Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA, USA.
Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Apr;59(4):268-75. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.11.004. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
We determine whether, after a brief training program in procedural sedation, nurses can safely independently administer ketamine sedation in a resource-limited environment.
This is an observational case series of consecutive sedations performed in an emergency department in rural Uganda at approximately 5,000 feet above sea level. The data were collected prospectively in a quality assurance database. As part of a larger training program in emergency care at Karoli Lwanga Hospital in rural Uganda, nurses with no sedation experience were trained in procedural sedation with ketamine. All sedations were monitored by a nonphysician research assistant, who recorded ketamine dosing, duration of each procedure, adverse events, and nurse interventions for each adverse event. In accordance with standard definitions in the emergency medicine sedation literature, adverse events were defined a priori and classified as major (death, need for bag-valve-mask ventilation, or unanticipated admission to the hospital) or minor (hypoxia, vomiting, emergence reactions, hypersalivation). The primary statistical analysis was descriptive, with reporting of adverse event rates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using the nurse as the unit of analysis.
There were a total of 191 administrations by 6 nurses during the study period (December 2009 through March 2010). Overall, there was an 18% adverse event rate (95% CI 7% to 30%), which is similar to the rate reported in resource-rich countries. These events included hypoxia (22 cases; 12%), vomiting (9 cases; 5%), and emergence reaction (7 cases; 4%). All adverse events met our a priori defined criteria for minor events, with a 0% incidence of major events (1-sided 97.5% CI with the nurse as unit of analysis 0% to 46%). The procedural success rate was 99%. Sedation was practitioner rated as "excellent" in 91% of cases (95% CI 86% to 94%) and "good" in 9% (95% CI 6% to 14%). Patients reported they would want ketamine for a future procedure in 98% of cases (95% CI 95% to 100%).
In resource-limited settings, nurse-administered ketamine sedation appears to be safe and effective. A brief procedural sedation training program, coupled with a comprehensive training program in emergency care, can increase access to appropriate and safe sedation for patients in resource-limited settings.
我们旨在确定经过简短的程序性镇静培训后,护士能否在资源有限的环境中安全地独立进行氯胺酮镇静。
这是一项在乌干达农村海拔约 5000 英尺的急诊室进行的连续镇静观察性病例系列研究。数据是在一个质量保证数据库中前瞻性收集的。作为乌干达农村卡洛利·卢万加医院更大的急诊护理培训计划的一部分,没有镇静经验的护士接受了氯胺酮程序性镇静培训。所有镇静均由非医师研究助理进行监测,记录氯胺酮剂量、每个程序的持续时间、不良事件以及护士对每个不良事件的干预措施。根据急诊医学镇静文献中的标准定义,预先定义了不良事件,并将其分类为主要(死亡、需要进行球囊面罩通气或意外住院)或次要(缺氧、呕吐、苏醒反应、唾液分泌过多)。主要的统计分析是描述性的,使用护士作为分析单位,报告不良事件发生率及其 95%置信区间(CI)。
在研究期间(2009 年 12 月至 2010 年 3 月),共有 6 名护士进行了 191 次镇静。总体而言,不良事件发生率为 18%(95%CI 7%至 30%),与资源丰富国家报告的发生率相似。这些事件包括缺氧(22 例;12%)、呕吐(9 例;5%)和苏醒反应(7 例;4%)。所有不良事件均符合我们预先定义的次要事件标准,无重大事件(1 侧 97.5%CI,护士作为单位分析为 0%至 46%)。手术成功率为 99%。91%(95%CI 86%至 94%)的病例中镇静效果被评为“优秀”,9%(95%CI 6%至 14%)的病例中评为“良好”。患者报告称,他们希望在未来的手术中使用氯胺酮,占 98%(95%CI 95%至 100%)。
在资源有限的环境中,护士管理的氯胺酮镇静似乎是安全有效的。简短的程序性镇静培训计划,加上全面的急诊护理培训计划,可以增加资源有限环境中患者获得适当和安全镇静的机会。