• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Influence of different post-core systems on impact stress: a pilot study.不同桩核系统对冲击应力的影响:一项初步研究。
Open Dent J. 2013 Nov 29;7:162-8. doi: 10.2174/1874210601307010162. eCollection 2013.
2
In vitro comparison of endodontic posts in structurally compromised roots of maxillary incisors.上颌切牙结构受损牙根中根管桩的体外比较
SADJ. 2011 Jun;66(5):220-3.
3
Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber reinforced posts and cast gold post and cores cemented with three cements.三种黏固剂黏固的玻璃纤维增强桩核和铸造金桩核修复的根管治疗后牙的抗折性能。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Aug;110(2):127-33. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60352-2.
4
Effects of post core materials on stress distribution in the restoration of mandibular second premolars: a finite element analysis.桩核材料对下颌第二前磨牙修复体应力分布的影响:有限元分析
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Sep;112(3):547-54. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.12.006. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
5
Survival of extensively damaged endodontically treated incisors restored with different types of posts-and-core foundation restoration material.不同类型桩核基础修复材料修复的严重受损根管治疗后切牙的存活率。
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 May;119(5):769-776. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.05.012. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
6
Finite element analysis of weakened roots restored with composite resin and posts.复合树脂和桩修复薄弱根的有限元分析。
Dent Mater J. 2009 Nov;28(6):671-8. doi: 10.4012/dmj.28.671.
7
Fracture strength and nanoleakage of weakened roots reconstructed using relined glass fiber-reinforced dowels combined with a novel prefabricated core system.使用重衬玻璃纤维增强桩和新型预制核系统修复后的弱根的断裂强度和纳米渗漏。
J Prosthodont. 2014 Aug;23(6):484-94. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12139. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
8
Clinical evaluation of carbon fiber reinforced carbon endodontic post, glass fiber reinforced post with cast post and core: A one year comparative clinical study.碳纤维增强碳根管桩、玻璃纤维增强桩与铸造桩核的临床评价:一项为期一年的对比临床研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2008 Oct;11(4):162-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.48841.
9
Effect of the crown, post, and remaining coronal dentin on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors.牙冠、桩核及剩余牙本质对上颌中切牙牙体牙髓治疗后生物力学行为的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Mar;111(3):234-46. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.006. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
10
Effect of fiber post and cusp coverage on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars directly restored with composite resin.纤维桩和牙尖覆盖对用复合树脂直接修复的根管治疗上颌前磨牙抗折性的影响。
J Endod. 2009 Oct;35(10):1428-32. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.07.010. Epub 2009 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Biomechanical Assessment of Tilted Mandibular Second Molars with Full-Crown Adjacent to Implant-Supported Restoration: 3D Finite Element Analysis.种植体支持修复体邻接全冠修复倾斜下颌第二磨牙的生物力学评估:三维有限元分析
Int J Gen Med. 2022 Mar 29;15:3459-3470. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S353134. eCollection 2022.
2
Fracture Resistance of Tilted Premolars Restored with Different Post-Core Systems.不同桩核系统修复倾斜前磨牙的抗折性
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017 Nov-Dec;7(6):344-350. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_382_17. Epub 2017 Dec 29.

本文引用的文献

1
A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post core systems - an in-vitro study.不同桩核系统修复的根管治疗后牙抗折性能的比较评价——一项体外研究。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2011 Jun;3(2):90-5. doi: 10.4047/jap.2011.3.2.90. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
2
Fracture load of tooth restored with fiber post and experimental short fiber composite.用纤维桩和实验性短纤维复合材料修复的牙齿的断裂载荷。
Open Dent J. 2011 Mar 29;5:58-65. doi: 10.2174/1874210601105010058.
3
Influence of pre-laminated material on shock absorption ability in specially designed mouthguard with hard insert and space.预层压材料对带有硬插入物和空间的特殊设计的口腔防护器的减震能力的影响。
J Prosthodont Res. 2011 Oct;55(4):214-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2011.02.003. Epub 2011 Mar 27.
4
A retrospective study of 889 injured permanent teeth.889 颗受伤恒牙的回顾性研究。
Dent Traumatol. 2010 Dec;26(6):466-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2010.00924.x. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
5
Effect of cyclic loading on fracture strength and microleakage of a quartz fiber dowel with different adhesive, cement and resin core material combinations.循环加载对采用不同粘结剂、水门汀和树脂核材料组合的石英纤维桩的断裂强度和微渗漏的影响。
Minerva Stomatol. 2010 Jul-Aug;59(7-8):407-14.
6
Effect of reinforcement with resin composite on fracture strength of structurally compromised roots.树脂复合材料增强对结构受损根折裂强度的影响。
Dent Mater J. 2009 Sep;28(5):602-9. doi: 10.4012/dmj.28.602.
7
Fracture resistance and failure pattern of teeth submitted to internal bleaching with 37% carbamide peroxide, with application of different restorative procedures.采用37%过氧化脲进行内漂白并应用不同修复程序的牙齿的抗折性和失败模式
J Appl Oral Sci. 2006 Aug;14(4):247-52. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572006000400007.
8
Stress distribution in roots restored with different types of post systems with composite resin.不同类型桩核系统复合树脂修复后牙根内的应力分布
Dent Mater J. 2008 Jul;27(4):605-11. doi: 10.4012/dmj.27.605.
9
Fracture resistance of anterior teeth restored with a novel nonmetallic post.采用新型非金属桩修复的前牙抗折性
J Can Dent Assoc. 2008 Jun;74(5):441.
10
In search of necessary mouthguard thickness. Part 1: From the viewpoint of shock absorption ability.
Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi. 2008 Apr;52(2):211-9. doi: 10.2186/jjps.52.211.

不同桩核系统对冲击应力的影响:一项初步研究。

Influence of different post-core systems on impact stress: a pilot study.

作者信息

Kondoh Yoshihiro, Takeda Tomotaka, Ozawa Takamitsu, Narimatsu Keishiro, Konno Michiyo, Fujii Toshiki, Sekiguchi Chieko, Nakajima Kazunori, Ishigami Keiichi, Shomura Masahito

机构信息

Department of General Dentistry, Tokyo Dental College Chiba Hospital.

Department of Sports Dentistry, Tokyo Dental College.

出版信息

Open Dent J. 2013 Nov 29;7:162-8. doi: 10.2174/1874210601307010162. eCollection 2013.

DOI:10.2174/1874210601307010162
PMID:24358064
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3866705/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

This pilot study compared impact strain at the core and root surfaces between two different post-core systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The form of a bovine mandibular front tooth was modified to resemble that of a human maxillary incisor as a test specimen. A cast post and core (Metal PC) and composite resin and glass fiber-reinforced epoxy resin post (Fiber-Resin PC) system were tested. Four gauges were affixed to the buccal and lingual surfaces of the core and root. The specimens were then embedded in a metal mold using dental stone. A pendulum-type device with a pyramid-shaped metal impact object with a titanium alloy head was used to provide 2 different shock forces. Maximum distortion was measured and analyzed.

RESULTS

Distortion at the core at each measurement point and total amount of distortion with Fiber-Resin PC was significantly greater (p<0.05) than that with Metal PC against both impact forces. On the other hand, distortion at the root at the buccal measurement point with Fiber-Resin PC was significantly less than that with Metal PC against both impact forces. Total distortion was significantly less with Fiber-Resin PC than that with Metal PC against the greater impact shock. Acceleration with Fiber-Resin PC was significantly less than that with Metal PC against both impact forces.

CONCLUSION

Fiber-Resin PC has the potential to protect remaining root against traumatic force. This suggests that a Fiber-Resin PC is more suitable for non-vital teeth against not only occlusal but also traumatic impact force.

摘要

未标注

本前瞻性研究比较了两种不同桩核系统在核部和牙根表面的冲击应变。

材料与方法

将牛下颌前牙的外形修改为类似人类上颌切牙作为测试样本。测试了铸造桩核(金属桩核)和复合树脂与玻璃纤维增强环氧树脂桩(纤维树脂桩核)系统。在核部和牙根的颊侧和舌侧表面粘贴四个应变片。然后使用牙科石膏将样本嵌入金属模具中。使用带有钛合金头部的金字塔形金属冲击物的摆锤式装置提供两种不同的冲击力。测量并分析最大变形。

结果

在两种冲击力作用下,纤维树脂桩核在每个测量点处核部的变形以及总变形量均显著大于金属桩核(p<0.05)。另一方面,在两种冲击力作用下,纤维树脂桩核在颊侧测量点处牙根的变形显著小于金属桩核。在较大冲击力作用下,纤维树脂桩核的总变形显著小于金属桩核。在两种冲击力作用下,纤维树脂桩核的加速度显著小于金属桩核。

结论

纤维树脂桩核有保护剩余牙根免受外力损伤的潜力。这表明纤维树脂桩核不仅更适合于无活力牙承受咬合冲击力,也适合承受外力冲击力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1271/3866705/9ad979146bcc/TODENTJ-7-162_F6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1271/3866705/fa599871f0ed/TODENTJ-7-162_F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1271/3866705/7d0c88053d20/TODENTJ-7-162_F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1271/3866705/cca68be2e5d3/TODENTJ-7-162_F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1271/3866705/5d956c658754/TODENTJ-7-162_F4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1271/3866705/2e9aabfab26b/TODENTJ-7-162_F5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1271/3866705/9ad979146bcc/TODENTJ-7-162_F6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1271/3866705/fa599871f0ed/TODENTJ-7-162_F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1271/3866705/7d0c88053d20/TODENTJ-7-162_F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1271/3866705/cca68be2e5d3/TODENTJ-7-162_F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1271/3866705/5d956c658754/TODENTJ-7-162_F4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1271/3866705/2e9aabfab26b/TODENTJ-7-162_F5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1271/3866705/9ad979146bcc/TODENTJ-7-162_F6.jpg