Department of Public Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2011 Aug;46(4):1243-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01258.x. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
To examine the effects of state legislation mandating direct access to obstetricians and gynecologists (OB/GYNs) on maternal health behaviors and infant health outcomes.
1992-2002 Natality Detail File; 1994-2002 Pregnancy Assessment and Monitoring Survey (PRAMS).
Using variation in state policy over time, we use individual-level data from two sources to consider the effects of direct access legislation on prenatal care utilization, maternal health behaviors during pregnancy, and infant health outcomes.
Our results suggest that there is little evidence that direct access laws are effective at improving prenatal care access or conferring benefits to mothers and infants. These results are consistent across two data sets, a variety of specifications, and specific subgroups of women who are most likely to be affected by direct access legislation.
We conclude that direct access to OB/GYNs is not related to improvements in maternal health behaviors or infant health outcomes. If policy makers are interested in reforms that improve maternal and infant health, we recommend a focus on alternative policies.
考察州立法规定直接获得妇产科医生(OB/GYN)服务对产妇健康行为和婴儿健康结果的影响。
1992-2002 年出生率详细档案;1994-2002 年妊娠评估和监测调查(PRAMS)。
利用随时间变化的州政策差异,我们使用两个来源的个体层面数据来考虑直接获得立法对产前保健利用、妊娠期间产妇健康行为以及婴儿健康结果的影响。
我们的结果表明,几乎没有证据表明直接获得法律能够有效改善产前保健的可及性或为母亲和婴儿带来益处。这些结果在两个数据集、各种规范以及最有可能受到直接获得立法影响的特定妇女亚组中都是一致的。
我们的结论是,直接获得妇产科医生服务与改善产妇健康行为或婴儿健康结果无关。如果政策制定者有兴趣进行改善母婴健康的改革,我们建议关注替代政策。