Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Apr;30(4):569-73. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0049.
The desire to improve the quality of health care has prompted the increased use of performance measures. These measures examine the outcomes of interventions for evidence of improved health and are used to hold providers accountable for the quality of health care. Yet tension exists regarding the capabilities of the current science of quality measurement. Physicians and researchers often question the validity of these data-for example, the use of hospital claims to measure quality-even as policy makers, payers, and the public seek evidence of improved performance. This article discusses the current impasse in the field of quality measurement and what is needed to overcome this deadlock.
提高医疗质量的愿望促使人们越来越多地使用绩效措施。这些措施通过检查干预措施的结果来衡量健康状况的改善,并用于要求提供者对医疗质量负责。然而,目前质量测量科学的能力仍存在争议。医生和研究人员经常质疑这些数据的有效性,例如使用医院的索赔数据来衡量质量,尽管政策制定者、支付者和公众都在寻求绩效改善的证据。本文讨论了质量测量领域目前的僵局,以及克服这一僵局所需的条件。