Institute of Public Health, Sport, and Nutrition, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2011 Mar;6(1):70-81. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.6.1.70.
This study was designed to quantify the daily distribution of training intensity in a group of professional soccer players in Norway based on three different methods of training intensity quantification.
Fifteen male athletes (age, 24 ± 5 y) performed treadmill test to exhaustion to determine heart rate and VO2 corresponding to ventilatory thresholds (VT1, VT2), maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) and maximal heart rate. VT1 and VT2 were used to delineate three intensity zones based on heart rate. During a 4 wk period in the preseason (N = 15), and two separate weeks late in the season (N = 11), all endurance and on-ball training sessions (preseason: N = 378, season: N= 78) were quantified using continuous heart rate registration and session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE). Three different methods were used to quantify the intensity distribution: time in zone, session goal and sRPE.
Intensity distributions across all sessions were similar when based on session goal or by sRPE. However, intensity distribution based on heart rate cut-offs from standardized testing was significantly different (time in zone).
Our findings suggest that quantifying training intensity by using heart rate based total time in zone is not valid for describing the effective training intensity in soccer. The results also suggest that the daily training intensity distribution in this representative group of high level Norwegian soccer players is organized after a pattern where about the same numbers of training sessions are performed in low lactate, lactate threshold, and high intensity training zones.
本研究旨在基于三种不同的训练强度量化方法,量化挪威一组职业足球运动员的训练强度的日分布。
15 名男性运动员(年龄 24 ± 5 岁)进行跑步机测试至力竭,以确定心率和 VO2 对应于通气阈值(VT1、VT2)、最大摄氧量(VO2max)和最大心率。VT1 和 VT2 用于根据心率划定三个强度区。在赛季前的 4 周(N = 15)和赛季后期的两周(N = 11)期间,所有耐力和控球训练课程(赛季前:N = 378,赛季:N = 78)均使用连续心率登记和训练感觉评估(sRPE)进行量化。使用三种不同的方法来量化强度分布:在区时间、训练目标和 sRPE。
基于训练目标或 sRPE 的所有课程的强度分布相似。然而,基于标准化测试的心率截止值的强度分布则显著不同(在区时间)。
我们的研究结果表明,使用基于心率的总在区时间来量化训练强度对于描述足球中的有效训练强度是无效的。结果还表明,在这个具有代表性的高水平挪威足球运动员群体中,每日训练强度分布是按照在低乳酸、乳酸阈和高强度训练区进行相同数量的训练课程的模式组织的。