Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado, Leprino Office Building, 12401 E. 17th Avenue, B215, Denver, CO 80045, United States.
Resuscitation. 2011 Jun;82(6):674-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.02.002. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
To understand the association between neighborhood and individual characteristics in determining whether or not bystanders perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).
Between October 1, 2005 to November 30, 2008, 1108 OHCA cases from Fulton County (Atlanta), GA, were eligible for bystander CPR. We conducted multi-level non-linear regression analysis and derived Empirical Bayes estimates for bystander CPR by census tract.
279 (25%) cardiac arrest victims received bystander CPR. Provision of bystander CPR was significantly more common in witnessed events (odds ratio [OR] 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21-2.22, p < 0.001) and those that occurred in public locations (OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.16-2.40, p < 0.001). Other individual-level characteristics were not significantly associated with bystander CPR. Cardiac arrests in the census tracts that rank in the highest income quintile, as compared to the lowest income quintile were much more likely (OR 4.98; 95% CI 1.65-15.04) to receive bystander CPR.
Cardiac arrest victims in the highest income census tracts were much more likely to receive bystander CPR than in the lowest income census tracts, even after controlling for individual and arrest characteristics. Low-income neighborhoods may be particularly appropriate targets for community-based CPR training and awareness efforts.
了解邻里和个体特征在决定旁观者是否对院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者实施心肺复苏(CPR)中的关联。
2005 年 10 月 1 日至 2008 年 11 月 30 日,佐治亚州富尔顿县(亚特兰大)的 1108 例 OHCA 患者符合旁观者 CPR 条件。我们进行了多层次非线性回归分析,并根据人口普查区得出了旁观者 CPR 的经验贝叶斯估计。
279 例(25%)心脏骤停患者接受了旁观者 CPR。目击者事件(优势比[OR]1.64;95%置信区间[CI]1.21-2.22,p<0.001)和发生在公共场所的事件(OR 1.67;95%CI 1.16-2.40,p<0.001)中旁观者 CPR 的提供更为常见。其他个体特征与旁观者 CPR 无显著相关性。与收入最低的五分位数相比,收入最高的五分位数中的心脏骤停患者更有可能接受旁观者 CPR(OR 4.98;95%CI 1.65-15.04)。
即使在控制了个体和逮捕特征后,收入最高的人口普查区的心脏骤停患者比收入最低的人口普查区更有可能接受旁观者 CPR。低收入社区可能是基于社区的 CPR 培训和意识提升工作的特别合适的目标人群。