The Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
Heart. 2011 Jul;97(13):1034-40. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2010.215350. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
Previous randomised controlled trials (RCT) regarding n-3 PUFA supplementation for atrial fibrillation (AF) prevention have yielded conflicting results.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT was conducted to examine the role of n-3 PUFA in AF prevention.
MEDLINE, Web of Science and Cochrane clinical trials database were searched until November 2010.
Of 127 initially identified studies, 10 RCT with 1955 patients were finally analysed.
Two blinded reviewers extracted data independently to a predefined form. Disagreements were resolved through discussion and consensus.
n-3 PUFA had no significant effect on the prevention of AF (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.15; p=0.24). There was significant heterogeneity among the studies (p=0.002, I(2)=65.0%). Subgroup analysis showed no significant beneficial effect of fish oils in any subset of population.
No significant effects of n-3 PUFA supplementation on AF prevention were observed in this meta-analysis. A large-scale trial with higher doses and longer follow-up might be required to rule out the possibility of any treatment benefit.
先前关于 n-3 多不饱和脂肪酸(PUFA)补充剂预防心房颤动(AF)的随机对照试验(RCT)结果相互矛盾。
系统评价和荟萃分析 RCT 以检验 n-3 PUFA 在预防 AF 中的作用。
检索 MEDLINE、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 临床试验数据库,截至 2010 年 11 月。
在最初确定的 127 项研究中,最终分析了 10 项 RCT 共 1955 例患者。
两名盲法评价员独立地将数据提取到预先设定的表格中。意见分歧通过讨论和共识解决。
n-3 PUFA 对预防 AF 无显著作用(OR 0.81,95%CI 0.57 至 1.15;p=0.24)。研究间存在显著异质性(p=0.002,I(2)=65.0%)。亚组分析显示,任何人群亚组中鱼油均无显著有益效果。
本荟萃分析未观察到 n-3 PUFA 补充对 AF 预防的显著影响。可能需要进行更大规模、更高剂量和更长随访时间的试验以排除任何治疗益处的可能性。