• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当内分泌学与民主碰撞:情绪、皮质醇与国家选举投票。

When endocrinology and democracy collide: emotions, cortisol and voting at national elections.

机构信息

School of Political Science, University of Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011 Nov;21(11):789-95. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2011.03.003. Epub 2011 Apr 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2011.03.003
PMID:21482457
Abstract

Faced with stressful experiences, such as uncertainty or novelty, the adrenal glands secrete glucocorticoid hormones to help us cope with stress. Since many decision-making situations are stressful, there is reason to believe that voting is a stressful event. In this study, we asked voters in Israel's national election (N=113) to report on their general affective state immediately before entering the polling place using the Positive Affect Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) and to provide us with a saliva sample through which we could evaluate their cortisol levels. Compared to a second sample of voters who reported their affective state on election night (N=70), we found that voters at the ballot box had higher positive and negative affect. Moreover, our voters at the polling place exhibited cortisol levels that were significantly higher than their own normal levels obtained on a similar day, and significantly higher than those of a second control group sampled the day after the elections (N=6). Our data demonstrate that elections are exciting, yet stressful events, and it is this stress, among other factors, that elevates the cortisol levels of voters. Since elevated cortisol has been found to affect memory consolidation, impair memory retrieval and lead to risk-seeking behavior, we discuss how these outcomes of elevated cortisol levels may affect voting in general and the field of electoral studies in particular.

摘要

面对压力体验,如不确定性或新奇性,肾上腺分泌糖皮质激素帮助我们应对压力。由于许多决策情况是有压力的,因此有理由相信投票是一个有压力的事件。在这项研究中,我们要求以色列全国选举中的选民(N=113)使用积极和消极情绪量表(PANAS)在进入投票站之前立即报告他们的一般情绪状态,并通过唾液样本,我们可以评估他们的皮质醇水平。与报告选举夜情绪状态的第二组选民(N=70)相比,我们发现投票站的选民具有更高的积极和消极情绪。此外,我们在投票站的选民的皮质醇水平明显高于他们在类似日子获得的正常水平,也明显高于选举后第二天抽样的第二组对照组(N=6)。我们的数据表明,选举是令人兴奋但有压力的事件,正是这种压力以及其他因素,导致选民的皮质醇水平升高。由于皮质醇升高已被发现会影响记忆巩固、损害记忆检索并导致冒险行为,因此我们讨论了这些皮质醇水平升高的结果如何影响一般投票,特别是选举研究领域。

相似文献

1
When endocrinology and democracy collide: emotions, cortisol and voting at national elections.当内分泌学与民主碰撞:情绪、皮质醇与国家选举投票。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011 Nov;21(11):789-95. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2011.03.003. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
2
Stressful politics: voters' cortisol responses to the outcome of the 2008 United States Presidential election.压力重重的政治:选民对 2008 年美国总统选举结果的皮质醇反应。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2010 Jun;35(5):768-74. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.10.018. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
3
Voting at Home Is Associated with Lower Cortisol than Voting at the Polls.在家投票比在投票站投票时的皮质醇水平更低。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 3;10(9):e0135289. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135289. eCollection 2015.
4
Evaluation of the saliva cortisol levels in patients under prosthetic treatment due to functional disorders of the masticatory organ.咀嚼器官功能紊乱所致修复治疗患者唾液皮质醇水平的评估。
J Physiol Pharmacol. 2015 Feb;66(1):149-54.
5
True or false? Memory is differentially affected by stress-induced cortisol elevations and sympathetic activity at consolidation and retrieval.判断对错:在记忆巩固和提取过程中,压力诱导的皮质醇升高和交感神经活动对记忆的影响存在差异。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2008 Nov;33(10):1378-86. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.07.009. Epub 2008 Sep 13.
6
Optimism, positive affectivity, and salivary cortisol.乐观、积极情感与唾液皮质醇
Br J Health Psychol. 2005 Nov;10(Pt 4):467-84. doi: 10.1348/135910705X26083.
7
Effects of prolonged stress on salivary cortisol and dehydroepiandrosterone: a study of a two-week teaching practice.长期压力对唾液皮质醇和脱氢表雄酮的影响:为期两周的教学实习研究。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2012 Jun;37(6):852-8. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
8
Modulatory effects of stress on reactivated emotional memories.应激对情绪记忆再激活的调节作用。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2010 Oct;35(9):1388-96. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.04.002. Epub 2010 May 14.
9
Stress-induced cortisol level elevations are associated with reduced negative affect after stress: indications for a mood-buffering cortisol effect.应激引起的皮质醇水平升高与应激后负性情绪减少有关:皮质醇具有情绪缓冲效应的迹象。
Psychosom Med. 2012 Jan;74(1):23-32. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31823a4a25. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
10
Daily cortisol, stress reactivity and psychotic experiences in individuals at above average genetic risk for psychosis.日常皮质醇、应激反应与处于精神分裂症遗传高风险个体的精神病性体验。
Psychol Med. 2011 Nov;41(11):2305-15. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711000602. Epub 2011 May 16.

引用本文的文献

1
County-level political group density, partisan polarization, and individual-level mortality among adults in the United States: A lagged multilevel study.美国成年人县级政治团体密度、党派两极分化与个体层面死亡率:一项滞后多层次研究。
SSM Popul Health. 2024 Mar 19;26:101662. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101662. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Conspiracy beliefs and perceptual inference in times of political uncertainty.政治不确定性时期的阴谋论信念与感知推理
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 18;14(1):9001. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59434-4.
3
Trajectories of sociopolitical stress during the 2020 United States presidential election season: Associations with psychological well-being, civic action, and social identities.
2020年美国总统选举季期间的社会政治压力轨迹:与心理健康、公民行动和社会身份的关联。
Compr Psychoneuroendocrinol. 2023 Oct 31;16:100218. doi: 10.1016/j.cpnec.2023.100218. eCollection 2023 Nov.
4
ADHD and political participation: An observational study.注意缺陷多动障碍与政治参与:一项观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 21;18(2):e0280445. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280445. eCollection 2023.
5
Age, education, and political involvement differences in daily election-related stress.与选举相关的日常压力在年龄、教育程度和政治参与方面的差异。
Curr Psychol. 2022 May 28:1-10. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-02979-2.
6
Elections have Consequences: Partisan Politics may be Literally Killing Us.选举有后果:党派政治可能真的要了我们的命。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021 Jan;19(1):45-56. doi: 10.1007/s40258-020-00621-5. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
7
Political events and mood among young physicians: a prospective cohort study.年轻医生的政治事件和情绪:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ. 2019 Dec 9;367:l6322. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6322.
8
Voting at Home Is Associated with Lower Cortisol than Voting at the Polls.在家投票比在投票站投票时的皮质醇水平更低。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 3;10(9):e0135289. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135289. eCollection 2015.
9
Cortisol and politics: variance in voting behavior is predicted by baseline cortisol levels.皮质醇与政治:投票行为的差异可由基础皮质醇水平预测。
Physiol Behav. 2014 Jun 22;133:61-7. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.05.004. Epub 2014 May 14.