• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

香烟税与呼吸道癌症:面板协整分析的新证据

Cigarette taxes and respiratory cancers: new evidence from panel co-integration analysis.

作者信息

Liu Echu, Yu Wei-Choun, Hsieh Hsin-Ling

机构信息

School of Allied Health, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, Carbondale, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

J Health Care Finance. 2011 Spring;37(3):62-71.

PMID:21528834
Abstract

Using a set of state-level longitudinal data from 1954 through 2005, this study investigates the "long-run equilibrium" relationship between cigarette excise taxes and the mortality rates of respiratory cancers in the United States. Statistical tests show that both cigarette excise taxes in real terms and mortality rates from respiratory cancers contain unit roots and are co-integrated. Estimates of co-integrating vectors indicated that a 10 percent increase in real cigarette excise tax rate leads to a 2.5 percent reduction in respiratory cancer mortality rate, implying a decline of 3,922 deaths per year, on a national level in the long run. These effects are statistically significant at the one percent level. Moreover, estimates of co-integrating vectors show that higher cigarette excise tax rates lead to lower mortality rates in most states; however, this relationship does not hold for Alaska, Florida, Hawaii, and Texas.

摘要

本研究利用一组1954年至2005年的州级纵向数据,调查了美国香烟消费税与呼吸道癌症死亡率之间的“长期均衡”关系。统计检验表明,实际香烟消费税和呼吸道癌症死亡率都含有单位根且存在协整关系。协整向量估计表明,实际香烟消费税税率每提高10%,呼吸道癌症死亡率就会降低2.5%,这意味着从长期来看,在全国范围内每年死亡人数会减少3922人。这些影响在1%的水平上具有统计学意义。此外,协整向量估计显示,在大多数州,较高的香烟消费税税率会导致较低的死亡率;然而,阿拉斯加、佛罗里达、夏威夷和得克萨斯州并不存在这种关系。

相似文献

1
Cigarette taxes and respiratory cancers: new evidence from panel co-integration analysis.香烟税与呼吸道癌症:面板协整分析的新证据
J Health Care Finance. 2011 Spring;37(3):62-71.
2
State cigarette excise taxes - United States, 2009.州香烟消费税-美国,2009 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010 Apr 9;59(13):385-8.
3
Providers issue brief: tobacco: excise taxes: year end report-2003.提供者发布简报:烟草:消费税:2003年年终报告
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2003 Dec 31:1-7.
4
Does increasing cigarette excise tax improve people's health? The cases of heart attacks and stroke.
J Health Care Finance. 2008 Spring;34(3):91-109.
5
Federal and state cigarette excise taxes - United States, 1995-2009.1995 - 2009年美国联邦和州香烟消费税
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009 May 22;58(19):524-7.
6
State cigarette excise taxes - United States, 2010-2011.各州香烟消费税 - 美国,2010-2011 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012 Mar 30;61(12):201-4.
7
A simulation model to predict the fiscal and public health impact of a change in cigarette excise taxes.一种用于预测香烟消费税变化对财政和公共卫生影响的仿真模型。
Tob Control. 2010 Feb;19(1):31-6. doi: 10.1136/tc.2008.028779. Epub 2009 Oct 21.
8
Public health: tobacco taxes and Internet sales--2005. End of Year Issue Brief.公共卫生:烟草税与网络销售——2005年。年终问题简报。
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2005 Dec 31:1-7.
9
Cigarette tax increase and media campaign cost of reducing smoking-related deaths.提高香烟税以及开展媒体宣传活动以降低与吸烟相关的死亡人数的成本。
Am J Prev Med. 2005 Jul;29(1):19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.03.004.
10
Limiting youth access to tobacco: comparing the long-term health impacts of increasing cigarette excise taxes and raising the legal smoking age to 21 in the United States.限制青少年获取烟草:比较提高香烟消费税和将美国合法吸烟年龄提高到21岁对长期健康的影响
Health Policy. 2007 Mar;80(3):378-91. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.04.001. Epub 2006 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
State Cigarette Taxes and Lung Cancer Incidence, United States, 1970-2019.1970 - 2019年美国各州卷烟税与肺癌发病率
Public Health Rep. 2025 Jul 15:333549251341244. doi: 10.1177/00333549251341244.
2
State cigarette excise tax, secondhand smoke exposure, and periodontitis in US nonsmokers.美国不吸烟人群中的州香烟消费税、二手烟暴露与牙周炎。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Apr;103(4):740-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300579. Epub 2012 Sep 20.