• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高香烟税以及开展媒体宣传活动以降低与吸烟相关的死亡人数的成本。

Cigarette tax increase and media campaign cost of reducing smoking-related deaths.

作者信息

Fishman Paul A, Ebel Beth E, Garrison Michelle M, Christakis Dimitri A, Wiehe Sarah E, Rivara Frederick P

机构信息

Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, Seattle, Washington 98101, USA.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2005 Jul;29(1):19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.03.004.

DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2005.03.004
PMID:15958247
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tobacco use results in 500,000 premature deaths annually. Most smokers begin using tobacco before age 21, so the greatest impact on preventing smoking-related mortality is likely to come from campaigns targeting youths. This study estimates the cost-effectiveness of an anti-smoking media campaign and dollar 1 per pack increase in cigarette taxes on the lifetime decrease in smoking-attributable mortality among the cohort of all 18-year-olds in the United States during the year 2000.

METHODS

Cost-effectiveness analysis conducted from a societal perspective.

RESULTS

The combined effects of a media campaign and dollar 1 per pack tax increase will result in a societal savings of between dollar 590,000 per life-year saved, at a 3% discount rate and dollar 1.4 million per life year saved, at a 7% discount rate.

CONCLUSIONS

A media campaign and $1 per pack cigarette tax increase will reduce overall smoking prevalence, significantly decrease smoking-attributable mortality, and decrease net societal costs.

摘要

背景

烟草使用每年导致50万人过早死亡。大多数吸烟者在21岁之前开始使用烟草,因此预防与吸烟相关的死亡率的最大影响可能来自针对年轻人的运动。本研究估计了反吸烟媒体运动以及每包香烟税提高1美元对2000年美国所有18岁人群中吸烟所致死亡率终生降低的成本效益。

方法

从社会角度进行成本效益分析。

结果

媒体运动和每包税提高1美元的综合效果将带来社会节省,按3%的贴现率计算,每挽救一个生命年节省59万美元,按7%的贴现率计算,每挽救一个生命年节省140万美元。

结论

媒体运动和每包香烟税提高1美元将降低总体吸烟率,显著降低吸烟所致死亡率,并降低社会净成本。

相似文献

1
Cigarette tax increase and media campaign cost of reducing smoking-related deaths.提高香烟税以及开展媒体宣传活动以降低与吸烟相关的死亡人数的成本。
Am J Prev Med. 2005 Jul;29(1):19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.03.004.
2
Prevention of smoking-related deaths in the United States.美国吸烟相关死亡的预防
Am J Prev Med. 2004 Aug;27(2):118-25. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.04.014.
3
Increasing taxes to reduce smoking prevalence and smoking attributable mortality in Taiwan: results from a tobacco policy simulation model.提高税收以降低台湾地区的吸烟率和吸烟所致死亡率:烟草政策模拟模型的结果
Tob Control. 2005 Jun;14 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i45-50. doi: 10.1136/tc.2003.005660.
4
Increasing taxes as a strategy to reduce cigarette use and deaths: results of a simulation model.增加税收作为减少香烟使用和死亡的策略:模拟模型的结果
Prev Med. 2000 Sep;31(3):279-86. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0696.
5
Public opinion regarding earmarked cigarette tax in Taiwan.台湾地区民众对特定用途香烟税的看法。
BMC Public Health. 2003 Dec 24;3:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-3-42.
6
What is the potential cost-effectiveness of enforcing a prohibition on the sale of tobacco to minors?对向未成年人销售烟草实施禁令的潜在成本效益如何?
Prev Med. 2001 Feb;32(2):168-74. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0795.
7
Limiting youth access to tobacco: comparing the long-term health impacts of increasing cigarette excise taxes and raising the legal smoking age to 21 in the United States.限制青少年获取烟草:比较提高香烟消费税和将美国合法吸烟年龄提高到21岁对长期健康的影响
Health Policy. 2007 Mar;80(3):378-91. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.04.001. Epub 2006 May 12.
8
Increasing tobacco taxes: a cheap tool to increase public health.提高烟草税:增进公众健康的低成本手段。
Health Policy. 2007 Jul;82(2):142-52. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.09.004. Epub 2006 Oct 16.
9
Cigarette smoking before and after an excise tax increase and an antismoking campaign--Massachusetts, 1990-1996.消费税上调与反吸烟运动前后的吸烟情况——马萨诸塞州,1990 - 1996年
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1996 Nov 8;45(44):966-70.
10
State cigarette excise taxes - United States, 2009.州香烟消费税-美国,2009 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010 Apr 9;59(13):385-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of tobacco control policies and programmes targeting adolescents: a systematic review.针对青少年的烟草控制政策和项目的成本效益:系统评价。
Eur J Public Health. 2018 Feb 1;28(1):39-43. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx215.
2
The relation between cigarette taxes and older adult smoking in Zhejiang and Gansu: what happened following the 2009 Chinese Tax adjustments?2009 年中国税收调整后,浙江和甘肃的香烟税与老年吸烟人群的关系:发生了什么?
Environ Health Prev Med. 2017 Apr 4;22(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12199-017-0640-9.
3
Associations between tobacco control mass media campaign expenditure and smoking prevalence and quitting in England: a time series analysis.
烟草控制大众媒体宣传支出与英格兰吸烟率和戒烟率的关系:时间序列分析。
Tob Control. 2018 Jul;27(4):455-462. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053662. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
4
Economic evaluations of tobacco control mass media campaigns: a systematic review.烟草控制大众媒体宣传活动的经济评估:一项系统综述
Tob Control. 2015 Jul;24(4):320-7. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051579. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
5
Promotion of healthy eating through public policy: a controlled experiment.通过公共政策促进健康饮食:一项对照实验。
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Jul;45(1):49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.02.023.
6
Impact of Broadened Coverage of Smoking Cessation Treatments on Cardiovascular Disease.戒烟治疗覆盖范围扩大对心血管疾病的影响。
Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2012 Dec 1;6(6):542-548. doi: 10.1007/s12170-012-0275-8.
7
A review of economic evaluations of tobacco control programs.烟草控制项目的经济评估综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009 Jan;6(1):51-68. doi: 10.3390/ijerph6010051. Epub 2008 Dec 28.