Keyes Katherine M, Keyes Margaret A, March Dana, Susser Ezra
Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Ment Health Subst Use. 2011 Jan 1;4(1):22-37. doi: 10.1080/17523281.2011.533445.
Disruptive behavior in adolescence may indicate a broad vulnerability to disinhibition, which begins in childhood and culminates in adult externalizing psychopathology. We utilized prospective birth cohort data to assess childhood predictors of adolescent disinhibition. We also examined the effect of pre-adolescent fluctuation in cognitive ability. METHODS: Data were drawn from the Child Health and Development Study cohort, born 1961-1963; we used the subsample who participated in follow-up through adolescence (n=1752). Six indicators of behavioral disinhibition (BD), reported in adolescence, were analyzed as a count outcome. Predictor variables were drawn from several waves of data collection and included individual-, maternal-, and neighborhood-level measures. Cognitive ability was assessed with the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test at two time points. Neighborhood characteristics were assessed using census data from 1970. RESULTS: Number of BD indicators was predicted by maternal characteristics at prenatal assessment (maternal age and alcohol consumption) and age-10 assessment (maternal smoking, education, and separation from father). Characteristics of the child that predicted BD included birth order and conduct problems in middle childhood. Neighborhood poverty did not predict BD. Regardless of initial cognitive ability score, movement to a higher quartile by adolescence was associated with lower BD, while movement to a lower quartile was associated with higher BD. CONCLUSION: Risk for adolescent BD exists prenatally and extends through middle childhood. Change in cognitive ability during pre-adolescence emerged as a potentially important factor that merits further investigation. A greater focus on the life course can aid in comprehensively understanding disruptive behavior emergence in adolescence.
青少年期的破坏性行为可能表明存在广泛的抑制不足易感性,这种易感性始于童年并在成人期发展为外化性精神病理学。我们利用前瞻性出生队列数据来评估青少年抑制不足的童年预测因素。我们还研究了青春期前认知能力波动的影响。方法:数据取自1961 - 1963年出生的儿童健康与发展研究队列;我们使用了参与青春期随访的子样本(n = 1752)。将青少年期报告的六个行为抑制(BD)指标作为计数结果进行分析。预测变量来自多个数据收集波次,包括个体、母亲和邻里层面的测量。在两个时间点用皮博迪图片词汇测试评估认知能力。使用1970年的人口普查数据评估邻里特征。结果:BD指标的数量可由产前评估时的母亲特征(母亲年龄和饮酒情况)以及10岁时的评估(母亲吸烟、教育程度和与父亲分居情况)预测。预测BD的儿童特征包括出生顺序和童年中期的行为问题。邻里贫困不能预测BD。无论初始认知能力得分如何,到青春期时认知能力提升到更高四分位数与较低的BD相关,而降至较低四分位数则与较高的BD相关。结论:青少年BD的风险在产前就已存在,并贯穿童年中期。青春期前认知能力的变化成为一个潜在的重要因素,值得进一步研究。更关注生命历程有助于全面理解青少年期破坏性行为的出现。