Department of Psychology, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA, USA.
Mem Cognit. 2011 Aug;39(6):1055-67. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0089-9.
The present study examined the flexibility with which people can adopt different category schemes in the spatial domain. In a location memory task, participants viewed and estimated the locations of four kinds of objects that were spatially grouped by object identity. This identity-based arrangement was either congruent or incongruent with the perceptually based, geometric categories that have been reported in previous research. Four experiments examined the conditions under which these different category schemes are used to inform estimates of locations. The results showed that use of identity information depended on the number of objects to be remembered during a trial: When one or two objects were remembered at a time, only geometric categories affected estimates, but when four objects were to be remembered, both geometric categories and identity groupings affected estimates. As memory load increases, participants rely on additional sources to inform their estimates of location.
本研究考察了人们在空间域中采用不同类别方案的灵活性。在位置记忆任务中,参与者观看并估计了四种物体的位置,这些物体根据物体身份在空间上进行了分组。这种基于身份的安排与之前研究中报告的基于感知的几何类别一致或不一致。四个实验检验了这些不同类别方案在哪些条件下用于告知位置估计的情况。结果表明,身份信息的使用取决于在一次试验中要记住的物体数量:当一次记住一个或两个物体时,只有几何类别会影响估计,但当要记住四个物体时,几何类别和身份分组都会影响估计。随着记忆负荷的增加,参与者依赖于其他来源来告知他们对位置的估计。