Suppr超能文献

声带质量对于描述发声中的基频(F0)并不是一个有用的量。

Vocal fold mass is not a useful quantity for describing F0 in vocalization.

机构信息

National Center for Voice and Speech, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011 Apr;54(2):520-2. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0284).

Abstract

PURPOSE

Confusion exists about the effect of mass and size of the vocal folds on fundamental frequency (F0) of phonation. In particular, greater vocal fold thickness is often assumed to be associated with lower F0. The purpose here is to show that such a relationship does not exist and that F0 should be conceptualized with quantities other than mass (i.e., length and tissue stress).

METHOD

Arguments are made on the basis of fundamental laws of mechanics (point-mass vs. distributed mass).

CONCLUSION

In speech science, phonetics, and animal vocalization disciplines, instruction should shift away from point-mass descriptions of vocal fold tissue and toward an understanding of mode frequencies in an elastic continuum.

摘要

目的

关于声带的质量和大小对基频(F0)的影响,存在混淆。特别是,通常认为更大的声带厚度与更低的 F0 相关。这里的目的是表明这种关系并不存在,并且 F0 应该用质量以外的量来概念化(即长度和组织应力)。

方法

基于力学的基本定律(质点与分布质量)进行论证。

结论

在语音科学、语音学和动物发声学科中,应该从对声带组织的质点描述转向对弹性连续体中模态频率的理解。

相似文献

2
Vocal fold dynamics for frequency change.频率变化时的声带动态。
J Voice. 2014 Jul;28(4):395-405. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.12.005. Epub 2014 Apr 13.

引用本文的文献

2
[Clinical diagnosis and treatment of pitch-related disorders].[音高相关障碍的临床诊断与治疗]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025 Jan;39(1):1-6. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2025.01.001.

本文引用的文献

1
Four laminagraphic studies of vocal fold thickness.四项声带厚度的断层摄影研究。
Folia Phoniatr (Basel). 1969;21(3):179-98. doi: 10.1159/000263250.
2
Normal modes in vocal cord tissues.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1975 Mar;57(3):736-49. doi: 10.1121/1.380498.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验