Department of Psychiatry, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Nov;70(11):1152-60. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.1969.
Strategies to improve the course of recurrent major depressive disorder have great public health relevance. To reduce the risk of relapse/recurrence after acute phase cognitive therapy (CT), a continuation phase model of therapy may improve outcomes.
To test the efficacy of continuation phase CT (C-CT) and fluoxetine for relapse prevention in a pill placebo (PBO)-controlled randomized trial and compare the durability of prophylaxis after discontinuation of treatments.
A sequential, 3-stage design with an acute phase (all patients received 12 weeks of CT); 8-month experimental phase (responders at higher risk were randomized to C-CT, fluoxetine, or PBO); and 24 months of longitudinal, posttreatment follow-up.
Two university-based specialty clinics.
A total of 523 adults with recurrent major depressive disorder began acute phase CT, of which 241 higher-risk responders were randomized and 181 subsequently entered the follow-up.
Cognitive therapy responders at higher risk for relapse were randomized to receive 8 months of C-CT (n = 86), fluoxetine (n = 86), or PBO (n = 69).
Survival analyses of relapse/recurrence rates, as determined by blinded evaluators using DSM-IV criteria and the Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation. RESULTS As predicted, the C-CT or fluoxetine groups were significantly less likely to relapse than the PBO group across 8 months. Relapse/recurrence rates for C-CT and fluoxetine were nearly identical during the 8 months of treatment, although C-CT patients were more likely to accept randomization, stayed in treatment longer, and attended more sessions than those in the fluoxetine and PBO groups. Contrary to prediction, relapse/recurrence rates following the discontinuation of C-CT and fluoxetine did not differ.
Relapse risk was reduced by both C-CT and fluoxetine in an enriched randomization sampling only CT responders. The preventive effects of C-CT were not significantly more durable than those of fluoxetine after treatment was stopped, suggesting that some higher-risk patients may require alternate longer-term interventions.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00118404, NCT00183664, and NCT00218764.
改善复发性重度抑郁症病程的策略具有重要的公共卫生相关性。为了降低急性认知治疗(CT)后复发/复发的风险,治疗的延续阶段模型可能会改善结果。
在安慰剂对照随机试验中测试延续阶段 CT(C-CT)和氟西汀预防复发的疗效,并比较治疗停止后预防的耐久性。
一个连续的 3 阶段设计,包括急性阶段(所有患者接受 12 周的 CT);8 个月的实验阶段(风险较高的反应者随机分为 C-CT、氟西汀或安慰剂);以及 24 个月的纵向治疗后随访。
两所大学附属专业诊所。
共有 523 名复发性重度抑郁症患者开始接受急性 CT,其中 241 名高风险反应者随机分组,181 名随后进入随访。
对有较高复发风险的认知治疗反应者进行随机分组,接受 8 个月的 C-CT(n=86)、氟西汀(n=86)或安慰剂(n=69)。
使用 DSM-IV 标准和纵向间隔随访评估,盲法评估者对复发/复发率的生存分析。结果:正如预测的那样,在 8 个月内,C-CT 或氟西汀组的复发率明显低于安慰剂组。在 8 个月的治疗期间,C-CT 和氟西汀的复发/复发率几乎相同,尽管 C-CT 患者比氟西汀和安慰剂组更愿意接受随机分组,治疗时间更长,参加的治疗次数更多。与预测相反,C-CT 和氟西汀停药后的复发/复发率没有差异。
在仅对 CT 反应者进行富集随机抽样的情况下,C-CT 和氟西汀均可降低复发风险。在治疗停止后,C-CT 的预防效果与氟西汀没有显著的差异,这表明一些高危患者可能需要其他长期干预措施。
clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT00118404、NCT00183664 和 NCT00218764。