Program for Research in Nutrition and Health Disparities, Department of Social and Behavioral Health, School of Rural Public Health, Texas A&M Health Science Center, MS 1266, College Station, TX 77843-1266, United States.
Soc Sci Med. 2011 May;72(9):1454-62. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.03.015. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
Few studies have addressed the association of food insecurity with place of residence and perceptions of collective social functioning such as perceived social capital and perceived personal disparity. This study assessed the association between food insecurity and measures of perceived personal disparity and perceived social capital in a region of Central Texas, USA comprised of one urban and six rural counties. Food insecurity, perceived social capital, perceived personal disparity, and sociodemographic control measures were derived from the 2006 Brazos Valley Community Health Assessment on an analytic sample of 1803 adult participants (74% response rate). Robust multinomial regression models examined associations between food insecurity and perceived personal disparity, perceived social capital, education, age, residence in a poor or low-income household, minority group membership, and rural residence. A model was estimated for food insecurity (n = 1803, p < 0.0001). Residents with low social capital, higher levels of perceived personal disparity, rural residence, residence in a low-income or poor household, minority group membership, and lower levels of educational attainment were more likely to experience food insecurity. Rural residence (p = 0.021) was significant only for the comparison between those who never, and those who often experienced food insecurity, and findings for the stratified rural and urban samples were roughly equivalent to the combined sample. Individual level measures of collective social functioning are important correlates of food insecurity. In this study, both perceived personal disparity and perceived social capital play an important role, regardless of rural or urban residence.
很少有研究探讨粮食不安全与居住地点和对集体社会功能的看法(如感知社会资本和感知个人差距)之间的关系。本研究评估了美国得克萨斯州中部一个地区的粮食不安全状况与感知个人差距和感知社会资本措施之间的关系,该地区由一个城市和六个农村县组成。粮食不安全、感知社会资本、感知个人差距和社会人口统计学控制措施来自于 2006 年布拉索斯河谷社区健康评估,分析样本为 1803 名成年参与者(响应率为 74%)。稳健的多项分类回归模型检验了粮食不安全与感知个人差距、感知社会资本、教育、年龄、居住在贫困或低收入家庭、少数民族群体成员和农村居住之间的关联。为粮食不安全(n = 1803,p < 0.0001)建立了一个模型。社会资本水平低、感知个人差距较大、居住在农村、居住在低收入或贫困家庭、少数民族群体成员和教育程度较低的居民更有可能经历粮食不安全。农村居住(p = 0.021)仅对从未经历过粮食不安全和经常经历粮食不安全的人之间的比较具有统计学意义,农村和城市分层样本的结果与综合样本大致相当。集体社会功能的个体水平衡量标准是粮食不安全的重要相关因素。在这项研究中,感知个人差距和感知社会资本都起着重要作用,无论居住在农村还是城市。