精神病学中临床访谈与研究访谈的区别。
The Distinction between Clinical and Research Interviews in Psychiatry.
作者信息
Targum Steven D
机构信息
Dr. Targum is a consultant for the Department of Psychiatry at the Massachusetts General Hospital. Dr. Targum is on the editorial board of Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience .
出版信息
Innov Clin Neurosci. 2011 Mar;8(3):40-4.
Abstract
Research interviews require a fact-based, neutral inquiry style that contrasts markedly from the empathic style of clinical interviews in psychiatric practice. In fact, the research interview generally seeks to gather information and specifically avoid any therapeutic benefit. This article describes the purpose of these opposing interview styles and provides some guidelines for beginning clinicians conducting research.
摘要
研究访谈需要一种基于事实的、中立的询问方式，这与精神病学临床实践中临床访谈的共情方式形成鲜明对比。事实上，研究访谈通常旨在收集信息，尤其要避免任何治疗效果。本文描述了这两种相反访谈方式的目的，并为初涉研究的临床医生提供了一些指导方针。
相似文献
1
The Distinction between Clinical and Research Interviews in Psychiatry.精神病学中临床访谈与研究访谈的区别。
Innov Clin Neurosci. 2011 Mar;8(3):40-4.
2
[Diagnostic structured interviews in child and adolescent's psychiatry].[儿童和青少年精神病学中的诊断性结构化访谈]
Encephale. 2004 Mar-Apr;30(2):122-34. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95422-x.
3
Differences between clinical and research practices in diagnosing borderline personality disorder.边缘型人格障碍诊断中临床实践与研究实践的差异。
Am J Psychiatry. 1999 Oct;156(10):1570-4. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.10.1570.
4
Guidelines for Conducting a Victim-Sensitive Interview.进行受害者敏感型访谈的指南。
J Child Sex Abus. 2015;24(7):717-30. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2015.1077365. Epub 2015 Oct 6.
5
Preparing and conducting interviews to collect data.准备并进行访谈以收集数据。
Nurse Res. 2013 May;20(5):28-32. doi: 10.7748/nr2013.05.20.5.28.e327.
6
From Doxastic to Epistemic: A Typology and Critique of Qualitative Interview Styles.从信念到认知：定性访谈风格的类型学与批判
Qual Inq. 2020 Mar;26(3-4):291-305. doi: 10.1177/1077800418810724. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
7
Ward round competences in surgery and psychiatry - a comparative multidisciplinary interview study.外科和精神病学的病房查房能力——一项比较多学科的访谈研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 May 8;19(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1554-6.
8
[Study on psychiatric disorders and defensive process assessed by the "defense style questionnaire" in sterile males SAMPLE consulting in andrology].[通过“防御方式问卷”对男科门诊不育男性样本进行精神障碍与防御过程的研究]
Encephale. 2005 Jul-Aug;31(4 Pt 1):414-25. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82403-0.
9
How children remember what they have eaten.儿童如何记住他们吃过的东西。
J Am Diet Assoc. 1994 Nov;94(11):1267-72. doi: 10.1016/0002-8223(94)92458-9.
10
Assessing the diagnostic validity of a structured psychiatric interview in a first-admission hospital sample.评估在首次入院的医院样本中，结构化精神病学访谈的诊断有效性。
World Psychiatry. 2012 Oct;11(3):181-5. doi: 10.1002/j.2051-5545.2012.tb00128.x.
引用本文的文献
1
Attending to Methodological Challenges in Qualitative Research to Foster Participation of Individuals with Chronic Critical Illness and Communication Impairments.关注定性研究中的方法学挑战，以促进患有慢性危重病和沟通障碍的个体的参与。
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2021 Apr 19;8:23333936211000044. doi: 10.1177/23333936211000044. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
2
Web-Based Graphic Representation of the Life Course of Mental Health: Cross-Sectional Study Across the Spectrum of Mood, Anxiety, Eating, and Substance Use Disorders.基于网络的心理健康生命历程图形表示：跨情绪、焦虑、饮食和物质使用障碍谱系的横断面研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Jan 28;7(1):e16919. doi: 10.2196/16919.
3
Detecting dissonance in clinical and research workflow for translational psychiatric registries.检测转化精神病学登记处的临床和研究工作流程中的不和谐。
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 20;8(9):e75167. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075167. eCollection 2013.
本文引用的文献
1
Development and reliability of a structured interview guide for the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (SIGMA).蒙哥马利-艾斯伯格抑郁评定量表结构化访谈指南（SIGMA）的编制与信度
Br J Psychiatry. 2008 Jan;192(1):52-8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.032532.
2
Interview quality and signal detection in clinical trials.临床试验中的访谈质量与信号检测
Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Mar;162(3):628. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.3.628.
3
The Rater Applied Performance Scale: development and reliability.评估者应用表现量表：开发与信度
Psychiatry Res. 2004 Jun 30;127(1-2):147-55. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2004.03.001.
4
THE MENTAL STATUS SCHEDULE: RATIONALE, RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY.心理状态检查表：基本原理、信度与效度
Compr Psychiatry. 1964 Dec;5(6):384-95. doi: 10.1016/s0010-440x(64)80048-1.
5
Reliability and validity of a structured interview guide for the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (SIGH-A).汉密尔顿焦虑量表结构化访谈指南（SIGH - A）的信度和效度
Depress Anxiety. 2001;13(4):166-78.
6
A structured interview guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.汉密尔顿抑郁量表的结构化访谈指南。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988 Aug;45(8):742-7. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800320058007.
Zotero 插件