Suppr超能文献

用自报数据和行政数据绘制医生网络图谱。

Mapping physician networks with self-reported and administrative data.

机构信息

Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct;46(5):1592-609. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01262.x. Epub 2011 Apr 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether connections between physicians based on shared patients in administrative data correspond with professional relationships between physicians.

DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Survey of physicians affiliated with a large academic and community physicians' organization and 2006 Medicare data from a 100 percent sample of patients in the Boston Hospital referral region.

STUDY DESIGN/DATA COLLECTION: We administered a web-based survey to 616 physicians (response rate: 63 percent) about referral and advice relationships with physician colleagues. Relationships measured by this questionnaire were compared with relationships assessed by patient sharing, measured using 2006 Medicare data. Each physician was presented with an individualized roster of physicians' names with whom they did and did not share patients based on the Medicare data.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The probability of two physicians having a recognized professional relationship increased with the number of Medicare patients shared, with up to 82 percent of relationships recognized with nine shared patients, overall representing a diagnostic test with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.73 (95 percent CI: 0.70-0.75). Primary care physicians were more likely to recognize relationships than medical or surgical specialists (p<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient sharing identified using administrative data is an informative "diagnostic test" for predicting the existence of relationships between physicians. This finding validates a method that can be used for future research to map networks of physicians.

摘要

目的

评估基于管理数据中共享患者的医生之间的联系是否与医生之间的专业关系相符。

数据来源/研究设置:对隶属于一个大型学术和社区医生组织的医生进行的调查,以及来自波士顿医院转诊区域的 100%患者的 2006 年医疗保险数据。

研究设计/数据收集:我们向 616 名医生(回应率:63%)进行了一项关于与同事转诊和咨询关系的网络调查。通过问卷调查来衡量关系,与使用 2006 年医疗保险数据衡量的患者共享情况进行比较。根据医疗保险数据,每位医生都收到了一份个性化的医生名单,列出了他们与谁共享以及不与谁共享患者。

主要发现

随着共享医疗保险患者数量的增加,两名医生具有公认的专业关系的可能性增加,总共达到 82%的关系可以通过共享 9 名患者来识别,总体而言,这代表了一项诊断测试,其受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.73(95%置信区间:0.70-0.75)。初级保健医生比内科医生或外科医生更有可能识别出这种关系(p<.001)。

结论

使用管理数据识别的患者共享是预测医生之间关系存在的一种信息丰富的“诊断测试”。这一发现验证了一种可用于未来研究以绘制医生网络的方法。

相似文献

1
Mapping physician networks with self-reported and administrative data.
Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct;46(5):1592-609. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01262.x. Epub 2011 Apr 26.
2
Reasons for choice of referral physician among primary care and specialist physicians.
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 May;27(5):506-12. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1861-z. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
3
Variation in patient-sharing networks of physicians across the United States.
JAMA. 2012 Jul 18;308(3):265-73. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.7615.
4
The formation of physician patient sharing networks in medicare: Exploring the effect of hospital affiliation.
Health Econ. 2019 Dec;28(12):1435-1448. doi: 10.1002/hec.3936. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
5
Patient-Sharing Networks of Physicians and Health Care Utilization and Spending Among Medicare Beneficiaries.
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jan 1;178(1):66-73. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.5034.
6
Association between primary care physicians' practice models and referral rates to specialists: A sex-based cross-sectional study.
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 28;20(4):e0322175. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322175. eCollection 2025.
7
Medical Practice Consolidation and Physician Shared Patient Network Size, Strength, and Stability.
Med Care. 2019 Sep;57(9):680-687. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001168.
8
Prevalence and patterns of physician referral to clergy and pastoral care providers.
Arch Fam Med. 1998 Nov-Dec;7(6):548-53. doi: 10.1001/archfami.7.6.548.
9
Physician referral rates: style without much substance?
Med Care. 2000 Aug;38(8):836-46. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200008000-00007.
10
Using administrative data to identify naturally occurring networks of physicians.
Med Care. 2013 Aug;51(8):715-21. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182977991.

引用本文的文献

3
Identifying opioid agonist treatment prescriber networks from health administrative data: A validation study.
PLoS One. 2025 May 16;20(5):e0322064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322064. eCollection 2025.
4
A Scoping Review of Multilevel Patient-Sharing Network Measures in Health Services Research.
Med Care Res Rev. 2025 Jun;82(3):203-224. doi: 10.1177/10775587241304140. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
5
Temporal and Atemporal Provider Network Analysis in a Breast Cancer Cohort from an Academic Medical Center (USA).
Informatics (MDPI). 2018 Sep;5(3). doi: 10.3390/informatics5030034. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
6
Methodology for supervised optimization of the construction of physician shared-patient networks.
Stat Methods Med Res. 2025 May;34(5):938-955. doi: 10.1177/09622802241313281. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
7
Analysis of the patient-sharing network in hypertension management: a retrospective study in China.
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 13;15(3):e093684. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093684.

本文引用的文献

1
Extracting the multiscale backbone of complex weighted networks.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Apr 21;106(16):6483-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808904106. Epub 2009 Apr 8.
2
Factors affecting influential discussions among physicians: a social network analysis of a primary care practice.
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Jun;22(6):794-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0190-8. Epub 2007 Apr 3.
3
Contribution of primary care to health systems and health.
Milbank Q. 2005;83(3):457-502. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00409.x.
5
Physicians' experiences and beliefs regarding informal consultation.
JAMA. 1998 Sep 9;280(10):900-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.10.900.
6
Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals.
J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 Oct;50(10):1129-36. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00126-1.
7
The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Radiology. 1982 Apr;143(1):29-36. doi: 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747.
8
Physician referrals and the medical market place.
Med Care. 1991 Oct;29(10):1017-27. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199110000-00007.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验