的死亡率从A期的18.4%分别降至B期的10.4%和C期的9.4%(p = 0.015)。三个月死亡率无显著变化(A、B、C期均为10%)。MELD 6 - 19组的1年生存率为84%,MELD 20 - 29组为81%,MELD≥30组为74%(p = 0.823)。分析MELD评分以及先前描述的预后评分[即肝移植后生存率(SALT)评分和供体MELD(D - MELD)评分]与1年生存率的关系,只有高风险SALT评分具有预测性(p = 0.038)。在我们中心,MELD系统实施2年后,等待名单上的死亡率降低,而90天死亡率无显著变化。

结论

到目前为止,只有SALT评分在移植后具有预后相关性。

相似文献

1
Impact of the MELD allocation after its implementation in liver transplantation.终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分系统在肝移植中应用后的影响。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul;46(7-8):941-8. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2011.568521. Epub 2011 Mar 28.
2
Survival on waiting list for liver transplantation before and after introduction of the model for end-stage liver disease score.终末期肝病模型评分引入前后肝移植等待名单上的生存率
Transplant Proc. 2010 Mar;42(2):407-11. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.01.005.
3
Improved waiting-list outcomes in Argentina after the adoption of a model for end-stage liver disease-based liver allocation policy.阿根廷采用终末期肝病模型为基础的肝脏分配政策后,等待名单结果得到改善。
Liver Transpl. 2013 Jul;19(7):711-20. doi: 10.1002/lt.23665.
4
Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers.终末期肝病模型(MELD)与供肝分配
Gastroenterology. 2003 Jan;124(1):91-6. doi: 10.1053/gast.2003.50016.
5
Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: the MELD impact.肝细胞癌的肝移植:终末期肝病模型(MELD)的影响
Liver Transpl. 2004 Jan;10(1):36-41. doi: 10.1002/lt.20012.
6
Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score and organ allocation from cadaveric donors for 198 liver transplantation procedures performed in a single center.在一个单一中心进行的198例肝移植手术中,终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分与尸体供体的器官分配情况。
Transplant Proc. 2008 Jul-Aug;40(6):1903-5. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.05.016.
7
Developments in pediatric liver transplantation since implementation of the new allocation rules in Eurotransplant.自欧洲移植组织实施新的分配规则以来小儿肝移植的发展情况。
Clin Transplant. 2014 Sep;28(9):1061-8. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12420. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
8
Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score does not predict patient or graft survival in living donor liver transplant recipients.终末期肝病模型评分不能预测活体肝移植受者的患者或移植物存活率。
Liver Transpl. 2003 Jul;9(7):737-40. doi: 10.1053/jlts.2003.50122.
9
Testing liver allocation in São Paulo, Brazil: the relationship of model for end-stage liver disease implementation with a reduction in waiting-list mortality.巴西圣保罗的肝脏分配测试:终末期肝病模型实施与等待名单死亡率降低之间的关系。
Transplant Proc. 2012 Oct;44(8):2283-5. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.07.045.
10
Could metabolic liver function tests predict mortality on waiting list for liver transplantation? A study on 560 patients.代谢肝功能试验能否预测肝移植等待名单上的死亡率?一项 560 例患者的研究。
Clin Transplant. 2011 Sep-Oct;25(5):755-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2010.01366.x. Epub 2010 Dec 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Perioperative clinical practice in liver transplantation: a cross-sectional survey.肝移植围手术期临床实践:横断面调查。
Can J Anaesth. 2023 Jul;70(7):1155-1166. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02499-y. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
2
Models to predict the short-term survival of acute-on-chronic liver failure patients following liver transplantation.预测肝移植后慢加急性肝衰竭患者短期生存的模型。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Feb 23;22(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02164-6.
3
The Effects of MELD-Based Liver Allocation on Patient Survival and Waiting List Mortality in a Country with a Low Donation Rate.
在一个低捐赠率国家,基于终末期肝病模型(MELD)的肝脏分配对患者生存率和等待名单死亡率的影响。
J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 19;9(6):1929. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061929.
4
Cancer and liver cirrhosis: implications on prognosis and management.癌症与肝硬化:对预后及治疗的影响
ESMO Open. 2016 Mar 17;1(2):e000042. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000042. eCollection 2016.
5
Single-Center Experience on Liver Transplantation for Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score 40 Patients.终末期肝病模型评分40分患者肝移植的单中心经验
Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Nov;61(11):3346-3353. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4274-3. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
6
Impact of MELD Allocation System on Waiting List and Early Post-Liver Transplant Mortality.终末期肝病模型(MELD)分配系统对等待名单及肝移植术后早期死亡率的影响
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 14;11(6):e0155822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155822. eCollection 2016.
7
Model for end-stage liver disease score and MELD exceptions: 15 years later.终末期肝病模型评分与MELD例外情况:15年后
Hepatol Int. 2015 Jul;9(3):346-54. doi: 10.1007/s12072-015-9631-3. Epub 2015 May 28.
8
Prediction of postoperative mortality in liver transplantation in the era of MELD-based liver allocation: a multivariate analysis.基于 MELD 评分的肝分配时代肝移植术后死亡率的预测:多变量分析。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 6;9(6):e98782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098782. eCollection 2014.
9
Experience Since MELD Implementation: How Does the New System Deliver?自实施终末期肝病模型(MELD)以来的经验:新系统的效果如何?
Int J Hepatol. 2012;2012:264015. doi: 10.1155/2012/264015. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
10
Defining readmission risk factors for liver transplantation recipients.确定肝移植受者再次入院的风险因素。
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2011 Sep;7(9):585-90.