• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解辐射诱导的细胞周期检查点的局限性。

Understanding the limitations of radiation-induced cell cycle checkpoints.

机构信息

Darmstadt University of Technology, Radiation Biology and DNA Repair, Darmstadt, Germany.

出版信息

Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2011 Aug;46(4):271-83. doi: 10.3109/10409238.2011.575764. Epub 2011 Apr 27.

DOI:10.3109/10409238.2011.575764
PMID:21524151
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3171706/
Abstract

The DNA damage response pathways involve processes of double-strand break (DSB) repair and cell cycle checkpoint control to prevent or limit entry into S phase or mitosis in the presence of unrepaired damage. Checkpoints can function to permanently remove damaged cells from the actively proliferating population but can also halt the cell cycle temporarily to provide time for the repair of DSBs. Although efficient in their ability to limit genomic instability, checkpoints are not foolproof but carry inherent limitations. Recent work has demonstrated that the G1/S checkpoint is slowly activated and allows cells to enter S phase in the presence of unrepaired DSBs for about 4-6 h post irradiation. During this time, only a slowing but not abolition of S-phase entry is observed. The G2/M checkpoint, in contrast, is quickly activated but only responds to a level of 10-20 DSBs such that cells with a low number of DSBs do not initiate the checkpoint or terminate arrest before repair is complete. Here, we discuss the limitations of these checkpoints in the context of the current knowledge of the factors involved. We suggest that the time needed to fully activate G1/S arrest reflects the existence of a restriction point in G1-phase progression. This point has previously been defined as the point when mitogen starvation fails to prevent cells from entering S phase. However, cells that passed the restriction point can respond to DSBs, albeit with reduced efficiency.

摘要

DNA 损伤反应途径涉及双链断裂 (DSB) 修复和细胞周期检查点控制过程,以防止或限制在未修复损伤存在的情况下进入 S 期或有丝分裂期。检查点可以永久地将受损细胞从活跃增殖的群体中去除,但也可以暂时停止细胞周期,为 DSB 的修复提供时间。尽管在限制基因组不稳定性方面非常有效,但检查点并非万无一失,而是存在固有局限性。最近的工作表明,G1/S 检查点的激活速度较慢,允许细胞在照射后约 4-6 小时内未修复的 DSB 存在的情况下进入 S 期。在此期间,只观察到 S 期进入速度减慢,但不会完全停止。相比之下,G2/M 检查点迅速激活,但仅对 10-20 个 DSB 水平做出反应,因此,只有少数 DSB 的细胞不会启动检查点或在修复完成之前终止停滞。在这里,我们根据涉及的因素的现有知识讨论了这些检查点的局限性。我们认为,完全激活 G1/S 停滞所需的时间反映了 G1 期进展中存在限制点。该点以前被定义为丝裂原饥饿阻止细胞进入 S 期的点。然而,已经通过限制点的细胞可以对 DSB 做出反应,尽管效率降低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3242/3171706/7e44a4cc9eb6/bbmg46-271-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3242/3171706/314021f88671/bbmg46-271-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3242/3171706/dcb3066028d7/bbmg46-271-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3242/3171706/79d522d42175/bbmg46-271-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3242/3171706/7e44a4cc9eb6/bbmg46-271-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3242/3171706/314021f88671/bbmg46-271-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3242/3171706/dcb3066028d7/bbmg46-271-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3242/3171706/79d522d42175/bbmg46-271-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3242/3171706/7e44a4cc9eb6/bbmg46-271-f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Understanding the limitations of radiation-induced cell cycle checkpoints.理解辐射诱导的细胞周期检查点的局限性。
Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2011 Aug;46(4):271-83. doi: 10.3109/10409238.2011.575764. Epub 2011 Apr 27.
2
Cell cycle checkpoints and DNA repair preserve the stability of the human genome.细胞周期检查点和DNA修复维持着人类基因组的稳定性。
Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1995 Mar;14(1):31-41. doi: 10.1007/BF00690209.
3
Break dosage, cell cycle stage and DNA replication influence DNA double strand break response.断裂剂量、细胞周期阶段和DNA复制会影响DNA双链断裂反应。
EMBO J. 2008 Jul 9;27(13):1875-85. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2008.111. Epub 2008 May 29.
4
[Cell cycle regulation after exposure to ionizing radiation].[暴露于电离辐射后的细胞周期调控]
Bull Cancer. 1999 Apr;86(4):345-57.
5
Association of G1/S-phase and late S-phase checkpoints with regulation of cyclin-dependent kinases in Chinese hamster ovary cells.中国仓鼠卵巢细胞中G1/S期和S期晚期检查点与细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶调控的关联
Radiat Res. 1997 Sep;148(3):260-71.
6
Cell cycle-dependent resolution of DNA double-strand breaks.DNA双链断裂的细胞周期依赖性修复
Oncotarget. 2016 Jan 26;7(4):4949-60. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6644.
7
Ionizing radiation and genetic risks. XVII. Formation mechanisms underlying naturally occurring DNA deletions in the human genome and their potential relevance for bridging the gap between induced DNA double-strand breaks and deletions in irradiated germ cells.电离辐射与遗传风险。十七、人类基因组中自然发生的 DNA 缺失的形成机制及其在连接诱导的 DNA 双链断裂与照射生殖细胞中的缺失之间的潜在相关性。
Mutat Res. 2013 Oct-Dec;753(2):114-130. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2013.07.003. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
8
Double-strand break repair-adox: Restoration of suppressed double-strand break repair during mitosis induces genomic instability.双链断裂修复-adoX:有丝分裂期间受抑制的双链断裂修复的恢复导致基因组不稳定性。
Cancer Sci. 2014 Dec;105(12):1519-25. doi: 10.1111/cas.12551. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
9
F9 embryonal carcinoma cells fail to stop at G1/S boundary of the cell cycle after gamma-irradiation due to p21WAF1/CIP1 degradation.由于p21WAF1/CIP1降解,F9胚胎癌细胞在γ射线照射后无法在细胞周期的G1/S边界处停止。
Oncogene. 2000 Aug 10;19(34):3858-65. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203736.
10
The effects of G2-phase enrichment and checkpoint abrogation on low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity.G2期富集和检查点消除对低剂量超放射敏感性的影响。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Aug 1;77(5):1509-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.01.028.

引用本文的文献

1
Cytotoxicity of Pb-labeled anti-PTK7 antibody in 2D adherent and 3D multicellular bladder cancer models.铅标记的抗PTK7抗体在二维贴壁和三维多细胞膀胱癌模型中的细胞毒性
EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem. 2025 Aug 30;10(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s41181-025-00382-3.
2
Modeling the effects of radiation on the bone tumor microenvironment: opportunities for exploring combination therapies in microphysiologic systems.模拟辐射对骨肿瘤微环境的影响:在微生理系统中探索联合疗法的机遇
Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2025 Aug 14;30(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s11658-025-00774-y.
3
Historical view of the effects of radiation on cancer cells.

本文引用的文献

1
53BP1 nuclear bodies form around DNA lesions generated by mitotic transmission of chromosomes under replication stress.53BP1 核体围绕在复制压力下有丝分裂传递染色体产生的 DNA 损伤处形成。
Nat Cell Biol. 2011 Mar;13(3):243-53. doi: 10.1038/ncb2201. Epub 2011 Feb 13.
2
The ATR barrier to replication-born DNA damage.ATR 对复制起始 DNA 损伤的阻滞作用。
DNA Repair (Amst). 2010 Dec 10;9(12):1249-55. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.09.012. Epub 2010 Oct 30.
3
SnapShot: Homologous recombination in DNA double-strand break repair.简讯:DNA双链断裂修复中的同源重组
辐射对癌细胞影响的历史观点。
Oncol Rev. 2025 Apr 30;19:1527742. doi: 10.3389/or.2025.1527742. eCollection 2025.
4
The temporal response of a glioma cell population to irradiation: modelling the effect of dose and cell density.胶质瘤细胞群体对辐射的时间响应:模拟剂量和细胞密度的影响。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Apr 30;12(4):241917. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241917. eCollection 2025 Apr.
5
The art of war: using genetic insights to understand and harness radiation sensitivity in hematologic malignancies.战争的艺术:利用遗传学见解来理解和利用血液系统恶性肿瘤中的辐射敏感性。
Front Oncol. 2025 Mar 21;14:1478078. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1478078. eCollection 2024.
6
Identification and Biological Evaluation of a Novel CLK4 Inhibitor Targeting Alternative Splicing in Pancreatic Cancer Using Structure-Based Virtual Screening.基于结构的虚拟筛选鉴定新型CLK4抑制剂及其对胰腺癌中可变剪接的生物学评价
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2025 May;12(19):e2416323. doi: 10.1002/advs.202416323. Epub 2025 Mar 24.
7
DNA damage checkpoints balance a tradeoff between diploid- and polyploid-derived arrest failures.DNA损伤检查点平衡了二倍体和多倍体衍生的细胞周期停滞失败之间的权衡。
bioRxiv. 2025 Feb 16:2025.02.14.638318. doi: 10.1101/2025.02.14.638318.
8
Targeting USP1 Potentiates Radiation-Induced Type I IFN-Dependent Antitumor Immunity by Enhancing Oligo-Ubiquitinated SAR1A-Mediated STING Trafficking and Activation.靶向USP1通过增强寡聚泛素化的SAR1A介导的STING转运和激活来增强辐射诱导的I型干扰素依赖性抗肿瘤免疫。
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2025 Apr;12(15):e2412687. doi: 10.1002/advs.202412687. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
9
TRIM-endous functional network of tripartite motif 29 (TRIM29) in cancer progression and beyond.肿瘤进展及其他方面中具有巨大功能的三重基序29(TRIM29)网络。
Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2024 Dec 7;44(1):16. doi: 10.1007/s10555-024-10226-2.
10
Targeting the DNA damage response in cancer.靶向癌症中的DNA损伤反应。
MedComm (2020). 2024 Oct 31;5(11):e788. doi: 10.1002/mco2.788. eCollection 2024 Nov.
Cell. 2010 Aug 20;142(4):646, 646.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.08.006.
4
p53-dependent G(1) arrest in 1st or 2nd cell cycle may protect human cancer cells from cell death after treatment with ionizing radiation and Chk1 inhibitors.p53 依赖性 G(1)期阻滞在第一或第二细胞周期可能保护人类癌细胞免受电离辐射和 Chk1 抑制剂治疗后的细胞死亡。
Cell Prolif. 2010 Aug;43(4):365-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2010.00685.x.
5
The limitations of the G1-S checkpoint.G1-S 检验点的局限性。
Cancer Res. 2010 Jun 1;70(11):4412-21. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3198. Epub 2010 May 11.
6
Role of ATM and the damage response mediator proteins 53BP1 and MDC1 in the maintenance of G(2)/M checkpoint arrest.ATM 及损伤反应调节蛋白 53BP1 和 MDC1 在维持 G(2)/M 检验点阻滞中的作用。
Mol Cell Biol. 2010 Jul;30(13):3371-83. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01644-09. Epub 2010 Apr 26.
7
GEN1/Yen1 and the SLX4 complex: Solutions to the problem of Holliday junction resolution.GEN1/Yen1 和 SLX4 复合物:解决 Holliday 连接点解决问题的方法。
Genes Dev. 2010 Mar 15;24(6):521-36. doi: 10.1101/gad.1903510. Epub 2010 Mar 4.
8
A mitotic phosphorylation feedback network connects Cdk1, Plk1, 53BP1, and Chk2 to inactivate the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint.一个有丝分裂磷酸化反馈网络将 Cdk1、Plk1、53BP1 和 Chk2 连接起来,使 G(2)/M DNA 损伤检查点失活。
PLoS Biol. 2010 Jan 26;8(1):e1000287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000287.
9
Dealing with DNA damage: relationships between checkpoint and repair pathways.应对 DNA 损伤:检测点与修复途径之间的关系。
Mutat Res. 2010 Apr-Jun;704(1-3):2-11. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2009.12.001. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
10
Control of the G2/M checkpoints after exposure to low doses of ionising radiation: implications for hyper-radiosensitivity.低剂量电离辐射暴露后 G2/M 检验点的控制:超放射敏感性的意义。
DNA Repair (Amst). 2010 Jan 2;9(1):48-57. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.10.006. Epub 2009 Nov 18.