• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较打字和手写对学校拼写成绩的影响。

Comparing the effects of typing and handwriting on spelling performance in school.

作者信息

Broc Lucie, Goudeau Sébastien, Colliot Tiphaine

机构信息

Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l'Apprentissage, CNRS, MSHS - Bâtiment A5, Université de Poitiers, 5 rue T. Lefebvre, TSA 21103, Poitiers Cedex 9, 86073, France.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 May 23;15(1):17985. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03369-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-03369-x
PMID:40410404
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12102145/
Abstract

The widespread integration of digital tools into students' daily lives has raised important questions about their impact on academic performance, particularly in relation to writing and spelling mastery. Three studies investigate how writing modalities-pen-and-paper versus keyboard-and-computer-affect spelling performance in school tasks. A total of 305 students from Grades 4 to 7 participated, completing a standardized copying task and narrative task in both writing conditions. Results showed that, in the copying task, younger students (Grades 4-5) produced higher-quality handwritten texts with greater spelling accuracy, longer text length, and fewer errors per word. However, spelling accuracy in the narrative task did not significantly differ across grades or between writing modalities. Interestingly, no significant differences were found in the types of spelling errors between the two conditions for either task, although an increase in morphological errors was observed in the narrative task from Grades 4-7, possibly reflecting the growing linguistic complexity of French. Overall, task type and grade level strongly influence written production, with the pen-and-paper modality providing an early advantage in spelling during copying tasks, but no consistent impact in narrative tasks. These findings highlight the nuanced role that writing medium and task complexity play in students' academic development.

摘要

数字工具在学生日常生活中的广泛应用引发了关于其对学业成绩影响的重要问题,尤其是在写作和拼写掌握方面。三项研究调查了写作方式——纸笔写作与键盘电脑写作——如何影响学校任务中的拼写表现。共有305名四至七年级的学生参与,在两种写作条件下完成了一项标准化抄写任务和叙述任务。结果显示,在抄写任务中,较年幼的学生(四年级至五年级)写出的手写文本质量更高,拼写准确性更高,文本长度更长,每个单词的错误更少。然而,叙述任务中的拼写准确性在各年级之间或写作方式之间没有显著差异。有趣的是,两项任务在两种条件下的拼写错误类型均未发现显著差异,尽管在四至七年级的叙述任务中观察到形态错误有所增加,这可能反映了法语语言复杂性的增加。总体而言,任务类型和年级水平对书面作业有强烈影响,纸笔写作方式在抄写任务中对拼写有早期优势,但在叙述任务中没有一致的影响。这些发现凸显了写作媒介和任务复杂性在学生学业发展中所起的细微作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8620/12102145/e42b2e54bcb7/41598_2025_3369_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8620/12102145/c53887110dc3/41598_2025_3369_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8620/12102145/735cdc962692/41598_2025_3369_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8620/12102145/c747de032d2a/41598_2025_3369_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8620/12102145/e42b2e54bcb7/41598_2025_3369_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8620/12102145/c53887110dc3/41598_2025_3369_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8620/12102145/735cdc962692/41598_2025_3369_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8620/12102145/c747de032d2a/41598_2025_3369_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8620/12102145/e42b2e54bcb7/41598_2025_3369_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing the effects of typing and handwriting on spelling performance in school.比较打字和手写对学校拼写成绩的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 23;15(1):17985. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03369-x.
2
Presentation matters: Surface text features and text quality in written narratives of Dutch high school students with and without dyslexia.表现很重要:荷兰读写困难和非读写困难高中生书面叙事中的表面文本特征和文本质量。
Dyslexia. 2024 Nov;30(4):e1786. doi: 10.1002/dys.1786.
3
Child-level factors affecting rate of learning to write in first grade.影响一年级学生写作学习速度的儿童因素。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2021 Jun;91(2):714-734. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12390. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
4
Computer Instruction in Handwriting, Spelling, and Composing for Students with Specific Learning Disabilities in Grades 4 to 9.针对4至9年级有特定学习障碍学生的手写、拼写和作文计算机教学
Comput Educ. 2015 Feb 1;81:154-168. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.005.
5
The Impact of Orthography on Text Production in Three Languages: Catalan, English, and Spanish.正字法对三种语言(加泰罗尼亚语、英语和西班牙语)文本生成的影响
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 3;11:878. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00878. eCollection 2020.
6
How Do Spelling, Handwriting Speed, and Handwriting Quality Develop During Primary School? Cross-Classified Growth Curve Analysis of Children's Writing Development.小学阶段拼写、书写速度和书写质量是如何发展的?儿童写作发展的交叉分类增长曲线分析。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 23;12:685681. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.685681. eCollection 2021.
7
Spelling Errors in French Elementary School Students: A Linguistic Analysis.法国小学生拼写错误:语言分析。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Sep 12;65(9):3456-3470. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-21-00507. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
8
The impact of word frequency on peripheral processes during handwriting: A matter of age.书写过程中单词频率对外周过程的影响:年龄因素
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Mar;71(3):695-703. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1275713. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
9
The influence of spelling ability on handwriting production: children with and without dyslexia.拼写能力对书写的影响:有阅读障碍和无阅读障碍的儿童
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Sep;40(5):1441-7. doi: 10.1037/a0035785. Epub 2014 Feb 17.
10
Copy Skills and Writing Abilities in Children With and Without Specific Learning Disabilities.有特定学习障碍和无特定学习障碍儿童的抄写技能与写作能力
J Learn Disabil. 2023 Sep-Oct;56(5):410-420. doi: 10.1177/00222194231157089. Epub 2023 Mar 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Spelling Errors in French Elementary School Students: A Linguistic Analysis.法国小学生拼写错误:语言分析。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Sep 12;65(9):3456-3470. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-21-00507. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
2
Typing expertise in a large student population.在大量学生群体中培养打字专长。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Aug 5;7(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00424-3.
3
Literacy Training of Kindergarten Children With Pencil, Keyboard or Tablet Stylus: The Influence of the Writing Tool on Reading and Writing Performance at the Letter and Word Level.
幼儿园儿童使用铅笔、键盘或手写笔进行识字训练:书写工具对字母和单词层面读写表现的影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 22;10:3054. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03054. eCollection 2019.
4
Disfluency effects on lexical selection.言语不流畅对词汇选择的影响。
Cognition. 2017 Jan;158:28-32. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.008. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
5
Effects of disfluency in writing.写作中不流畅的影响。
Br J Psychol. 2016 Nov;107(4):625-650. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12177. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
6
The pen is mightier than the keyboard: advantages of longhand over laptop note taking.笔比键盘更强大:手写笔记优于笔记本电脑笔记。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Jun;25(6):1159-68. doi: 10.1177/0956797614524581. Epub 2014 Apr 23.
7
Pushing typists back on the learning curve: revealing chunking in skilled typewriting.迫使打字员回到学习曲线上:揭示熟练打字中的组块现象。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Apr;40(2):592-612. doi: 10.1037/a0033809. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
8
Linguistic pattern analysis of misspellings of typically developing writers in grades 1-9.1-9 年级正常发育作家的拼写错误的语言模式分析。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Dec;55(6):1587-99. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/10-0335). Epub 2012 Apr 3.
9
From Scribbles to Scrabble: Preschool Children's Developing Knowledge of Written Language.从涂鸦到拼字游戏:学龄前儿童对书面语言的发展性认知
Read Writ. 2011 May;24(5):567-589. doi: 10.1007/s11145-009-9220-8.
10
Examining the central and peripheral processes of written word production through meta-analysis.通过元分析考察书面单词产生的中枢和外周过程。
Front Psychol. 2011 Oct 11;2:239. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00239. eCollection 2011.