• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Optimal Partitioning for Linear Mixed Effects Models: Applications to Identifying Placebo Responders.线性混合效应模型的最优划分:在识别安慰剂反应者中的应用
J Am Stat Assoc. 2010 Jan 1;105(491):968-977. doi: 10.1198/jasa.2010.ap08713.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Stratified Psychiatry via Convexity-Based Clustering with Applications Towards Moderator Analysis.基于凸性聚类的分层精神病学及其在调节分析中的应用
Stat Interface. 2016 Jul 1;9(3):255-266. doi: 10.4310/SII.2016.v9.n3.a1.
4
Preventing depressive relapse and recurrence in higher-risk cognitive therapy responders: a randomized trial of continuation phase cognitive therapy, fluoxetine, or matched pill placebo.在认知疗法高应答风险人群中预防抑郁复发和再发:延续性治疗阶段认知疗法、氟西汀或匹配安慰剂的随机试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Nov;70(11):1152-60. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.1969.
5
The Prevention of Recurrent Episodes of Depression with Venlafaxine for Two Years (PREVENT) Study: Outcomes from the 2-year and combined maintenance phases.文拉法辛预防抑郁症复发两年(PREVENT)研究:两年及联合维持阶段的结果
J Clin Psychiatry. 2007 Aug;68(8):1246-56. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v68n0812.
6
Pretreatment neurophysiological and clinical characteristics of placebo responders in treatment trials for major depression.重度抑郁症治疗试验中安慰剂反应者的预处理神经生理学和临床特征。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2004 Dec;177(1-2):15-22. doi: 10.1007/s00213-004-1919-2. Epub 2004 Jul 14.
7
A mixture model using likelihood-based and Bayesian approaches for identifying responders and non-responders in longitudinal clinical trials.
Pharm Stat. 2014 Sep-Oct;13(5):327-36. doi: 10.1002/pst.1637. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
8
Efficacy in long-term treatment of depression.抑郁症长期治疗的疗效。
J Clin Psychiatry. 1996;57 Suppl 2:24-30.
9
Predicting potential placebo effect in drug treated subjects.预测药物治疗受试者的潜在安慰剂效应。
Int J Biostat. 2009 Jul 6;5(1):Article 23. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1152.
10
Long-term treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder after an acute response: a comparison of fluoxetine versus placebo.急性反应后强迫症的长期治疗:氟西汀与安慰剂的比较。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2001 Feb;21(1):46-52. doi: 10.1097/00004714-200102000-00009.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal partitioning for the proportional hazards model.比例风险模型的最优分割
J Appl Stat. 2020 Nov 18;49(4):968-987. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2020.1846690. eCollection 2022.
2
Partitioning of functional gene expression data using principal points.使用主点对功能基因表达数据进行划分。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2017 Oct 12;18(1):450. doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1860-0.
3
Statistical Analysis Plan for Stage 1 EMBARC (Establishing Moderators and Biosignatures of Antidepressant Response for Clinical Care) Study.第一阶段EMBARC(建立用于临床护理的抗抑郁反应调节因子和生物标志物)研究的统计分析计划。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2017 Jun;6:22-30. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
4
Stratified Psychiatry via Convexity-Based Clustering with Applications Towards Moderator Analysis.基于凸性聚类的分层精神病学及其在调节分析中的应用
Stat Interface. 2016 Jul 1;9(3):255-266. doi: 10.4310/SII.2016.v9.n3.a1.
5
Massively parallel nonparametric regression, with an application to developmental brain mapping.大规模并行非参数回归及其在发育脑图谱中的应用
J Comput Graph Stat. 2014 Jan 1;23(1):232-248. doi: 10.1080/10618600.2012.733549.
6
Principal Point Classification: Applications to Differentiating Drug and Placebo Responses in Longitudinal Studies.主要点分类:在纵向研究中区分药物和安慰剂反应的应用。
J Stat Plan Inference. 2010 Feb 1;140(2):539-550. doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2009.07.030.
7
Partitioning of Functional Data for Understanding Heterogeneity in Psychiatric Conditions.用于理解精神疾病异质性的功能数据划分
Stat Interface. 2009 Jan 1;2(4):413-424. doi: 10.4310/sii.2009.v2.n4.a3.

本文引用的文献

1
Model Misspecification: Finite Mixture or Homogeneous?模型误设:有限混合模型还是齐次模型?
Stat Modelling. 2008;8(2):199-218. doi: 10.1177/1471082X0800800204.
2
Identifying patterns in treatment response profiles in acute bipolar mania: a cluster analysis approach.识别急性双相躁狂症治疗反应概况中的模式:一种聚类分析方法。
BMC Psychiatry. 2008 Jul 29;8:65. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-8-65.
3
Initial severity and antidepressant benefits: a meta-analysis of data submitted to the Food and Drug Administration.初始严重程度与抗抑郁药疗效:对提交给美国食品药品监督管理局的数据进行的荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2008 Feb;5(2):e45. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050045.
4
A Parametric k-Means Algorithm.一种参数化k均值算法。
Comput Stat. 2007 Apr;22(1):71-89. doi: 10.1007/s00180-007-0022-7.
5
Linear Transformations and the k-Means Clustering Algorithm: Applications to Clustering Curves.线性变换与k均值聚类算法:在曲线聚类中的应用
Am Stat. 2007 Feb;61(1):34-40. doi: 10.1198/000313007X171016.
6
The clustering of regression models method with applications in gene expression data.回归模型聚类方法及其在基因表达数据中的应用
Biometrics. 2006 Jun;62(2):526-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00498.x.
7
Using a Bayesian latent growth curve model to identify trajectories of positive affect and negative events following myocardial infarction.使用贝叶斯潜在增长曲线模型来识别心肌梗死后积极情绪和负面事件的轨迹。
Biostatistics. 2005 Jan;6(1):119-43. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxh022.
8
Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: implications for overextraction of latent trajectory classes.增长混合模型的分布假设:对潜在轨迹类过度提取的影响。
Psychol Methods. 2003 Sep;8(3):338-63. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.8.3.338.
9
Clustering of time-course gene expression data using a mixed-effects model with B-splines.使用带有B样条的混合效应模型对时程基因表达数据进行聚类。
Bioinformatics. 2003 Mar 1;19(4):474-82. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg014.
10
A typological model for estimation of drug and placebo effects in depression.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2002 Aug;22(4):414-8. doi: 10.1097/00004714-200208000-00013.

线性混合效应模型的最优划分:在识别安慰剂反应者中的应用

Optimal Partitioning for Linear Mixed Effects Models: Applications to Identifying Placebo Responders.

作者信息

Tarpey Thaddeus, Petkova Eva, Lu Yimeng, Govindarajulu Usha

机构信息

Professor in the Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio 45435.

出版信息

J Am Stat Assoc. 2010 Jan 1;105(491):968-977. doi: 10.1198/jasa.2010.ap08713.

DOI:10.1198/jasa.2010.ap08713
PMID:21494314
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3007089/
Abstract

A long-standing problem in clinical research is distinguishing drug treated subjects that respond due to specific effects of the drug from those that respond to non-specific (or placebo) effects of the treatment. Linear mixed effect models are commonly used to model longitudinal clinical trial data. In this paper we present a solution to the problem of identifying placebo responders using an optimal partitioning methodology for linear mixed effects models. Since individual outcomes in a longitudinal study correspond to curves, the optimal partitioning methodology produces a set of prototypical outcome profiles. The optimal partitioning methodology can accommodate both continuous and discrete covariates. The proposed partitioning strategy is compared and contrasted with the growth mixture modelling approach. The methodology is applied to a two-phase depression clinical trial where subjects in a first phase were treated openly for 12 weeks with fluoxetine followed by a double blind discontinuation phase where responders to treatment in the first phase were randomized to either stay on fluoxetine or switched to a placebo. The optimal partitioning methodology is applied to the first phase to identify prototypical outcome profiles. Using time to relapse in the second phase of the study, a survival analysis is performed on the partitioned data. The optimal partitioning results identify prototypical profiles that distinguish whether subjects relapse depending on whether or not they stay on the drug or are randomized to a placebo.

摘要

临床研究中一个长期存在的问题是,区分因药物的特定作用而产生反应的药物治疗受试者与对治疗的非特异性(或安慰剂)作用产生反应的受试者。线性混合效应模型常用于对纵向临床试验数据进行建模。在本文中,我们提出了一种解决方案,用于使用线性混合效应模型的最优划分方法来识别安慰剂反应者。由于纵向研究中的个体结果对应于曲线,最优划分方法会生成一组典型的结果概况。最优划分方法可以同时处理连续和离散协变量。将所提出的划分策略与增长混合模型方法进行比较和对比。该方法应用于一项两阶段抑郁症临床试验,在第一阶段,受试者接受氟西汀开放治疗12周,随后进入双盲停药阶段,第一阶段治疗有反应的受试者被随机分配继续服用氟西汀或改用安慰剂。最优划分方法应用于第一阶段以识别典型的结果概况。利用研究第二阶段的复发时间,对划分后的数据进行生存分析。最优划分结果识别出了典型概况,这些概况根据受试者是否继续服药或被随机分配到安慰剂组来区分他们是否会复发。