Suppr超能文献

使用功能性经颅多普勒和功能性磁共振成像测量语言侧化:批判性评估

The Measurement of Language Lateralization with Functional Transcranial Doppler and Functional MRI: A Critical Evaluation.

作者信息

Somers Metten, Neggers Sebastiaan F, Diederen Kelly M, Boks Marco P, Kahn René S, Sommer Iris E

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Mar 28;5:31. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00031. eCollection 2011.

Abstract

Cerebral language lateralization can be assessed in several ways. In healthy subjects, functional MRI (fMRI) during performance of a language task has evolved to be the most frequently applied method. Functional transcranial Doppler (fTCD) may provide a valid alternative, but has been used rarely. Both techniques have their own strengths and weaknesses and as a result may be applied in different fields of research. Until now, only one relatively small study (n = 13) investigated the correlation between lateralization indices (LIs) measured by fTCD and fMRI and showed a remarkably high correlation. To further evaluate the correlation between LIs measured with fTCD and fMRI, we compared LIs of 22 healthy subjects (12 left- and 10 right-handed) using the same word generation paradigm for the fTCD as for the fMRI experiment. LIs measured with fTCD were highly but imperfectly correlated with LIs measured with fMRI (Spearman's rho = 0.75, p < 0.001). The imperfectness of the correlation can partially be explained by methodological restrictions of fMRI as well as fTCD. Our results suggest that fTCD can be a valid alternative for fMRI to measure lateralization, particularly when costs or mobility are important factors in the study design.

摘要

脑语言侧化可以通过多种方式进行评估。在健康受试者中,执行语言任务时的功能磁共振成像(fMRI)已逐渐成为最常用的方法。功能性经颅多普勒(fTCD)可能是一种有效的替代方法,但很少被使用。这两种技术都有各自的优缺点,因此可能适用于不同的研究领域。到目前为止,只有一项相对较小的研究(n = 13)调查了fTCD和fMRI测量的侧化指数(LIs)之间的相关性,并显示出非常高的相关性。为了进一步评估fTCD和fMRI测量的LIs之间的相关性,我们使用与fMRI实验相同的单词生成范式,比较了22名健康受试者(12名左利手和10名右利手)的LIs。fTCD测量的LIs与fMRI测量的LIs高度相关但不完全相关(斯皮尔曼等级相关系数rho = 0.75,p < 0.001)。相关性的不完全性可以部分地由fMRI以及fTCD的方法学限制来解释。我们的结果表明,fTCD可以作为fMRI测量侧化的有效替代方法,特别是当成本或可移动性是研究设计中的重要因素时。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/540c/3069547/bab1fadb777d/fnhum-05-00031-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验