Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;38(1):107-15. doi: 10.1002/uog.9016. Epub 2011 Apr 28.
To investigate whether standardization of the multiplanar view (SMV) when evaluating the uterus using three-dimensional ultrasonography (3D-US) improves intra- and interobserver reliability and agreement with regard to endometrial measurement.
Two-dimensional (2D) and 3D-US was used to measure endometrial thickness by two observers in 30 women undergoing assisted reproduction treatment. Endometrial volume was measured with Virtual Organ Computer-aided AnaLysis (VOCAL(™)) in the longitudinal (A) and coronal (C) planes using an unmodified multiplanar view (UMV) and a standardized multiplanar view (SMV). Measurement reliability was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and agreement was examined using Bland-Altman plots with limits of agreement (LoA). The ease of outlining the endometrial-myometrial interface was compared between the A- and C-planes using subjective assessment.
Endometrial volume measurements using the SMV and A-plane were more reliable (intra- and interobserver ICCs, 0.979 and 0.975, respectively) than were measurements of endometrial thickness using 2D-US (intra- and interobserver ICCs, 0.742 and 0.702, respectively) or 3D-US (intra- and interobserver ICCs, 0.890 and 0.784, respectively). The LoAs were narrower for SMV than for UMV. Reliability and agreement were not much different between the A- and C-planes. However the observers agreed that delineating the endometrial-myometrial interface using the A-plane was easier (first and second observer, 50.0 and 46.7%, respectively) or 'comparable' (50 and 53.3%, respectively), but never more difficult than using the C-plane.
Endometrial volume measurements are more reliable than endometrial thickness measurements and are best performed using SMV and the A-plane.
研究在使用三维超声(3D-US)评估子宫时,多平面视图(SMV)的标准化是否能提高子宫内膜测量的观察者内和观察者间的可靠性和一致性。
两名观察者对 30 名接受辅助生殖治疗的女性进行二维(2D)和 3D-US 测量子宫内膜厚度。使用未修改的多平面视图(UMV)和标准化的多平面视图(SMV),在矢状面(A)和冠状面(C)上通过虚拟器官计算机辅助分析(VOCAL(™))测量子宫内膜体积。使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估测量可靠性,使用 Bland-Altman 图和一致性界限(LoA)评估一致性。通过主观评估比较 A 平面和 C 平面勾勒子宫内膜-子宫肌层界面的难易程度。
使用 SMV 和 A 平面测量子宫内膜体积的观察者内和观察者间 ICC 分别为 0.979 和 0.975,均比使用 2D-US(ICC 分别为 0.742 和 0.702)或 3D-US(ICC 分别为 0.890 和 0.784)测量子宫内膜厚度更可靠。SMV 的 LoA 比 UMV 更窄。A 平面和 C 平面之间的可靠性和一致性差异不大。但是,观察者一致认为,使用 A 平面勾勒子宫内膜-子宫肌层界面更容易(第一和第二观察者分别为 50.0%和 46.7%)或“相当”(分别为 50%和 53.3%),但从未比使用 C 平面更困难。
子宫内膜体积测量比子宫内膜厚度测量更可靠,使用 SMV 和 A 平面测量效果最佳。