Turner Leah, McLaren Suzanne
University of Ballarat, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia.
Women Health. 2011 Mar;51(2):151-67. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2011.558004.
This study examined the applicability of the compensatory, risk-protective, and protective-protective models of resiliency to explain the association of depressive symptoms (outcome factor) with rumination (potential risk factor) and social support and sense of belonging (protective factors). A community sample of 179 Australian women between the ages of 18-64 participated. Results supported the compensatory models for both protective factors. Results did not support the risk-protective or protective-protective models. The results of this study indicate that interventions aimed at reducing depressive symptoms among women who ruminate should be focused on increasing either protective factor, and that little value is accrued in attempting to increase both protective factors.
本研究考察了复原力的补偿模型、风险保护模型和保护-保护模型在解释抑郁症状(结果因素)与沉思(潜在风险因素)以及社会支持和归属感(保护因素)之间关联方面的适用性。选取了179名年龄在18至64岁之间的澳大利亚女性作为社区样本参与研究。结果支持了两种保护因素的补偿模型。结果不支持风险保护模型或保护-保护模型。本研究结果表明,旨在减少沉思女性抑郁症状的干预措施应侧重于增加其中一种保护因素,试图同时增加两种保护因素几乎没有价值。