Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.
Lasers Med Sci. 2012 Jan;27(1):153-60. doi: 10.1007/s10103-011-0918-x. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different techniques of surface treatment on the microleakage of a fissure sealant in molar teeth. A total of 50 freshly extracted noncarious human third molars were randomly assigned to one of five groups. Occlusal fissures were treated with one of the following: acid etching with 35% orthophosphoric acid (group 1); fissurotomy with a Fissurotomy Micro NTF metal bur (group 2); laser etching with an Er,Cr:YSGG laser at 2 W and 20 Hz (group 3); laser etching with an Er,Cr:YSGG laser at 2 W and 40 Hz (group 4); and air abrasion for 20 s with 30-µm Al(2)O(3) particles via a CoJet Prep device (group 5). After surface pretreatment, a resin-based sealant was applied to the fissures. The sample teeth were subjected to thermocycling and stored in distilled water at 37°C for 1 month. Following immersion in 0.5% basic fuchsin solution for 24 h, three buccolingual slices of each sample tooth were scored under a stereomicroscope, and the morphological appearance of the area between the enamel surface and fissure sealant was examined under a scanning electron microscope. The Kruskal-Wallis test and one-way ANOVA revealed significant differences in marginal leakage, as follows: group 1 showed significantly lower scores than groups 2 and 5, the scores of groups 1, 3 and 4 were not significantly different, and group 2 showed significantly higher scores than groups 3 and 4. Laser irradiation, the metal bur, and the CoJet Prep device did not eliminate the need for acid etching of the enamel prior to placement of a fissure sealant. Laser etching at 2 W (20 Hz or 40 Hz) may be an alternative to conventional acid-etching.
本研究旨在评估不同表面处理技术对窝沟封闭剂微渗漏的影响。共选取 50 颗新鲜无龋第三磨牙,随机分为 5 组。采用以下方法处理咬合面窝沟:35%磷酸酸蚀(第 1 组);Fissurotomy Micro NTF 金属车针窝沟切开(第 2 组);2 W、20 Hz 的 Er,Cr:YSGG 激光蚀刻(第 3 组);2 W、40 Hz 的 Er,Cr:YSGG 激光蚀刻(第 4 组);CoJet Prep 装置用 30-μm Al2O3 颗粒喷砂 20 s(第 5 组)。表面预处理后,将树脂基封闭剂应用于窝沟。将样本牙进行热循环,在 37°C 的蒸馏水中储存 1 个月。将样本在 0.5%碱性品红溶液中浸泡 24 h 后,对每个样本牙的三个颊舌切片进行评分,在体视显微镜下观察牙釉质表面和窝沟封闭剂之间区域的形态外观,在扫描电子显微镜下进行检查。Kruskal-Wallis 检验和单因素方差分析显示,边缘渗漏存在显著差异,如下:第 1 组的评分显著低于第 2 组和第 5 组,第 1、3 和 4 组的评分无显著差异,第 2 组的评分显著高于第 3 组和第 4 组。激光照射、金属车针和 CoJet Prep 装置并不能消除在放置窝沟封闭剂之前对牙釉质进行酸蚀的必要性。2 W(20 Hz 或 40 Hz)激光蚀刻可能是传统酸蚀的替代方法。