Bjørn H, Roepstorff A, Waller P J, Nansen P
Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Vet Parasitol. 1990 Aug;37(1):21-30. doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(90)90022-4.
Two strains of Oesophagostomum spp., consisting of both O. quadrispinulatum and O. dentatum, were subjected to a controlled in vivo assay for resistance to levamisole and pyrantel by comparison with susceptible isolates. One strain (LEM) was recently isolated from a commercial herd, where sows showed high numbers of strongyle eggs in faeces within 2 weeks of farrowing and following treatment with levamisole at the manufacturer's recommended dose rate 1 week before farrowing. Levamisole had been used as the sole anthelmintic for treatment for at least 7 years on this farm. Treatment with pyrantel in this herd also indicated cross-resistance to this drug. A mixed population of O. quadrispinulatum and O. dentatum of this strain was subjected to controlled in vivo assays. Faecal egg count reduction (FECR) was found to be -573.3% (P greater than 0.05) and worm count reductions (WCR) of O. quadrispinulatum and O. dentatum were estimated as 44.5% (P greater than 0.05) and 96.4% (P less than 0.001), respectively. Treatment with pyrantel showed that cross-resistance existed to this drug, with FECR of 10.4% (P greater than 0.05) and WCR of 64.5% (P greater than 0.05) and 90.7% (P less than 0.05) for O. quadrispinulatum and O. dentatum, respectively. Another strain (VJ) was isolated from another commercial pig herd, which was dosed with pyrantel citrate four times a year for at least 8 years. This strain showed resistance to pyrantel, with FECR of 43.8% (P greater than 0.05) and WCR of 65.9% (P greater than 0.05) and 49.4% (P greater than 0.05) for O. quadrispinulatum and O. dentatum, respectively. However, both species were susceptible to levamisole. Our results suggested that selection with levamisole gave rise to levamisole resistance and automatically conferred resistance to pyrantel, whereas selection with pyrantel only resulted in resistance to this drug alone. These findings are discussed in relation to the location of the two species of Oesophagostomum in the large intestine of pigs and the mode of action of this class of anthelmintics.
选用两种食道口线虫菌株,包括四刺食道口线虫和有齿食道口线虫,通过与敏感分离株比较,进行了左旋咪唑和噻嘧啶体内抗药性对照试验。其中一个菌株(LEM)最近从一个商业猪群中分离得到,该猪群中的母猪在分娩后2周内粪便中出现大量圆线虫卵,并且在分娩前1周按照制造商推荐的剂量率用左旋咪唑进行治疗。在这个猪场,左旋咪唑作为唯一的驱虫药已使用至少7年。该猪群中使用噻嘧啶治疗也表明对该药存在交叉抗药性。对该菌株的四刺食道口线虫和有齿食道口线虫混合种群进行了体内对照试验。结果发现粪便虫卵计数减少率(FECR)为-573.3%(P>0.05),四刺食道口线虫和有齿食道口线虫的虫体计数减少率(WCR)分别估计为44.5%(P>0.05)和96.4%(P<0.001)。使用噻嘧啶治疗表明对该药存在交叉抗药性,四刺食道口线虫和有齿食道口线虫的FECR分别为10.4%(P>0.05),WCR分别为64.5%(P>0.05)和90.7%(P<0.05)。另一个菌株(VJ)从另一个商业猪群中分离得到,该猪群每年用枸橼酸噻嘧啶给药4次,至少持续了8年。该菌株对噻嘧啶表现出抗药性,四刺食道口线虫和有齿食道口线虫的FECR分别为43.8%(P>0.05),WCR分别为65.9%(P>0.05)和49.4%(P>0.05)。然而,这两个物种对左旋咪唑均敏感。我们的结果表明,用左旋咪唑进行选择会产生左旋咪唑抗药性,并自动赋予对噻嘧啶的抗药性,而用噻嘧啶进行选择只会导致对该药的抗药性。结合猪大肠中两种食道口线虫的位置以及这类驱虫药的作用方式对这些发现进行了讨论。