Suppr超能文献

在不同的力量清洁动作中,峰值地面反作用力和力量发展速率的比较。

Comparisons of peak ground reaction force and rate of force development during variations of the power clean.

机构信息

Directorate of Sport, Exercise and Physiotherapy, University of Salford, Salford, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2011 May;25(5):1235-9. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d6dc0d.

Abstract

The aim of this investigation was to determine the differences in vertical ground reaction forces and rate of force development (RFD) during variations of the power clean. Elite rugby league players (n = 11; age 21 ± 1.63 years; height 181.56 ± 2.61 cm; body mass 93.65 ± 6.84 kg) performed 1 set of 3 repetitions of the power clean, hang-power clean, midthigh power clean, or midthigh clean pull, using 60% of 1-repetition maximum power clean, in a randomized order, while standing on a force platform. Differences in peak vertical ground reaction forces (F(z)) and instantaneous RFD between lifts were analyzed via 1-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni post hoc analysis. Statistical analysis revealed a significantly (p < 0.001) greater peak F(z) during the midthigh power clean (2,801.7 ± 195.4 N) and the midthigh clean pull (2,880.2 ± 236.2 N) compared to both the power clean (2,306.24 ± 240.47 N) and the hang-power clean (2,442.9 ± 293.2 N). The midthigh power clean (14,655.8 ± 4,535.1 N·s⁻¹) and the midthigh clean pull (15,320.6 ± 3,533.3 N·s⁻¹) also demonstrated significantly (p < 0.001) greater instantaneous RFD when compared to both the power clean (8,839.7 ± 2,940.4 N·s⁻¹) and the hang-power clean (9,768.9 ± 4,012.4 N·s⁻¹). From the findings of this study, when training to maximize peak F(z) and RFD the midthigh power clean and midthigh clean pull appear to be the most advantageous variations of the power clean to perform.

摘要

本研究旨在确定不同形式的高翻动作中垂直地面反作用力(Fz)和力发展速率(RFD)的差异。11 名精英英式橄榄球运动员(年龄 21 ± 1.63 岁;身高 181.56 ± 2.61cm;体重 93.65 ± 6.84kg)采用 60%1 次最大重复高翻力量,分别完成 3 次重复的高翻、悬垂高翻、大腿高翻和大腿高翻拉,以随机顺序在力量平台上进行。通过单向方差分析和 Bonferroni 事后检验分析,对不同举重动作的峰值垂直地面反作用力(Fz)和瞬时 RFD 差异进行分析。统计分析显示,大腿高翻(2801.7 ± 195.4N)和大腿高翻拉(2880.2 ± 236.2N)的峰值 Fz 显著高于高翻(2306.24 ± 240.47N)和悬垂高翻(2442.9 ± 293.2N)(p < 0.001)。大腿高翻(14655.8 ± 4535.1N·s⁻¹)和大腿高翻拉(15320.6 ± 3533.3N·s⁻¹)的瞬时 RFD 也显著高于高翻(8839.7 ± 2940.4N·s⁻¹)和悬垂高翻(9768.9 ± 4012.4N·s⁻¹)(p < 0.001)。从本研究的结果来看,当训练以最大化峰值 Fz 和 RFD 时,大腿高翻和大腿高翻拉似乎是进行高翻最有利的变体。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验