Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Apr;57(4):387-404. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.01.013.
This clinical policy from the American College of Emergency Physicians is an update of the 2004 clinical policy on the critical issues in the evaluation of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with acute blunt abdominal trauma. A writing subcommittee reviewed the literature as part of the process to develop evidence-based recommendations to address 4 key critical questions: (1) In a hemodynamically unstable patient with blunt abdominal trauma, is ultrasound the diagnostic modality of choice? (2) Does oral contrast improve the diagnostic performance of computed tomography (CT) in blunt abdominal trauma? (3) In a clinically stable patient with isolated blunt abdominal trauma, is it safe to discharge the patient after a negative abdominal CT scan result? (4) In patients with isolated blunt abdominal trauma, are there clinical predictors that allow the clinician to identify patients at low risk for adverse events who do not need an abdominal CT? Evidence was graded and recommendations were based on the available data in the medical literature related to the specific clinical question.
美国急诊医师学院的这份临床政策是对 2004 年成人急诊急性钝性腹部创伤评估关键问题临床政策的更新。一个写作小组委员会审查了文献,作为制定循证建议以解决 4 个关键关键问题的过程的一部分:(1) 在血流动力学不稳定的钝性腹部创伤患者中,超声是首选的诊断方式吗?(2) 口服对比剂是否能提高 CT 在钝性腹部创伤中的诊断性能?(3) 在临床稳定的孤立性钝性腹部创伤患者中,阴性腹部 CT 扫描结果后是否可以安全出院?(4) 在孤立性钝性腹部创伤患者中,是否有临床预测因素可以让临床医生识别出低风险不良事件的患者,这些患者不需要进行腹部 CT 检查?证据被分级,建议是基于与特定临床问题相关的医学文献中的现有数据。