Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Jul 1;172(7):678-685. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.0830.
It is not clear whether adherence to preprocedural fasting guidelines prevent pulmonary aspiration and associated adverse outcomes during emergency department (ED) sedation of children.
To examine the association between preprocedural fasting duration and the incidence of sedation-related adverse outcomes in a large sample of children.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a planned secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort study of children aged 0 to 18 years who received procedural sedation for a painful procedure in 6 Canadian pediatric EDs from July 2010 to February 2015. The primary risk factor was preprocedural fasting duration. Secondary risk factors were age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, preprocedural and sedation medications, and procedure type.
Four outcomes were examined: (1) pulmonary aspiration, (2) the occurrence of any adverse event, (3) serious adverse events, and (4) vomiting.
A total of 6183 children with a median age of 8.0 years (interquartile range, 4.0-12.0 years), of whom 6166 (99.7%) had healthy or mild systemic disease (American Society of Anesthesiologists levels I or II), were included in the analysis. Of these, 2974 (48.1%) and 310 (5.0%) children did not meet American Society of Anesthesiologists fasting guidelines for solids and liquids, respectively. There were no cases of pulmonary aspiration. There were 717 adverse events (11.6%; 95% CI, 10.8%-12.4%), of which 68 (1.1%; 95% CI, 0.9%-1.3%) were serious adverse events and 315 (5.1%; 95% CI, 4.6%-5.7%) were vomiting. The odds ratio (OR) of occurrence of any adverse event, serious adverse events, and vomiting did not change significantly with each additional hour of fasting duration for both solids (any adverse event: OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.02; serious adverse events, OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.95-1.07; vomiting: OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.97-1.03) and liquids (any adverse event: OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.98-1.02; serious adverse events: 1.01, 95% CI, 0.95-1.07; vomiting: OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.96-1.03).
In this study, there was no association between fasting duration and any type of adverse event. These findings do not support delaying sedation to meet established fasting guidelines.
目前尚不清楚在急诊科(ED)对儿童进行镇静时,遵守术前禁食指南是否能预防肺吸入和相关不良后果。
在大量儿童样本中研究术前禁食时间与镇静相关不良结局之间的关系。
设计、地点和参与者:我们对 2010 年 7 月至 2015 年 2 月期间,在加拿大 6 家儿科 ED 中,因疼痛性操作而接受程序性镇静的 0 至 18 岁儿童进行了一项多中心前瞻性队列研究的二次分析。主要风险因素是术前禁食时间。次要风险因素为年龄、性别、美国麻醉医师协会分类、术前和镇静药物以及手术类型。
共纳入 6183 名儿童,中位年龄为 8.0 岁(四分位距,4.0-12.0 岁),其中 6166 名(99.7%)患有健康或轻度全身性疾病(美国麻醉医师协会 I 或 II 级)。分析中包括 2974 名(48.1%)和 310 名(5.0%)儿童分别未遵守固体和液体的美国麻醉医师协会禁食指南。没有肺吸入的病例。发生 717 例不良事件(11.6%;95%CI,10.8%-12.4%),其中 68 例(1.1%;95%CI,0.9%-1.3%)为严重不良事件,315 例(5.1%;95%CI,4.6%-5.7%)为呕吐。每增加 1 小时禁食时间,固体(任何不良事件:OR,1.00;95%CI,0.98 至 1.02;严重不良事件,OR,1.01;95%CI,0.95-1.07;呕吐,OR,1.00;95%CI,0.97-1.03)和液体(任何不良事件:OR,1.00;95%CI,0.98-1.02;严重不良事件,OR,1.01;95%CI,0.95-1.07;呕吐,OR,1.00;95%CI,0.96-1.03)禁食时间与任何类型不良事件之间的比值比(OR)均无显著变化。
在这项研究中,禁食时间与任何类型的不良事件均无关联。这些发现不支持为了遵守既定的禁食指南而延迟镇静。