• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过从多个健康计划中收集数据来衡量单个医生的绩效:两项测试的结果。

Measuring the performance of individual physicians by collecting data from multiple health plans: the results of a two-state test.

机构信息

America's Health Insurance Plans, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Apr;30(4):673-81. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0070.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0070
PMID:21471488
Abstract

Quality measurement and reporting have emerged as important tools that providers, health plans, and other stakeholders can use to identify gaps in quality and focus resources on improving care. Yet identifying, measuring, and evaluating the care that physicians and other health care providers deliver is complicated by limited data, privacy concerns, and the challenge of trying to compare data from diverse sources. This article describes an effort to pilot-test in Florida and Colorado a consistent approach to individual physician performance measurement using data compiled from multiple health plans. Our approach could be used as the basis for making comparable performance information available nationwide. Additional efforts are needed to address key issues, including ways to effectively engage providers in the use of performance information.

摘要

质量测量和报告已经成为重要的工具,提供者、健康计划和其他利益相关者可以使用这些工具来识别质量差距,并集中资源改善护理。然而,由于数据有限、隐私问题以及试图比较来自不同来源的数据的挑战,确定、衡量和评估医生和其他医疗保健提供者提供的护理服务变得复杂。本文描述了在佛罗里达州和科罗拉多州使用来自多个健康计划的数据试点测试一种一致的个体医生绩效衡量方法的努力。我们的方法可以作为在全国范围内提供可比绩效信息的基础。需要进一步努力解决关键问题,包括如何有效地让提供者参与使用绩效信息。

相似文献

1
Measuring the performance of individual physicians by collecting data from multiple health plans: the results of a two-state test.通过从多个健康计划中收集数据来衡量单个医生的绩效:两项测试的结果。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Apr;30(4):673-81. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0070.
2
Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.实施和使用儿童保健质量指标:实践现状透视
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):217-27.
3
The American Medical Association and physician performance measurement: information for improving patient care.美国医学协会与医师绩效评估:改善患者护理的信息
Tex Med. 2000 Oct;96(10):80-3.
4
[Selection, problems and perspective of quality indicators].[质量指标的选择、问题与展望]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2001 Jun;95(5):361-6.
5
Physician performance assessment: nonequivalence of primary care measures.医生绩效评估:初级保健措施的非等效性
Med Care. 2003 Sep;41(9):1034-47. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000083745.83803.D6.
6
Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.六西格玛:并非胆小者所能驾驭。
Radiol Manage. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):40-53.
7
Quality monitoring and management in commercial health plans.商业健康保险计划中的质量监测与管理
Am J Manag Care. 2008 Jun;14(6):377-86.
8
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.一个就注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断和管理达成社区共识的过程。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953.
9
Evaluation of physician competency and clinical performance in emergency medicine.急诊医学中医师能力与临床表现的评估。
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2009 Nov;27(4):615-26, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2009.07.010.
10
Use of the health plan employer data and information set for measuring and improving the quality of asthma care.使用健康计划雇主数据和信息集来衡量和改善哮喘护理质量。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006 Sep;97(3):298-305. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60793-4.

引用本文的文献

1
What quantifies good primary care in the United States? A review of algorithms and metrics using real-world data.美国的优质初级保健如何量化?使用真实世界数据的算法和指标综述。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Jun 24;24(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02080-y.
2
Predicting the Travel Distance of Patients to Access Healthcare Using Deep Neural Networks.使用深度神经网络预测患者就医的出行距离。
IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2021 Dec 8;10:4900411. doi: 10.1109/JTEHM.2021.3134106. eCollection 2022.
3
Association Between HEDIS Performance and Primary Care Physician Age, Group Affiliation, Training, and Participation in ACA Exchanges.
医疗效果数据和信息集(HEDIS)绩效与初级保健医生年龄、团体归属、培训及参与《平价医疗法案》医保交易所之间的关联
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jun;35(6):1730-1735. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05642-3. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
4
Using claims data to attribute patients with breast, lung, or colorectal cancer to prescribing oncologists.利用索赔数据将乳腺癌、肺癌或结直肠癌患者分配给开处方的肿瘤学家。
Pragmat Obs Res. 2019 Mar 29;10:15-22. doi: 10.2147/POR.S197252. eCollection 2019.
5
A Multifaceted Organizational Physician Assessment Program: Validity Evidence and Implications for the Use of Performance Data.一个多方面的组织医师评估项目:效度证据及绩效数据使用的启示
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2017 Jul 25;1(2):130-140. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2017.05.005. eCollection 2017 Sep.
6
Physician Service Attribution Methods for Examining Provision of Low-Value Care.用于审查低价值医疗服务提供情况的医生服务归因方法
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2017 Jan 13;4(1):1276. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1276. eCollection 2016.
7
Questions Program Directors Need to Answer Before Using Resident Clinical Performance Data.项目主任在使用住院医师临床绩效数据之前需要回答的问题。
J Grad Med Educ. 2016 Oct;8(4):507-509. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00512.1.
8
An analysis of China's physician salary payment system.中国医师薪酬支付体系分析
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2013 Apr;33(2):309-314. doi: 10.1007/s11596-013-1116-9. Epub 2013 Apr 17.
9
Key issues in the design of pay for performance programs.绩效薪酬计划设计中的关键问题。
Eur J Health Econ. 2013 Feb;14(1):117-31. doi: 10.1007/s10198-011-0347-6. Epub 2011 Sep 1.