Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Materials and Process Simulation Center MC139-74, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA.
Proteins. 2011 Jun;79(6):1878-97. doi: 10.1002/prot.23012. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
We used the GEnSeMBLE Monte Carlo method to predict ensemble of the 20 best packings (helix rotations and tilts) based on the neutral total energy (E) from a vast number (10 trillion) of potential packings for each of the four subtypes of the adenosine G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which are involved in many cytoprotective functions. We then used the DarwinDock Monte Carlo methods to predict the binding pose for the human A(3) adenosine receptor (hAA(3)R) for subtype selective agonists and antagonists. We found that all four A(3) agonists stabilize the 15th lowest conformation of apo-hAA(3)R while also binding strongly to the 1st and 3rd. In contrast the four A(3) antagonists stabilize the 2nd or 3rd lowest conformation. These results show that different ligands can stabilize different GPCR conformations, which will likely affect function, complicating the design of functionally unique ligands. Interestingly all agonists lead to a trans χ1 angle for W6.48 that experiments on other GPCRs associate with G-protein activation while all 20 apo-AA(3)R conformations have a W6.48 gauche+ χ1 angle associated experimentally with inactive GPCRs for other systems. Thus docking calculations have identified critical ligand-GPCR structures involved with activation. We found that the predicted binding site for selective agonist Cl-IB-MECA to the predicted structure of hAA(3)R shows favorable interactions to three subtype variable residues, I253(6.58), V169(EL2), and Q167(EL2), while the predicted structure for hAA(2A)R shows weakened to the corresponding amino acids: T256(6.58), E169(EL2), and L167(EL2), explaining the observed subtype selectivity.
我们使用 GEnSEMBLE 蒙特卡罗方法,根据中性总能量 (E) 预测了四个腺苷 G 蛋白偶联受体 (GPCR) 亚型中每一种的大量 (10 万亿) 潜在包装的 20 个最佳包装的集合 (螺旋旋转和倾斜)。我们随后使用 DarwinDock 蒙特卡罗方法预测了人 A(3) 腺苷受体 (hAA(3)R) 对亚型选择性激动剂和拮抗剂的结合构象。我们发现,所有四种 A(3) 激动剂都稳定了 apo-hAA(3)R 的第 15 低构象,同时也与第 1 位和第 3 位结合紧密。相比之下,四种 A(3) 拮抗剂稳定了第 2 位或第 3 位的最低构象。这些结果表明,不同的配体可以稳定不同的 GPCR 构象,这可能会影响功能,使具有独特功能的配体的设计复杂化。有趣的是,所有激动剂都导致 W6.48 的反式 χ1 角,而其他 GPCR 上的实验与 G 蛋白激活相关,而所有 20 种 apo-AA(3)R 构象在其他系统中与无活性 GPCR 相关的实验中都具有 W6.48 gauche+ χ1 角。因此,对接计算确定了与激活相关的关键配体-GPCR 结构。我们发现,选择性激动剂 Cl-IB-MECA 预测结合位点与 hAA(3)R 的预测结构显示出与三个亚型可变残基 I253(6.58)、V169(EL2)和 Q167(EL2)的有利相互作用,而 hAA(2A)R 的预测结构显示与相应的氨基酸的相互作用减弱:T256(6.58)、E169(EL2)和 L167(EL2),解释了观察到的亚型选择性。