López-Navas A, Ríos A, Riquelme A, Martínez-Alarcón L, Pons J A, Miras M, Sanmartín A, Febrero B, Ramírez P, Parrilla P
International Collaborative Donor Project, Murcia, España.
Transplant Proc. 2011 Apr;43(3):701-4. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.01.095.
In patients awaiting a transplant, the help received from friends and/or family members is considered to be an important factor in the transplantation process. Our objective was to determine the level of social/family support for patients on the liver transplant waiting list and to determine the relationship between clinical psychopathology and the level of social/family support.
The study population consisted of 70 patients on the liver transplant waiting list. We used the following instruments: (1) Medical Outcomes Study-Social Support Survey (MOS) Questionnaire. For size of the social network, four support dimensions and a global support index for emotional support, material/instrumental support, leisure/free time activities, and love/care; (2) Family Apgar Questionnaire for personal perception of family function; (3) SA-45 questionnaire of psychopathologic symptoms for somatizations, obsessive-compulsivity, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, phobic anxiety, paranoid ideation, and psychoticism.
The MOS showed that the mean size of the social network of these patients was 12 people. In these patients, social/family support was nonfunctional in 20% of the cases. By dimensions, the patients had the following percentage of nonfunctional support: 24% in emotional support; 10% material/instrumental support; 23% social relations of leisure/free-time activities; and 11% compassionate love/care support. The patients with nonfunctional support had the following associated psychopathologic symptoms (SA-45): depression (79% vs 39%; P = .008), anxiety (86% vs 46%; P = .008), hostility (43% vs 12%; P = .009), and psychoticism (14% vs 2%; P = .039) compared to functional patients. The Family Apgar showed that 27% of patients perceived a family dysfunction. These patients had greater interpersonal sensitivity-type emotional symptoms (32% vs 8%; P = .012), depression (79% vs 35%; P = .001), anxiety (79% vs 45%; P = .011), and hostility (42% vs 10%; P = .002) compared to normally functioning patients.
Nearly a quarter of patients on the liver transplant waiting list have social/family support that is nonfunctional, which leads to greater emotional psychopathologic symptoms that would need to be treated.
在等待移植的患者中,朋友和/或家庭成员提供的帮助被认为是移植过程中的一个重要因素。我们的目标是确定肝移植等待名单上患者的社会/家庭支持水平,并确定临床精神病理学与社会/家庭支持水平之间的关系。
研究人群包括70名肝移植等待名单上的患者。我们使用了以下工具:(1)医学结局研究-社会支持调查问卷(MOS)。用于评估社交网络规模、情感支持、物质/工具性支持、休闲/自由时间活动以及关爱/照顾这四个支持维度和一个总体支持指数;(2)家庭功能适应度问卷,用于个人对家庭功能的感知;(3)SA-45精神病理症状问卷,用于评估躯体化、强迫观念与行为、人际敏感性、抑郁、焦虑、敌对、恐惧焦虑、偏执观念和精神分裂症等症状。
MOS显示,这些患者社交网络的平均规模为12人。在这些患者中,20%的病例社会/家庭支持无效。按维度划分,患者无效支持的比例如下:情感支持方面为24%;物质/工具性支持方面为10%;休闲/自由时间活动的社会关系方面为23%;关爱/照顾支持方面为11%。与支持有效的患者相比,支持无效的患者存在以下相关精神病理症状(SA-45):抑郁(79%对39%;P = 0.008)、焦虑(86%对46%;P = 0.008)、敌对(43%对12%;P = 0.009)和精神分裂症(14%对
2%;P = 0.039)。家庭功能适应度问卷显示,27%的患者认为家庭功能失调。与家庭功能正常的患者相比,这些患者存在更强的人际敏感性类型的情感症状(32%对8%;P = 0.0
12)、抑郁(79%对
35%;P = 0.001)、焦虑(79%对45%;P = 0.011)和敌对(42%对10%;P = 0.002)。
肝移植等待名单上近四分之一的患者社会/家庭支持无效,这导致了更严重的情感精神病理症状,需要进行治疗。