• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

风险伤口分类及其聚己双胍抗菌治疗:一种面向实践的专家建议。

Classification of wounds at risk and their antimicrobial treatment with polihexanide: a practice-oriented expert recommendation.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Germany.

出版信息

Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2011;24(5):245-55. doi: 10.1159/000327210. Epub 2011 Apr 20.

DOI:10.1159/000327210
PMID:21508658
Abstract

Currently, there are no generally accepted definitions for wounds at risk of infection. In clinical practice, too many chronic wounds are regarded as being at risk of infection, and therefore many topical antimicrobials - in terms of frequency and duration of use - are applied to wounds. Based on expert discussion and current knowledge, a clinical assessment score was developed. The objective of this wounds at risk (W.A.R.) score is to allow decision-making on the indication for the use of antiseptics on the basis of polihexanide. The proposed clinical classification of W.A.R. shall facilitate the decision for wound antisepsis and allow an appropriate general treatment regimen with the focus on the prevention of wound infection. The W.A.R. score is based on a clinically oriented risk assessment using concrete patient circumstances. The indication for the use of antiseptics results from the addition of differently weighted risk causes, for which points are assigned. Antimicrobial treatment is justified in the case of 3 or more points.

摘要

目前,对于有感染风险的伤口还没有普遍接受的定义。在临床实践中,太多的慢性伤口被认为有感染的风险,因此许多局部抗菌药物——就使用频率和持续时间而言——被应用于伤口。基于专家讨论和现有知识,开发了一种临床评估评分。该风险伤口 (W.A.R.) 评分的目的是根据聚己双胍决定使用防腐剂的指征。拟议的风险伤口临床分类将有助于决定伤口消毒,并允许制定适当的一般治疗方案,重点是预防伤口感染。W.A.R. 评分基于使用具体患者情况的临床导向风险评估。使用防腐剂的指征源于附加不同权重的风险原因,并为此分配分数。如果有 3 个或更多的分数,则需要进行抗菌治疗。

相似文献

1
Classification of wounds at risk and their antimicrobial treatment with polihexanide: a practice-oriented expert recommendation.风险伤口分类及其聚己双胍抗菌治疗:一种面向实践的专家建议。
Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2011;24(5):245-55. doi: 10.1159/000327210. Epub 2011 Apr 20.
2
Clinical use of polihexanide on acute and chronic wounds for antisepsis and decontamination.聚己缩胍在急性和慢性伤口中的抗感染和去污的临床应用。
Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2010;23 Suppl:45-51. doi: 10.1159/000318267. Epub 2010 Sep 8.
3
Polihexanide for wound treatment--how it began.聚己双胍治疗创伤——它的起源。
Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2010;23 Suppl:4-6. doi: 10.1159/000318236. Epub 2010 Sep 8.
4
Consensus on Wound Antisepsis: Update 2018.伤口消毒共识:2018年更新
Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2018;31(1):28-58. doi: 10.1159/000481545. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
5
Polihexanide--perspectives on clinical wound antisepsis.聚己缩胍——临床伤口抗菌的前景。
Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2010;23 Suppl:1-3. doi: 10.1159/000318899. Epub 2010 Sep 8.
6
W.A.R. scores in patients with chronic leg ulcers: results of a multicentre study.慢性腿部溃疡患者的W.A.R.评分:一项多中心研究的结果
J Wound Care. 2014 Jan;23(1):5-6, 8, 10-2. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2014.23.1.5.
7
[Antisepsis of wounds: when and what?].[伤口的防腐:时机与方法?]
Rev Med Suisse. 2015 Apr 1;11(468):773-4, 776-8.
8
Wound-bed preparation: a vital step in the healing process.伤口床准备:愈合过程中的关键步骤。
Br J Nurs. 2017 Jun 22;26(12 Suppl):S24-S31. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2017.26.12.S24.
9
Review on the efficacy, safety and clinical applications of polihexanide, a modern wound antiseptic.聚己缩胍在现代伤口抗菌剂中的疗效、安全性和临床应用评价。
Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2010;23 Suppl:17-27. doi: 10.1159/000318264. Epub 2010 Sep 8.
10
Antibacterial agents for wounds and burns in the developing world. Report on a workshop.发展中国家伤口与烧伤的抗菌剂。研讨会报告
J Trop Med Hyg. 1992 Dec;95(6):397-403.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematics, diagnosis and treatment of wound infections in chronic wounds: A position paper from WundDACH.慢性伤口感染的系统分类、诊断与治疗:来自伤口与皮肤德国奥地利瑞士协会的立场文件
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2025 May;23(5):565-574. doi: 10.1111/ddg.15649. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
2
How effective is simple mechanical wound debridement in reducing bacterial colonisation? Results of a prospective clinical study.单纯机械性清创术在减少细菌定植方面的效果如何?一项前瞻性临床研究的结果。
Int Wound J. 2024 Apr;21(4):e14824. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14824.
3
Antiseptics and antimicrobials for the treatment and management of chronic wounds: a systematic review of clinical trials.
用于慢性伤口治疗与管理的防腐剂和抗菌剂:一项临床试验的系统评价
Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2022 Feb;39(1):141-151. doi: 10.5114/ada.2022.113807. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
4
Antiseptic Agents for Chronic Wounds: A Systematic Review.慢性伤口的抗菌剂:一项系统评价
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Mar 6;11(3):350. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11030350.
5
What COVID-19 taught us: New opportunities and pathways from telemedicine and novel antiseptics in wound healing.新冠疫情教会了我们什么:远程医疗和新型伤口愈合抗菌剂带来的新机遇和新途径。
Int Wound J. 2022 Aug;19(5):987-995. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13695. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
6
In Vitro Efficacy of Bacterial Cellulose Dressings Chemisorbed with Antiseptics against Biofilm Formed by Pathogens Isolated from Chronic Wounds.消毒剂化学吸附于细菌纤维素敷料对慢性伤口分离病原体生物膜的体外疗效。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Apr 13;22(8):3996. doi: 10.3390/ijms22083996.
7
Complicated acute haematogenous osteomyelitis with fatal outcome following a closed clavicle fracture-a case report and literature review.闭合性锁骨骨折后并发急性血源性骨髓炎并致死病例报告及文献复习
BJR Case Rep. 2016 May 1;2(2):20150389. doi: 10.1259/bjrcr.20150389. eCollection 2016.
8
Impact of cold atmospheric pressure argon plasma on antibiotic sensitivity of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains in vitro.冷大气压氩等离子体对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌株体外抗生素敏感性的影响。
GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2016 Aug 30;11:Doc17. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000277. eCollection 2016.
9
[Chronic wounds and bacteria. Clinical relevance, detection and therapy].[慢性伤口与细菌。临床相关性、检测与治疗]
Hautarzt. 2014 Jan;65(1):10-4. doi: 10.1007/s00105-013-2635-9.
10
Recommendations on negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and antimicrobial solutions - when, where and how to use: what does the evidence show?负压伤口治疗联合灌洗和抗菌溶液的推荐意见 - 何时、何地以及如何使用:证据显示了什么?
Int Wound J. 2013 Dec;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):32-42. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12183.