Gastroenterology Unit, Hellenic Anticancer Institute Saint Savvas Hospital of Athens, 171 Alexandras Avenue, GR 11522, Greece.
World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Apr 21;17(15):1989-95. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i15.1989.
To investigate the technical success and clinical complication rate of a cannulated pancreatic duct with guidewire for biliary access.
During a five-year study period, a total of 2843 patients were included in this retrospective analysis. Initial biliary cannulation method consisted of single-guidewire technique (SGT) for up to 5 attempts, followed by double-guidewire technique (DGT) when repeated unintentional pancreatic duct cannulation had taken place. Pre-cut papillotomy technique was reserved for when DGT had failed or no pancreatic duct cannulation had been previously achieved. Main outcome measurements were defined as biliary cannulation success and post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) complication rate.
SGT (92.3% success rate) was characterized by statistically significant enhanced patient outcome compared to either the DGT (43.8%, P < 0.001), pre-cut failed DGT (73%, P < 0.001) or pre-cut as first step method (80.6%, P = 0.002). Pre-cut as first step method offered a statistically significantly more favorable outcome compared to the DGT (P < 0.001). The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis did not differ in a statistically significant manner between either method (SGT: 5.3%, DGT: 6.1%, Pre-cut failed DGT: 7.9%, Pre-cut as first step: 7.5%) or with patients' gender.
Although DGT success rate proved not to be superior to SGT or pre-cut papillotomy, it is considered highly satisfactory in terms of safety in order to avoid the risk of a pre-cut when biliary therapy is necessary in difficult-to-cannulate cases.
研究导丝引导下经皮胰管置管术行胆管入路的技术成功率和临床并发症发生率。
在一项为期五年的研究期间,共对 2843 例患者进行了回顾性分析。初始胆管插管方法为单导丝技术(SGT),最多尝试 5 次,随后在反复意外胰管插管时采用双导丝技术(DGT)。当 DGT 失败或以前未进行胰管插管时,保留预切开乳头切开术。主要观察指标定义为胆管插管成功率和内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)后并发症发生率。
SGT(92.3%的成功率)与 DGT(43.8%,P<0.001)、预切开失败的 DGT(73%,P<0.001)或预切开作为第一步的方法(80.6%,P=0.002)相比,患者结局显著改善。预切开作为第一步的方法与 DGT 相比,具有统计学上更有利的结果(P<0.001)。ERCP 后胰腺炎的发生率在统计学上没有明显差异,无论采用哪种方法(SGT:5.3%,DGT:6.1%,预切开失败的 DGT:7.9%,预切开作为第一步:7.5%)或患者性别。
尽管 DGT 的成功率并不优于 SGT 或预切开乳头切开术,但考虑到安全方面的优势,在难以插管的情况下需要胆管治疗时,避免预切开的风险,DGT 被认为是非常令人满意的。