Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, United Kingdom.
Phys Ther. 2011 May;91(5):820-4. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110060. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
In this perspective article, a number of conclusions and recommendations are offered based on the articles in this special issue of PTJ. In this special issue, a new approach to physical therapy, termed "psychologically informed practice," is offered as a "middle way" between narrowly focused standard physical therapist practice based on biomedical principles and the more cognitive-behavioral approaches developed originally for the treatment of mental illness. This new approach uses the "flags" framework, with psychologically informed practice requiring routine and specific consideration of "yellow flags" and "blue flags" (depending on clinical setting) for determining risk of poor outcome and identifying the potential for treatment modification-but with cognizance of the overall environment or context in which the clinician must operate. This context includes professional culture, health care policy, and insurance reimbursement (potential "black flags"). The primary goal of this approach is to prevent the development of unnecessary pain-associated activity limitations. The approach is based on the identification of normal psychological processes that affect the perception of pain and the response to it as an expected and normal part of the musculoskeletal pain experience and that are potentially modifiable. The potential for linking risk identification with targeted treatment has been discussed, this article focuses on the potential implications for training and implementation, drawing on experience in developing training programs in which the trainees have welcomed this new approach, viewing it as a helpful extension of their basic professional training. Indeed, this new approach can be viewed as evolutionary rather than revolutionary, in that it builds upon the established professional expertise of physical therapists, but incorporates systematic attention to the psychosocial factors that are associated with outcome of treatment.
在这篇观点文章中,基于 PTJ 特刊中的文章,提出了一些结论和建议。在本期特刊中,提出了一种新的物理治疗方法,称为“心理知情实践”,作为一种“中庸之道”,介于基于生物医学原理的狭义标准物理治疗实践和最初为治疗精神疾病开发的更认知行为方法之间。这种新方法使用“标志”框架,心理知情实践需要常规和具体考虑“黄标”和“蓝标”(取决于临床环境),以确定不良结果的风险并确定治疗修改的潜力-但要注意临床医生必须运作的整体环境或背景。这个背景包括专业文化、医疗政策和保险报销(潜在的“黑标”)。这种方法的主要目标是防止不必要的疼痛相关活动受限的发展。该方法基于对正常心理过程的识别,这些过程会影响对疼痛的感知以及对其作为肌肉骨骼疼痛体验的正常和正常部分的反应,并且这些过程可能是可改变的。已经讨论了将风险识别与靶向治疗联系起来的潜力,本文重点讨论了培训和实施的潜在影响,借鉴了开发培训计划的经验,受训人员对这种新方法表示欢迎,将其视为对他们基本专业培训的有益扩展。事实上,这种新方法可以被视为进化而不是革命性的,因为它建立在物理治疗师既定的专业知识基础上,但纳入了对与治疗结果相关的社会心理因素的系统关注。