• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

首次开发和验证用于头颈部癌症患者的特定于言语的感知言语评估工具:伦敦言语评估(LSE)量表。

Development and validation of first-ever speech-specific perceptual speech evaluation tool for patients with head and neck cancer: the London speech evaluation (LSE) scale.

机构信息

Head and Neck Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Head Neck. 2012 Jan;34(1):94-103. doi: 10.1002/hed.21683. Epub 2011 Apr 5.

DOI:10.1002/hed.21683
PMID:21469245
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to develop and validate the first ever speech-specific perceptual speech-evaluation tool for patients with head and neck cancer.

METHODS

Five speech parameters (intelligibility, articulation, speech rate, nasality, and asthenia) and overall grade were included and evaluated. Speech samples of 117 subjects were recorded on electroglottograph equipment using a standard protocol and were independently judged and rated by 3 experienced speech and language therapists and re-rated 12 weeks apart.

RESULTS

Among patients the Cronbach's alpha (α) coefficients for internal consistency for connected speech were 0.89, whereas for single words the α coefficients ranged between 0.80 and 0.84. The Spearman's correlation coefficients for intra-rater reliability for connected speech and words varied between 0.30 and 0.90 and 0.49 and 0.76, respectively, whereas for inter-rater reliability the coefficients ranged between 0.53 and 0.99 and 0.56 and 0.99, respectively. For construct validity, the Spearman's correlation coefficient ranged between 0.41 and 0.55.

CONCLUSIONS

The London Speech Evaluation (LSE) scale demonstrated a high reliability and validity in our cohort of patients with head and neck cancer. surgery.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在开发并验证首个针对头颈部癌症患者的特定于言语的感知言语评估工具。

方法

纳入了 5 个言语参数(可懂度、清晰度、言语速度、鼻音度和乏力度)和整体等级,并进行了评估。117 名受试者的言语样本使用标准方案通过言语电声门图设备进行记录,由 3 名经验丰富的言语和语言治疗师进行独立判断和评分,并在 12 周后重新评分。

结果

在患者中,连贯言语的内部一致性 Cronbach's alpha(α)系数为 0.89,而单词语音的 α系数范围在 0.80 至 0.84 之间。连贯言语和单词的内部评估者可靠性的 Spearman 相关系数分别在 0.30 至 0.90 和 0.49 至 0.76 之间,而外部评估者可靠性的系数范围分别在 0.53 至 0.99 和 0.56 至 0.99 之间。对于结构有效性,Spearman 相关系数范围在 0.41 至 0.55 之间。

结论

伦敦言语评估(LSE)量表在我们的头颈部癌症患者队列中表现出了较高的可靠性和有效性。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of first-ever speech-specific perceptual speech evaluation tool for patients with head and neck cancer: the London speech evaluation (LSE) scale.首次开发和验证用于头颈部癌症患者的特定于言语的感知言语评估工具:伦敦言语评估(LSE)量表。
Head Neck. 2012 Jan;34(1):94-103. doi: 10.1002/hed.21683. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
2
Reliability results of perceptual ratings of resonance, nasal airflow and speech acceptability in patients with cleft palate by Ugandan speech-language pathologists following a two-day workshop.经为期两天的研讨会培训后,乌干达言语病理学家对腭裂患者的共鸣、鼻腔气流和语音可接受性的感知评估的可靠性结果。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Sep;136:110191. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110191. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
3
Acoustic parameters of speech: Lack of correlation with perceptual and questionnaire-based speech evaluation in patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer treated with primary surgery.言语的声学参数:在接受原发手术治疗的口腔和口咽癌患者中,与基于感知和问卷的言语评估缺乏相关性。
Head Neck. 2016 May;38(5):670-6. doi: 10.1002/hed.23956. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
4
Validation of an Intelligibility Assessment Tool in an Indian Language for Perceptual Speech Analysis in Oral Cancer Patients.一种用于口腔癌患者感知语音分析的印度语言清晰度评估工具的验证
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2021 Mar;12(1):100-107. doi: 10.1007/s13193-020-01216-1. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
5
Automatic modelling of perceptual judges in the context of head and neck cancer speech intelligibility.头颈部癌症言语可懂度感知判断的自动建模。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Jul-Aug;59(4):1422-1435. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13004. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
6
Development and validation of a speech pathology-specific questionnaire for persons with multiple sclerosis (SMS).多发性硬化症患者言语病理学专用问卷(SMS)的开发与验证
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Dec;21(6):553-563. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2018.1499802. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
7
Translation and validation of EORTC QLQ-H&N 35 into Moroccan Arabic for ENT head and neck cancer patients in Morocco.将欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)的QLQ-H&N 35翻译成摩洛哥阿拉伯语,用于摩洛哥耳鼻喉头颈癌患者,并进行验证。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Sep;273(9):2727-34. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3808-1. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
8
The Influence of Native Language on Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Vocal Samples Completed by Brazilian and Canadian SLPs.母语对巴西和加拿大语言病理学家完成的语音样本听觉感知评估的影响。
J Voice. 2017 Mar;31(2):258.e1-258.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.05.021. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
9
Assessing children's speech intelligibility and oral structures, and functions via an Internet-based telehealth system.通过基于互联网的远程医疗系统评估儿童的言语可懂度和口腔结构及功能。
J Telemed Telecare. 2012 Jun;18(4):198-203. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2012.111116. Epub 2012 May 17.
10
Translation and validation of the Chinese version of the Quality OF Life Radiation Therapy Instrument and the Head & Neck Module (QOL-RTI/H&N).生活质量放疗工具中文版(QOL-RTI/H&N)的翻译和验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Apr 14;12:51. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-51.

引用本文的文献

1
Dutch translation and validation of the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB)-short form.荷兰语翻译和验证交际参与项目库(CPIB)-简短形式。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Jan;58(1):124-137. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12775. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
2
Validation of an Intelligibility Assessment Tool in an Indian Language for Perceptual Speech Analysis in Oral Cancer Patients.一种用于口腔癌患者感知语音分析的印度语言清晰度评估工具的验证
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2021 Mar;12(1):100-107. doi: 10.1007/s13193-020-01216-1. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
3
[Systematic retrospective study of oral cancer-related quality of life scale].
[口腔癌相关生活质量量表的系统回顾性研究]
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Aug 1;36(4):410-420. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2018.04.012.
4
Oral cancer malnutrition impacts weight and quality of life.口腔癌营养不良会影响体重和生活质量。
Nutrients. 2015 Mar 27;7(4):2145-60. doi: 10.3390/nu7042145.