• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群体间的人脸识别偏差受群体地位的调节。

Inter-Group Face Recognition Bias Was Modulated by the Group Status.

作者信息

Hu Bingjie, Yan Linlin, Zheng Chengyan, Tang Yuhao, Lin Qiuye, Xia Wenling, Wang Zhe

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 May 27;13:837836. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.837836. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.837836
PMID:35693499
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9184734/
Abstract

Previous studies have shown that social categorization can induce an own-group face recognition bias. However, similar and better other-group face recognition emerged recently. In this research, we aimed to examine whether competitive cues and group status accompanied by social categorization can modulate the inter-group face recognition bias. Moreover, we investigated how the group identification of individuals with different statuses affected the inter-group face recognition bias. The results indicated that an own-group face recognition bias emerged for targets with in-group labels compared to out-group labels. Moreover, when the group labels signaled competitive cues, the own-group face recognition bias was reversed. Furthermore, low-status and similar-status individuals exhibited out-group face recognition bias, but high-status individuals did not. In addition, the higher the in-group identification scores of participants from the low-status group, the stronger the out-group face recognition bias. These results suggested that competitive cues would reverse the own-group face recognition bias and the group status would play a modulating role in face recognition bias.

摘要

先前的研究表明,社会分类会引发内群体面孔识别偏差。然而,近期出现了相似且更优的外群体面孔识别情况。在本研究中,我们旨在探究伴随社会分类的竞争线索和群体地位是否能够调节群体间面孔识别偏差。此外,我们研究了不同地位个体的群体认同如何影响群体间面孔识别偏差。结果表明,与带有外群体标签的目标相比,带有内群体标签的目标出现了内群体面孔识别偏差。此外,当群体标签传达竞争线索时,内群体面孔识别偏差会发生逆转。此外,低地位个体和地位相似的个体表现出外群体面孔识别偏差,但高地位个体则没有。另外,低地位群体参与者的内群体认同得分越高,外群体面孔识别偏差就越强。这些结果表明,竞争线索会逆转内群体面孔识别偏差,且群体地位会在面孔识别偏差中发挥调节作用。

相似文献

1
Inter-Group Face Recognition Bias Was Modulated by the Group Status.群体间的人脸识别偏差受群体地位的调节。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 27;13:837836. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.837836. eCollection 2022.
2
Own-Group Face Recognition Bias: The Effects of Location and Reputation.内群体面部识别偏差:位置与声誉的影响
Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 10;8:1734. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01734. eCollection 2017.
3
Social categorization modulates own-age bias in face recognition and ERP correlates of face processing.社会分类调节人脸识别中的年龄偏向以及面部处理的事件相关电位关联。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Apr;141:107417. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107417. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
4
The cross-category effect: mere social categorization is sufficient to elicit an own-group bias in face recognition.跨类别效应:仅仅是社会分类就足以在人脸识别中引发内群体偏见。
Psychol Sci. 2007 Aug;18(8):706-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01964.x.
5
Social categorization and individuation in the own-age bias.年龄偏见中的社会分类与个体化。
Br J Psychol. 2019 Nov;110(4):635-651. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12376. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
6
Effects of encoding tasks on the own-age face recognition bias.编码任务对自身年龄面孔识别偏差的影响。
J Gen Psychol. 2012 Apr-Jun;139(2):55-67. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2012.657266.
7
What drives social in-group biases in face recognition memory? ERP evidence from the own-gender bias.是什么驱动了人脸识别记忆中的社会内群体偏见?来自性别内偏见的 ERP 证据。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 May;9(5):580-90. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst024. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
8
An own-age bias in mixed- and pure-list presentations: No evidence for the social-cognitive account.混合列表呈现和纯列表呈现中的同年龄偏见:没有证据支持社会认知理论。
Br J Psychol. 2020 Nov;111(4):702-722. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12435. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
9
Learning task affects ERP-correlates of the own-race bias, but not recognition memory performance.学习任务影响自身种族偏见的 ERP 相关因素,但不影响识别记忆表现。
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jun;48(7):2027-40. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.03.024. Epub 2010 Apr 1.
10
The combined influence of the own-age, -gender, and -ethnicity biases on face recognition.自身年龄、性别和种族偏见对人脸识别的综合影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Mar;194:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.01.009. Epub 2019 Jan 25.

本文引用的文献

1
How does social competition affect true and false recognition?社会竞争如何影响真假识别?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Feb;28(1):292-303. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01807-7. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
2
How robust is the own-group face recognition bias? Evidence from first- and second-generation East Asian Canadians.东亚第一代和第二代加拿大人群体的自身族群面孔识别偏见有多强?
PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233758. eCollection 2020.
3
Are You In or Are You Out? The Importance of Group Saliency in Own-Group Biases in Face Recognition.
你在还是不在?群体突显在面孔识别中的内群体偏见中的重要性。
Perception. 2020 Jun;49(6):672-687. doi: 10.1177/0301006620918100. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
4
Effects of dominance and prestige based social status on competition for attentional resources.基于支配地位和威望的社会地位对竞争注意力资源的影响。
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 21;9(1):2473. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39223-0.
5
Own-Group Face Recognition Bias: The Effects of Location and Reputation.内群体面部识别偏差:位置与声誉的影响
Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 10;8:1734. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01734. eCollection 2017.
6
Social Groups Prioritize Selective Attention to Faces: How Social Identity Shapes Distractor Interference.社会群体优先对面孔进行选择性注意:社会身份如何塑造干扰项干扰。
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 24;11(8):e0161426. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161426. eCollection 2016.
7
Proximity under Threat: The Role of Physical Distance in Intergroup Relations.受到威胁的亲近感:身体距离在群体间关系中的作用。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 28;11(7):e0159792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159792. eCollection 2016.
8
Eyes keep watch over you! Competition enhances joint attention in females.眼睛在注视着你!竞争增强了雌性的共同注意力。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Sep;160:170-7. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.07.013. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
9
Temporal dynamics underlying the modulation of social status on social attention.社会地位调节社会注意力的时间动态。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 25;9(3):e93139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093139. eCollection 2014.
10
Differences in anticipated interaction drive own group biases in face memory.预期互动中的差异会导致面部记忆中的内群体偏见。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 5;9(3):e90668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090668. eCollection 2014.