Department of Psychology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Sep;213(2-3):275-82. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2668-1. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
Anxious individuals have been shown to interpret others' emotional states negatively. Since most studies have used facial expressions as emotional cues, we examined whether trait anxiety affects the recognition of emotion in a dynamic face and voice that were presented in synchrony. The face and voice cues conveyed either matched (e.g., happy face and voice) or mismatched emotions (e.g., happy face and angry voice). Participants with high or low trait anxiety were to indicate the perceived emotion using one of the cues while ignoring the other. The results showed that individuals with high trait anxiety were more likely to interpret others' emotions in a negative manner, putting more weight on the to-be-ignored angry cues. This interpretation bias was found regardless of the cue modality (i.e., face or voice). Since trait anxiety did not affect recognition of the face or voice cues presented in isolation, this interpretation bias appears to reflect an altered integration of the face and voice cues among anxious individuals.
焦虑个体倾向于消极地解读他人的情绪状态。由于大多数研究都使用面部表情作为情绪线索,我们考察了特质焦虑是否会影响对同步呈现的动态面部表情和声音中情绪的识别。面部表情和声音线索传达的情绪一致(例如,高兴的面部表情和声音)或不一致(例如,高兴的面部表情和愤怒的声音)。高特质焦虑或低特质焦虑的参与者在使用其中一个线索来指示感知到的情绪时忽略另一个线索。结果表明,高特质焦虑个体更倾向于消极地解读他人的情绪,对被忽视的愤怒线索赋予更多的权重。这种解释偏差与线索模态(即面部或声音)无关。由于特质焦虑并不影响对单独呈现的面部或声音线索的识别,因此这种解释偏差似乎反映了焦虑个体对面部和声音线索的整合方式发生了改变。