Suppr超能文献

胰管导丝在单次治疗性 ERCP 中的胆管插管中的应用。

Pancreatic duct guidewire placement for biliary cannulation in a single-session therapeutic ERCP.

机构信息

Gastroenterology Unit, Hellenic Anticancer Institute Saint Savvas Hospital of Athens, 171 Alexandras Avenue, GR 11522, Greece.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Apr 21;17(15):1989-95. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i15.1989.

Abstract

AIM

To investigate the technical success and clinical complication rate of a cannulated pancreatic duct with guidewire for biliary access.

METHODS

During a five-year study period, a total of 2843 patients were included in this retrospective analysis. Initial biliary cannulation method consisted of single-guidewire technique (SGT) for up to 5 attempts, followed by double-guidewire technique (DGT) when repeated unintentional pancreatic duct cannulation had taken place. Pre-cut papillotomy technique was reserved for when DGT had failed or no pancreatic duct cannulation had been previously achieved. Main outcome measurements were defined as biliary cannulation success and post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) complication rate.

RESULTS

SGT (92.3% success rate) was characterized by statistically significant enhanced patient outcome compared to either the DGT (43.8%, P < 0.001), pre-cut failed DGT (73%, P < 0.001) or pre-cut as first step method (80.6%, P = 0.002). Pre-cut as first step method offered a statistically significantly more favorable outcome compared to the DGT (P < 0.001). The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis did not differ in a statistically significant manner between either method (SGT: 5.3%, DGT: 6.1%, Pre-cut failed DGT: 7.9%, Pre-cut as first step: 7.5%) or with patients' gender.

CONCLUSION

Although DGT success rate proved not to be superior to SGT or pre-cut papillotomy, it is considered highly satisfactory in terms of safety in order to avoid the risk of a pre-cut when biliary therapy is necessary in difficult-to-cannulate cases.

摘要

目的

研究导丝引导下经皮胰管置管术行胆管入路的技术成功率和临床并发症发生率。

方法

在一项为期五年的研究期间,共对 2843 例患者进行了回顾性分析。初始胆管插管方法为单导丝技术(SGT),最多尝试 5 次,随后在反复意外胰管插管时采用双导丝技术(DGT)。当 DGT 失败或以前未进行胰管插管时,保留预切开乳头切开术。主要观察指标定义为胆管插管成功率和内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)后并发症发生率。

结果

SGT(92.3%的成功率)与 DGT(43.8%,P<0.001)、预切开失败的 DGT(73%,P<0.001)或预切开作为第一步的方法(80.6%,P=0.002)相比,患者结局显著改善。预切开作为第一步的方法与 DGT 相比,具有统计学上更有利的结果(P<0.001)。ERCP 后胰腺炎的发生率在统计学上没有明显差异,无论采用哪种方法(SGT:5.3%,DGT:6.1%,预切开失败的 DGT:7.9%,预切开作为第一步:7.5%)或患者性别。

结论

尽管 DGT 的成功率并不优于 SGT 或预切开乳头切开术,但考虑到安全方面的优势,在难以插管的情况下需要胆管治疗时,避免预切开的风险,DGT 被认为是非常令人满意的。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Pre-cut sphincterotomy: does the timing matter?预先切开括约肌切开术:时机重要吗?
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 1):480-3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.11.030.
9
ERCP cannulation: a review of reported techniques.内镜逆行胰胆管造影插管术:已报道技术的综述
Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Jan;61(1):112-25. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)02463-0.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验