Dirks Melanie A, Treat Teresa A, Weersing V Robin
J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2011 Mar;33(1):58-68. doi: 10.1007/s10862-010-9206-5. Epub 2010 Oct 16.
This study examined whether the three categories often applied to children's behavior-aggressive, avoidant, and assertive-actually capture the structure of a naturalistic sample of youth behavior coded at a more micro level. A sample of lower-income youth (N = 392; M age = 12.69, SD = 0.95) completed a new multiple-choice measure asking them to select responses to scenarios depicting physical, verbal, and relational provocation by a peer. Youth responses to the vignettes showed the expected associations with self-reported aggression and regulation of anger, providing preliminary evidence for the convergent validity of the measure. Factor analysis confirmed that responses loaded on three factors: aggression, avoidance, and assertion. Model fit was adequate (RMSEA = .028) and cross-validated in a second sample (RMSEA = .039). Several types of responses loaded on two factors suggesting that some strategies that youth use to manage provocation are not "pure" examples of these broadband categories. Implications for conceptualization and measurement of youth social behavior are discussed.
本研究探讨了通常应用于儿童行为的三类行为——攻击型、回避型和自信型——是否真的能够反映在更微观层面编码的青少年自然主义行为样本的结构。一个低收入青少年样本(N = 392;平均年龄 = 12.69,标准差 = 0.95)完成了一项新的多项选择测量,要求他们选择对同伴进行身体、言语和关系挑衅场景的反应。青少年对这些小场景的反应显示出与自我报告的攻击行为和愤怒调节的预期关联,为该测量的聚合效度提供了初步证据。因子分析证实,反应加载在三个因子上:攻击、回避和自信。模型拟合良好(RMSEA = 0.028),并在第二个样本中进行了交叉验证(RMSEA = 0.039)。几种类型的反应加载在两个因子上,这表明青少年用来应对挑衅的一些策略并非这些宽泛类别中的“纯粹”示例。讨论了对青少年社会行为概念化和测量的影响。