• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院环境消毒的另一种方法。

An alternative approach for the decontamination of hospital settings.

机构信息

Department of Medicine Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, via S. Allende 1, 84081 Baronissi, SA, Italy.

Department of Medicine Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, via S. Allende 1, 84081 Baronissi, SA, Italy.

出版信息

J Infect Public Health. 2020 Dec;13(12):2038-2044. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.09.020. Epub 2020 Oct 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.jiph.2020.09.020
PMID:33289645
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7577675/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The increasing emergence and spread of multiresistant microorganisms in hospital wards is a serious concern. Traditional protocols are often not sufficient to protect patients susceptible to serious and life-threatening infections, therefore new strategies for decontaminating hospital environments are crucial to reducing microbial transmission and the spread the nosocomial infections. The adoption of modern technologies is indicated to supplement traditional methods and to improve desired levels of surface disinfection.

AIM

This work aims to report the development, implementation, and validation of cleansing and sanitizing procedure for critical clinical settings through the innovative use of disposable cloths pre-impregnated with solutions containing different active formulations and biocidal agents, relating to the areas to be treated (low, moderate, high-risk).

METHODS

The implementation and validation of the sanitizing system were conducted in different wards of two healthcare structures. The protocol for the study involved a structured selection of representative surfaces, such as the floor, bathroom, desk, and beds. Microbiological analyses were performed according to ISO 4833-1:2013.

FINDINGS

The efficiency of the proposed system was measured through the estimation of total microbial count values on the different surfaces before and after the sanitization operations by traditional methods and by the system described here. The results demonstrated a significant reduction in the microbial count that always fell below the threshold value. For the analyzed surfaces such as shower tray, bathroom floor, toilet edge, the traditional system had an effectiveness of less than 10%, whereas pre-impregnated cloths succeed to eliminate about 90% of the bacteria present. As an example, on the floor we observed a microbial count reduction from >42 to 10CFU/11cm with the new method (76% of colonies were destroyed), while with the traditional one we have a reduction from >42 to 28CFU/11cm (33% of microbial colonies). Moreover, the advantages of using this sanitization system are not limited to disinfecting surfaces and limiting cross-contamination but involve all activities related to the cleaning and disinfection operations, including the training and education of the operators and traceability of the operations.

CONCLUSIONS

The innovative disinfection and cleaning protocol used in the present study proved to be a highly valuable alternative to the traditional cleaning procedures in healthcare settings for the sanitizing process of all kinds of surfaces. All tools were specifically designed to improve disinfection efficiency and to reduce the problems associated with traditional methods, such as preventing cross-contamination events, limiting the physical efforts of operators, and avoiding incorrect practices. Our findings add support to the knowledge that an effective sanitization procedure is critical in minimizing microorganisms' transmission and cross-contamination.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb47/7577675/3fd719a1c662/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb47/7577675/3fd719a1c662/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb47/7577675/3fd719a1c662/gr1_lrg.jpg
摘要

背景

医院病房中多耐药微生物的不断出现和传播是一个严重的问题。传统方案通常不足以保护易受严重和危及生命的感染的患者,因此,新的医院环境去污策略对于减少微生物传播和医院感染的传播至关重要。采用现代技术是为了补充传统方法,并提高表面消毒的理想水平。

目的

本研究旨在报告通过使用预浸渍有不同活性配方和杀生物剂的一次性布,为关键临床环境开发、实施和验证清洁和消毒程序,涉及待处理区域(低、中、高风险)。

方法

在两个医疗机构的不同病房中实施和验证了消毒系统。该研究的方案包括对地板、浴室、办公桌和病床等代表性表面进行结构化选择。根据 ISO 4833-1:2013 进行微生物分析。

结果

通过传统方法和本文所述系统对不同表面消毒前后的总微生物计数值进行估计,测量了所提出系统的效率。结果表明,微生物计数显著降低,始终低于阈值。对于分析的表面,如淋浴盘、浴室地板、马桶边缘,传统系统的有效性小于 10%,而预浸渍布成功消除了约 90%的存在细菌。例如,在地板上,我们观察到新方法下的微生物计数从>42 减少到 10CFU/11cm(76%的菌落被破坏),而传统方法下的微生物计数从>42 减少到 28CFU/11cm(33%的菌落)。此外,使用这种消毒系统的优点不仅限于消毒表面和限制交叉污染,还涉及与清洁和消毒操作相关的所有活动,包括操作人员的培训和教育以及操作的可追溯性。

结论

本研究中使用的创新消毒和清洁方案被证明是医疗环境中传统清洁程序的一种非常有价值的替代方法,适用于各种表面的消毒过程。所有工具均专门设计用于提高消毒效率,并解决传统方法相关的问题,例如防止交叉污染事件、减少操作人员的体力消耗以及避免不当操作。我们的研究结果支持以下观点,即有效的消毒程序对于最大限度地减少微生物传播和交叉污染至关重要。

相似文献

1
An alternative approach for the decontamination of hospital settings.医院环境消毒的另一种方法。
J Infect Public Health. 2020 Dec;13(12):2038-2044. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.09.020. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
2
Development and Improvement of an Effective Method for Air and Surfaces Disinfection with Ozone Gas as a Decontaminating Agent.开发和改进一种利用臭氧气体作为消毒剂对空气和表面进行有效消毒的方法。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Oct 30;56(11):578. doi: 10.3390/medicina56110578.
3
Self-Disinfecting Copper Beds Sustain Terminal Cleaning and Disinfection Effects throughout Patient Care.自消毒铜床在整个患者护理过程中保持终末清洁和消毒效果。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019 Dec 13;86(1). doi: 10.1128/AEM.01886-19.
4
Effectiveness of Surface Cleaning and Disinfection in a Brazilian Healthcare Facility.巴西一家医疗机构中表面清洁与消毒的效果
Open Nurs J. 2018 Mar 28;12:36-44. doi: 10.2174/1874434601812010036. eCollection 2018.
5
Assessing the efficacy of different microfibre cloths at removing surface micro-organisms associated with healthcare-associated infections.评估不同微纤维布去除与医源性感染相关的表面微生物的效果。
J Hosp Infect. 2011 Jul;78(3):182-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.02.015. Epub 2011 Apr 17.
6
The influence of microclimate conditions on ozone disinfection efficacy in working places.微气候条件对工作场所臭氧消毒效果的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Dec;28(45):64687-64692. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15457-2. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
7
Efficacy of pulsed-xenon ultraviolet light for disinfection of high-touch surfaces in an Ecuadorian hospital.脉冲氙紫外线光对厄瓜多尔一家医院高接触表面消毒的效果。
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Jul 3;19(1):575. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4200-3.
8
No-Touch Automated Disinfection System for Decontamination of Surfaces in Hospitals.无接触式自动化消毒系统,用于医院表面消毒。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 16;17(14):5131. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145131.
9
The use of a UV-C disinfection robot in the routine cleaning process: a field study in an Academic hospital.在常规清洁过程中使用 UV-C 消毒机器人:学术医院的现场研究。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2021 May 29;10(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13756-021-00945-4.
10
Hard surface biocontrol in hospitals using microbial-based cleaning products.在医院中使用基于微生物的清洁产品进行硬表面生物控制。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 26;9(9):e108598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108598. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of an experimental gaseous ozone-based sterilization method for clear aligners.一种基于实验性气态臭氧的透明保持器消毒方法的疗效。
Angle Orthod. 2024 Mar 1;94(2):194-199. doi: 10.2319/061623-421.1.
2
Disinfection of the air and surfaces in the dental clinic using hydroxyl radical (OH-) based technology: A systematic review.使用基于羟基自由基(OH-)技术对牙科诊所空气和表面进行消毒:一项系统综述。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2023 Jun 1;15(6):e494-e504. doi: 10.4317/jced.60461. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Monitoring Growth and Removal of Biofilms on Cellulose-Based Fabrics.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of disinfectant-impregnated wipes used for surface disinfection in hospitals: a review.消毒剂浸渍湿巾用于医院表面消毒的效果:综述。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019 Aug 19;8:139. doi: 10.1186/s13756-019-0595-2. eCollection 2019.
2
Surface contamination in the operating room: use of adenosine triphosphate monitoring.手术室表面污染:使用三磷酸腺苷监测。
J Anesth. 2019 Feb;33(1):85-89. doi: 10.1007/s00540-018-2590-9. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
3
A new strategy to control the proliferation of microorganisms in solid hospital waste and the diffusion of nosocomial infections.
监测纤维素基织物上生物膜的生长与去除
Microorganisms. 2023 Mar 30;11(4):892. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11040892.
4
Deployment of a Novel Organic Acid Compound Disinfectant against Common Foodborne Pathogens.一种新型有机酸化合物消毒剂对常见食源性病原体的应用
Toxics. 2022 Dec 9;10(12):768. doi: 10.3390/toxics10120768.
5
Potent Activity of a High Concentration of Chemical Ozone against Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria.高浓度化学臭氧对耐药菌的强效活性。
Molecules. 2022 Jun 22;27(13):3998. doi: 10.3390/molecules27133998.
6
Inanimate Surfaces as a Source of Hospital Infections Caused by Fungi, Bacteria and Viruses with Particular Emphasis on SARS-CoV-2.无生命表面作为真菌、细菌和病毒引起医院感染的来源,特别强调 SARS-CoV-2。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 1;19(13):8121. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19138121.
7
Disinfecting Action of Gaseous Ozone on OXA-48-Producing Biofilm In Vitro.气态臭氧对产 OXA-48 生物膜的体外消毒作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 19;19(10):6177. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19106177.
8
Investigation of biocidal efficacy of commercial disinfectants used in public, private and workplaces during the pandemic event of SARS-CoV-2.SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间公共、私人和工作场所使用的商业消毒剂的杀菌功效研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 31;12(1):5468. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09575-1.
9
The influence of microclimate conditions on ozone disinfection efficacy in working places.微气候条件对工作场所臭氧消毒效果的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Dec;28(45):64687-64692. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15457-2. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
10
Development and Improvement of an Effective Method for Air and Surfaces Disinfection with Ozone Gas as a Decontaminating Agent.开发和改进一种利用臭氧气体作为消毒剂对空气和表面进行有效消毒的方法。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Oct 30;56(11):578. doi: 10.3390/medicina56110578.
一种控制医院固体废弃物中微生物增殖及医院感染传播的新策略。
Infez Med. 2018 Sep 1;26(3):210-215.
4
Guidance for the decontamination of intracavity medical devices: the report of a working group of the Healthcare Infection Society.腔镜医疗器械清洗消毒灭菌技术操作规范专家共识(2023 年版)
J Hosp Infect. 2019 Jan;101(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
5
Microorganisms in Confined Habitats: Microbial Monitoring and Control of Intensive Care Units, Operating Rooms, Cleanrooms and the International Space Station.密闭环境中的微生物:重症监护病房、手术室、洁净室及国际空间站的微生物监测与控制
Front Microbiol. 2016 Oct 13;7:1573. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01573. eCollection 2016.
6
Bactericidal and Fungicidal Activity in the Gas Phase of Sodium Dichloroisocyanurate (NaDCC).二氯异氰尿酸钠(NaDCC)气相中的杀菌和杀真菌活性。
Curr Microbiol. 2016 Aug;73(2):287-91. doi: 10.1007/s00284-016-1040-x. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
7
Modern technologies for improving cleaning and disinfection of environmental surfaces in hospitals.改善医院环境表面清洁与消毒的现代技术。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2016 Apr 11;5:10. doi: 10.1186/s13756-016-0111-x. eCollection 2016.
8
Bacterial contamination of inanimate surfaces and equipment in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房中无生命表面和设备的细菌污染。
J Intensive Care. 2015 Dec 10;3:54. doi: 10.1186/s40560-015-0120-5. eCollection 2015.
9
Improving operating room cleaning results with microfiber and steam technology.利用微纤维和蒸汽技术提高手术室清洁效果。
Am J Infect Control. 2016 Jan 1;44(1):120-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.08.016. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
10
Study of the antibacterial activity in the gas phase of a chemical formulation for household waste management.用于家庭垃圾管理的化学制剂气相抗菌活性研究。
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2015 Mar;60(3):223-8. doi: 10.1111/lam.12360. Epub 2014 Dec 21.